/sci/ - Science & Math

Aquinas was right, science and religion can live in peace, we just need to fight the fanatics.

>>3236168
Like good Christian creationism.

Unless your're a mudslime Jewcockmongling NlGGER.

>>3236138
Yeah, those stupid fucking NlGGERS.

>>3236124
>prays to Buddha

>gets overlooked for promotion because he hates on Christians, and everyone around him is a Christian

>thinks he will be socially accepted


nope.jpg

>>3236101
Not like scientifically provable heaven and afterlife.

X+1=God exists!

>>3236090

I completely agree. Fuck spiritually. It's for mudpeople, not scientists like us.

What is going on in here?

Relative from the ground the eagle is moving at 57 mph. Since he's moving in the same direction, you add the vectors.

Relative to the ground for part 2, the eagle is moving at 13 mph, he's flying in the opposite direction, so you subtract

>>2390685
>You're only on the computer right now thanks to the soviets.
Nazi rocketry got us to the Moon. Your argument is invalid.

>Private ownership slows down progress
Personal liberties are the issue. Government having absolute control over the populace is always a bad idea. I'll assume you are aware of this and forgo arguing it.

>All production and material should be oriented toward constructive purposes that build up society and the human species.
You use the Soviets as an example for what is good about Communism, but you know as well as I do the Soviet leadership were not the pinnacles of selfless anthropocentrism you make them out to be. The regimes are good at surviving are the regimes that are most likely to persist. The Soviets cared about the Soviet party, not humanity.

It seems we agree on one thing, that the survival of humanity should be put above all other goals. The problem with communism is that it relies on humans with power in the government to actually give a fuck. The best thing about democratic capitalism is that it doesn't rely on such high hopes to make progress. It benefits from good in humanity but progresses none the less using the negative qualities like greed and general selfishness.

Providing everyone with coca-cola and flat screen TV's plus giving them a ballot and telling them they have a voice also creates a stable society, and stability is as important as productivity.

>>2390685
>You're only on the computer right now thanks to the soviets.
Nazi rocketry got us to the Moon. Your argument is invalid.

>Private ownership slows down progress
Personal liberties are the issue. Government having absolute control over the populace is always a bad idea. I'll assume you are aware of this and forgo arguing it.

>All production and material should be oriented toward constructive purposes that build up society and the human species.
1) You use the Soviets as an example for what is good about Communism, but you know as well as I do the Soviet leadership were not the pinnacles of selfless anthropocentrism you make them out to be. The regimes are good at surviving are the regimes that are most likely to persist. The Soviets cared about the Soviet party, not humanity.

It seems we agree on one thing, that the survival of humanity should be put above all other goals. The problem with communism is that it relies on humans with power in the government to actually give a fuck. The best thing about democratic capitalism is that it doesn't rely on such high hopes to make progress. It benefits from good in humanity but progresses none the less using the negative qualities like greed and general selfishness.

Providing everyone with coca-cola and flat screen TV's plus giving them a ballot and telling them they have a voice also creates a stable society, and stability is as important as productivity.

>>2390614
1) Ideologies are by definition unscientific.
2) Communism is a utopian pipe dream that only hurt humanity's prospects of long term survival, at least Marx take on communism.

>>2390550
Being an anti-abortion "cuz god said so" Christian might be bad, but it's common. Now you are telling me you are against liberalism in general? Take your communism somewhere else.

In Soviet Russia, fetus aborts YOU!

>>2389504
Sounds like someone is a Christian.

The inevitable fusion of religion and science is the exact point in which the singularity will occur. Science spawn from religion many thousands of years ago, and it will return to its birth place in the future and thus, the second coming of christ. Religion and science need not co-exist because religion and science are one in the same.

THOU MAD

I disagree.
There is no 'reason' on terms of the word. Reason isn't possible to explain with words. Reason is a external trait, and Meaning is an internal trait. >Cause and Effect.

The Spiritual Layer:

1. Encryption
2. Compression
3. Development

The Mental Realm:

1. Encryption
2. Architecture
3. Creation

The Physical Realm

1. Compression
2. Composition
3. Creation

1. The Spiritual Layer [is not] the Mental Realm.
2. The Spiritual Layer [is not] the Physical Realm.
3. The Mental Realm [is not] the Physical Realm.
4. The Spiritual Layer is God.
5. God is the Mental Realm.
6. God is the Physical Realm.

1. SL + MR: Encryption
2. SL + PR: Compression
3. MR + PR: Creation
4. Developing is God
5. MR is Developing
6. PR is Developing

Take everything you've heard and learned about from /sci/ and the Science Channel, and shove it out of your mind.
Now.
Go read a basic physics text book, and work your way up from there. Then ask them if you still feel they haven't been answered or you can't disregard them. Bosons and gravitrons are not basic theories, and you need to remember that when you're reading a basic text.

>>2388888

If the Universe wasn't created, then how was the Universe created?