/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12106883
Karl pilkington XDdddddddd

>>8923003
Plastic surgery for non-accident victims should be banned and nudity should be mandatory in the summer.

>>7700683
I. Fucking. Love. Science.

>>7689801
I fucking love science.

I'm torn between choosing Aderall and Ritalin to enhance my performance and deal with my bipolarity.

Which one is better?

>>6444592
Fuck you.

>>6444573
I'm going into CS/software engineering OP.

>>6443476
>Is it fewer green space? Cellphones? Older parents? Alabama's fat as fuck, so I don't think it's all obesity.

Why do none of you dipshits realize that it's all about diagnostic criteria? And why do you pick on autism.

Even though psychology is a psuedoscience we can agree it has produced 2 useful and reliable tools, IQ and MBTI.

Quantum mechanics is inconsistent with classical mechanics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrodinger%27s_cat

>>5950249

Oh.

>>5950245

>can you prove this?

Yes, why?

Why would anyone suspect that all problems whose solutions are easy to check are easy to solve? The alternative doesn't bear thinking about, it's just plain ridiculous. I wish mathematicians would save their breath for real problems.

>>5828104
Wow that's wonderful anon. I'm guessing you're saying this because this is how you believe believers of any faith should behave, and atheists do not do this?

Well then this might surprise you, but the atheists you meet who attack religious people, calling them idiots and such, are not representative of all atheists.

Atheism does not have the goal of attacking theism. It is simply a philosophy. People who call themselves atheists and attack religion are confused, because they too have faith in an idea. Science does not support atheism, it just sometimes proves specific theist ideas wrong, and the silly atheists think that this means science is congruent to atheism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uk76csk7Qo

Look at this Atheist scientist squirm in his seat when asked logical questions on morality and reasoning. Are all atheists this dumb? They don't even know Philosophy 101 lol

Atheist vs. Christian Thread

Okay you win.

0/10

>>5424014
Wrong board. And really, there are a lot better writers and speakers out there than Dawkins. Hitchens, Myers, and Dennett spring to mind.

Of course, you're just trolling. Please go to /b/ for that.

>>5424021
Lols.

>>5203360
>Singapore is tiny, its the only independent city state on Earth.
*cough* Vatican

>>5203319
Distant starlight man. It's even better. If they try to invoke some bullshit about how it's an unwarranted assumption that the speed of light is unchanging, throw at them how we've measured the speed of light as it was in the past from SN 1987A.

>>5203300
See elsethread where the anon did the math to show that ice is not sufficiently sturdy. Also see else-thread for the bazillion other reasons why this wouldn'twork.

>>5203304
Sadly, even idiots can post online. With over a quarter of the American public believing that the rapture is coming in the next 100 years, I think you dismiss their insanity as impossible too quickly.

>>5203291
Really, the problem is some of us want to have a science discussion. We care about what is true.

The other people in this thread do not (or are trolls). They do not believe in science. They believe in the bible first, and will dismiss any evidence that disagrees with the bible. There are words for this: close minded, dogmatic, deluded, insane.

Here, go ahead, prove me wrong theists. Describe to me hypothetical evidence that would convince you that the bible is a work of fiction by humans. Until that point, you are close minded and dogmatic, and I see no purpose in discussing anything with you.

>>5202815
I'm having a discussion about whether there was an ice shell around the Earth. I am attempting to show by example the absurdity of using the bible as a scientific source when investigating this claim. Do you agree?