/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9727659
Thank fucking god for good people like you. I AM talking out my ass. But that doesn't mean it has ABSOLUTELY no value. I wanted criticism to really fill in the gaps of reasoning I presented. Because there is a lot of technical work necessary to fully realize my conception. But I wanted feedback on how that would be brought about or how to prove the concept. But noooooo.
Bascially my theory is our 3 dimension arose from previous dimensions and those previous dimensions provide the framework of our universe beneath the atomic level.

>>9724780
Now this thread can officially suck my dick.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2011-04-primordial-weirdness-early-universe-dimension.amp

This is someone whose thinking along the same lines as me.

>>9723258
Then keep on discussing others findings because clearly as evidenced by the level of engagement I've received, you're all incapable of producing your own innovative thoughts. I'll come back to disprove your beliefs. Just thought you'd be able to contribute.

>>9723272
Your understanding is.

>>9723246
Oh my god. I had no idea I needed to produce thesis level work to be engaged with on here. Fine. This is shabby work I'll give that. I put tiny effort into it. But I thought an appropriate place to discuss, elaborate, and expound on the ideas I presented would be here.
I'll come back then with a more sufficient paper.

>>9723244
I'm not going to concede that everything isn't reducible to zero unless you give an example.
And by "reducible" I mean traced back to it's origin.

>>9723235
Oh right. Just stop pursuing idealistic goals? I'm not old enough to have failed as many times as you have in life in my pursuits. But I have learned the most efficient manner of obtaining wisdom is directly from those who have experienced it. And can more precisely communicate it in the context of my situation.
But c'est la vie I guess.

>>9723232
Glad to see your closed minded to the idea of empowering the weak. Maybe that's why relationships are so difficult for you? You lack empathy, compassion, and humility to try and engage with those you perceive as less than you.

>>9723222
Can I get a reading list? I love to learn from others success then to waste effort failing.
Keep in mind it's my first post. Didn't know I couldn't post my own theories. I wanted you to see the gaps in my understanding and help me fill them.

>>9723219
What are the best resources on this?

>>9723222
There's no hurt. The first responses weren't valuable AT ALL. So I critisized them for that. Point me in a direction and I'll follow it down a ways.
Critisize my character for positing I can understand everything and I won't care.
Make unsubstantiated claims that I don't understand something and I'll want what I don't understand clarified and specified.

>>9723219
Thank you. Could you ellaborate your understanding for me?

>>9723215
I would say the same of you...

>>9723212
Dude... I didn't know I had to have things perfect posting on this site. I thought it would be a communal collorabortive project. Not a let's hurl shit at this without stopping for a second to help empathize and understand what he is trying to get at.

>>9723209
I'm not selling you guys on this shit. I'm trying to get you to engage with me on it. I have no pride in this article yet. I have a long ways to go. But I was hoping for some helpful additions and clarifications of my concepts.
Even pointing me at the right article or people who think alike.
The atomism critique was good. I liked it.
I am trying to combine ancient concepts of reality with modern ones because I think linguistics has rendered modern thinkers helpless approaching old forms of science but I find them invaluable.

>>9723205
Bachelors in Philosophy and Psychology. Would love to go back for Masters and Doctorate in Science, Phil, and Psych.

I'm not trying to say this is groundbreaking. I have quite the opposite attitude. This is barely a first draft. Just wanted to jump head first into the chan community.

>>9723200
Glad to hear you have a deep appreciation for ancient conceptions of reality. How naive to dismiss them so flippantly.
I've studied loads of Daoism, Gnosticism, and Alchemy. Hence the untechnical language and as has been repeatedly pointed out "handwaving".
This is my attempt to engage the more technically versed part of science and get oriented with it.

>>9723198
I have narcissistic tendencies but I'd rather use it productively then suppress it.

>>9723189
Understand something philosophically and you should be able to translate it physically.

>>9723184
I'm not interested in halting my progress. I find trial by fire the best method for me to conceive things and be motivated. Give real criticism and stop telling anyone to stop what they are doing.
If you disagree with the path they are walking, show them a better one and do your damn best to get them on it.
I won't be appealed by emotion. I want constructive criticism.

>>9723182
You're right. I can produce it to 0.

>>9723179
>>>9723175 (You)
>Then it's inherently a mathematicak concept which is a model of physicis. Belive me, your haven't proived jacj shit rationally.

Fine. I'll fit the 13 fundamental constants of our universe into my concept and show how they connect in a dimensionally regressive manner.
Would that suffice?

>>9723116
>>>9723059 (You)
>And again matter of 0 dimension would mean matter that has the origin of the universe by your definition, what the hell does that even mean? Don't mix mathematical concepts and expect to not get the aame scrutiny we have in math.

I'm saying what gave rise to 3 dimensionally properties and nature came from and are supported by 0 dimensional elements and nature. Fractaling in complexity.