/sci/ - Science & Math

oh good, I can stay.

Us.
Squid come in second.

It's been scientifically proven.

>>2121370
You have said before that our logic only goes so far.
That was exactly what you said, but I replaced your god with something that does not require faith, but rather reasoning to understand, and a new form of logic to fully comprehend.

Hm... I have an idea.

As nothing in nature happens only once, we could assume that there were multiple big bangs, could we not? After all, they have a finite radius and the universe is infinite.
So, now that we have all our different big bangs floating around, we could assume that the physics and logic of ours don't apply to theirs.
So, we could, in an illogical big bang bubble, have a big bang happen, and couldn't that be our own?
Then, since the reverse cause-effect chain ends at "well, our logic stops working here".

There was no deity in that! >:D

>>2121341
I was having fun in a weird way.

>>2121337
Thank god I did. (Pun intended)

>>2121321
How the hell do you create an infinity of nothingness?

>>2121301
I actually never told you what I believed.
>>2121022

>>2121284
>implying that we aren't in several aspects.
IE, you were created inside a human which was made by humans whom were made by humans; You were probably born in a hospital, which was made by humans.

>>2121282
>since we cannot understand the mechanisms of our existence, we require some sort of faith-system to maintain a logical flow.
We don't "require" jack.

>>2121268
"The universe", like time and space, is an Idea.
Ideas are created by us.

We can't have an rational argument if you insist that the logic is flawed because it's logical.

>>2121191
I was just trying to open this guys mind up and show him that something does not have to come from a god.
But now that I think about it, that was a terrible example.

>>2121160
>if you accept that they were there forever, then you accept that those somethings came to be from nothing.
No. If it was always there then they never had to be created, as they were already there at this proposed time of creation.

>>2121139
Also, if you accept that they could have been there forever, you also accept that a god does not have to be.

>>2121127
But you said they couldn't have. ;)
I never said that I think that I just said what if.

>>2121101
>the "ingredients" cannot have existed to begin with.
Says you.
Prove that they couldn't.
What if all those uniform "ingredients" were there forever huh?

Time is a measurement.
Space is a measurement.
(Time space is a grid.)
Measurements are simply ideas.
Ideas are the things we have.
We created time.

Lol, theists being intolerant.
Just goes to show that our stereotypes about them are wrong, so that means that their stereotypes (>>2121046) are probably wrong.

So that means by making a stereotype like that you're being dumb and not seeing the big picture of that very simple issue, would it not?

>>2121011
[citation needed]

>>2120996
>saying "it just is" isnt fact, you asshat. it's faith. you just havent put a name to it yet.
"I don't know yet, haven't got that far, but I'm going to go ahead and look into it and do some research instead of accepting your groundless accusations."=/= "it just is"

square root of negative one.

>>2120980
as much as the air you breath or the toxic mushroom gas you fear.

Will it kill you? Well, yes, but from heat.