/sci/ - Science & Math

how to think of values, colors, of objects like maybe when it is translucent, also multiples of them, reflecting and refracting each others.

like maybe use picrel to explain, especially, again, Especially, with the two translucent object supposed like bouncing and refracting light through each others.

assume backgrounds randomly if you are to determine it as correctly to explain, thank you

very weird thread. how are you judging both their intelligence and their 'sentience' by an arbitrary measure of their external reaction? what if I don't give a fuck and prefer to stay inside my mind while having a blank face on, what would you think of that?

they are just possessed, Anon. many people are possessed as well, why do you think they can't shut up?

this is the best representation of 'Universe'

KEK

>>15366482
life is mostly determined, astrology just happens to describe it in a very interesting way

seroquel

because of astrology

>>15366756
>>15366874

>what are animals
>what is feral children
>what is being under hallucinogens or heavy tranquilizers and not experience language at all
>what are people with speech and writing function severed due to cerebral damage
>what are atypical people with no inner monolog

>what is Qualia
>what is experience
>what is being
>what is perception

Language isn't related to [our] experience in any way, and the reason it's so important in your view is because we are social animals, yet there's nothing more to it - making of you an underdeveloped monkey. we can also draw objects to describe what we see, and it doesn't tell anything about experience either, it doesn't become an inherent function related to or our experience itself - it's another description

due to your agonizing mental patterns however you are damned to be an NPC trapped inside several endlessly reinterpretations and forever parrot cheap quotes and cringe gotchas with poor to zero substance to it

>>15366177
I see you are a coper. it's unfortunate. signs have compatibility. certain signs are drawn to certain signs while tolerating to outright hating other signs. for some curious reason Pisces is one of the most unlucky in this regard, so I am here forever instead of having a 'normie' life

that's very cool, I never seen this creature before. no idea how such thing would evolve and why it would be that way, if anyone can explain, it seems for the long time that OP has been gathering dust in the catalog that no one tried to explain yet

I think the mating process of pairs IS based on Astrology, and the cultural and historical context of each times. of course there's the aesthetics, but aesthetics are not down to the biological, otherwise only humans would have the 'pass' to be beautiful. if you are down the 'blackpill' rabbit hole, then you will waste your time, at least when you come down to reality and realize it never made any sense to begin with

why are posts being deleted

likely an Angel or entity being made visible to the naked eye

brutal
engineers and physicists are ultra besed

experience. I'm not engaged, but it seems too creepy. if the Universe was merely dead matter then, I mean we wouldn't be here, but there's this experience, and it's individual, an individual awareness, I think there's no explanation to it

youtube.com/watch?v=4PUIxEWmsvI

science in a nutshell

whoever made this is trying ot unify many systems

>>15365650
>Now the standards are even worse, designed by jews, built by chinks, performed by niggers.

KEK

it's because they continuously broaden the definition of autism each generation in order to retain useless made out of thin air jobs that sole purpose is to profit pharmaceutical companies

definitions, terms et cetera, similarly to borders exist for a reason - autism no longer means anything specific, and for accuracy what remains is its etymology

science isn't real, it's purely descriptive. meaning that, in this sense it isn't telling us anything of worthy. if the territory of smth specific is to be laid out, in purely reductionist terms, what you've is the information of this place that was drawn - the explanation therefore isn't useful, for what difference could've this done to taking a mere look? of course there's utility in the extension, as in the storing slices in methodical systems.by the replication that this allows for, but if replication was so useful, then the Systems of thought would never be torn to pieces from time to time by true Genius. in a rather simplistic view, the modelling of 'Reality' should never be the focus, for that is self-system blindness, rather the manipulation of this 'Reality.' - the useful manipulation of matter however is done by engineering, and this engineering the reshape of already existing elements and material, most of which composed of said Magic 'matter.'

>>15365618
brutal, I am an NPC