/sci/ - Science & Math

A place to talk about abandoned sci-fi.

https://discord.gg/f7VVyPK

At sufficiently advanced technological levels, there is no difference.

Types of biosteels that can be organically grown?

>>10450087

OK, now what?

http://www.labster.com

>>10450006

What property of plants is modular?

Genuine interest.

Are there synthetic materials that would work in lieu of or augmenting myelin?

>>10450024

OK, now what?

OK, now what?

If you could custom-tailor a genetically engineered lifeform, what traits would you give it?

Why people even care about proving their intelligence?

Shut the fuck up unless you have something important to say you fucking faggot fuck.

Ok, just needed to get that out there, I know this is post ironic ironic shitposting haha I'm really REALLY cool for knowing your intent huh? Hah! I got you buddy! Got you! FUCK!

>>8149701
Ok then. Let me rephrase that. How do I attain immortality?

>>8144772
Are labs for a grade? Do they affect your GPA?

>>8149660
Surely there was a basis for the longing to create something to induce immortality back then. Well of course besides being immortal. Just like how a lot of myths and legends derive from scientifically explainable things, wouldn't this be the case as well?

>>8149653
Why not? Surely we can achieve that level of technological advancement

How do we effectively achieve immortality? Ancient alchemists always tried to create the elixir of immortality but they failed to do so.

>implying things that once existed must always exist

We got this guy who doesn't believe in evidence

Because he was a perfect assholes

>Although we now know that Newton discovered calculus years before Leibniz, he published his work much later. A major row ensued over who had been first, with scientists vigorously defending both contenders. It is remarkable, however, that most of the articles appearing in defense of Newton were originally written by his own hand-and only published in the name of friends! As the row grew, Leibniz made the mistake of appealing to the Royal Society to resolve the dispute. Newton, as president, appointed an "impartial" committee to investigate, coincidentally consisting entirely of Newton's friends! But that was not all: Newton then wrote the committee's report himself and had the Royal Society publish it, officially accusing Leibniz of plagiarism.

>Still unsatisfied, he then wrote an anonymous review of the report in the Royal Society's own periodical. Following the death of Leibniz, Newton is reported to have declared that he had taken great satisfaction in "breaking Leibniz's heart."

>>7240458
I agree with the nostalgia part. My dad raised me on the old series, and star trek, even though I can barely handle watching a single episode of either these days. Matt Smith was the worst doctor ever.

>>7240451
That's right man its just that easy. Can't believe no one thought of it before.

I always thought of philosophy as the process of coming up with a hypothesis, whereas science was the process of putting it to the test.

We were waiting for you OP