/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1510028

don't get me started on that school, they are such shit teachers. More than half of them cant speak english. Actually cant speak english or teach.

They get you to drop and take your money, fucking thieves.

you are taking more than 6 subjects? so like single semester courses?

hardest Calc, hardest Algebra, hardest Physics

a perfect combination, they complete each other, they are interrelated.

Economics, is a waste of time.

Com Sci, is basic common sense.

From my experience, i would take Calculus, Algebra and Statistics along with Com Sci and Astronomy and leave actual science for a next year, you'll understand science better when you already know Calculus and Algebra as opposed to studying them while taking physics or other sciences.

Regardless, your coarse load is doable as long you're psychologically and socially adjusted and do actually want to learn.

aint that a bag of shite ;D

also, kill whitey

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTFLBNb6lQk

>>1504592

psychology is influenced by environmental factors...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdJgVf4l1A0

btw, darky hate you.

>>1504072

Socioeconomic factors are indeed holding scientific progress back. But with out monopolizing and compartmentalization knowledge the elite loses power.

Either way, it seems like were moving to a natural bottleneck where people with a certain psychological and cognitive qualities will survive, while the rest will self liquidate.

>>1503707

>subjective readiness to believe
>readiness to believe
>believe

"empiricists, had they existed at the time, would have been the first to disbelieve the findings of Copernicus."

Carl R. Rogers

>>1503707

>subjective readiness to believe

Science: are tentative eliefs, existing subjectively, in a number of different persons.

If they are not tentative than what exists is dogma, not science.

also

peer review = intersubjectivity

>>1503604

i though science was about how it works, not that it works.

how does /sci/ feel about the following statement.

>Among those who have adopted the ground rules of science, tentative belief in the findings of a scientific research can only occur where there is a subjective readiness to believe.

Carl R. Rogers.

>>1501050
>>1501020

cheers mate

>>1501030

more like, i want to know, as opposed to being a pathetic troll trying to make themselves look learned.

>>1500991

its not free though.

what's your source for peer reviewed articles?

>>1500851

can you link me to something i can use to search peer reviewed articles?

>>1500786

what resources can i use to look up Peer Reviewed articles?

does pubmed has them?

>>1500751

so the truth comes down to the publisher then.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18038039

here's a question, how do i find out if an article is peer reviewed?

>>1500705

corporations are made of people.

>>1500699

if you're the environmental protection agency, i would definitely take a look at it, if it aroused my interests.

>>1500642

i'm not trying to convince people. Which is why i'm not arguing.

you guys are arguing and being mad.

i just want to know. I'm asking questions and looking for the truth. Not being dismissive of any information. and forming MY OWN opinion.

>"In summary, we hold that fluoridation is an unreasonable risk."

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HEADQUARTERS' UNION, 2001.