/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16130868

>>16131476
>And a couple hundred perforated toddlers every year is just the price we have have to pay
Yes. Yes it is.
I don't even want to understand what schizo point you are getting at, but if you are saying we need to enact something deep-reaching merely because of a few 100 deaths/year, then I disagree.
The reasons are manifold, but the crux is that people like you (soft-handed, soft-hearted, soft-headed bleeding hearts) don't understand that these 100 deaths are the entire magnitude of the problem in its untreated state and most likely just a statistical aberration to begin with, whereas with your intervention you create a behemoth institution (I am not referring to a literal political-entity institution here) that depresses the human spirit and human potential for an indeterminate duration into the future.

>>16132077
>Is it mathematical? Does it have a symbolic description of the pattern?
What have you tried?

>>16127117
this is word salad,

>>16132117
stupid frogposter

>>16117641
Its nice of them to finally admit it

>>16132105
stupid fairyposter

>>16128584
that telescope dome was antisemitic

>>16126163
>what should intelligent people do?
they should be intelligent to figure that out for themselves

>>16132112
Jokes are supposed to be funny

>>16130536
you sir are a retard

>>16132108
it was a joke you autist

>>16132046
yeah, I'm trying to describe a scenario where there was selective pressure, then a lack of selective pressure, then a return of the selective pressure which results in a return to the original state

>>16132053
>low chances are always proof of God
Why? Because you said so?

>>16126312
pure cope

>>16126312
Does Derrida have one ounce of self-awareness he is precisely the same meaningless post-modern text generator as the AI he maligns are?
>You didn't understand it
I studied philosophy and understood it just fine.
Once you have read a shitton of philosophy, text walls of tightly, intelligently written prose start to lose their luster hard.
On the contrary, being impressed to the point of considering something "unassailable" seems like a very undergrad disposition.
>But unlike AI, his text contains soul
Soul is what we make of it. I agree AI drivel is pointless, but I would also say 95% of texts by reputable philosophers are. 99% of all texts humans have produced are. What matters is what we make of it it and what meaning we imbue them, be it AI-made or manmade.

>>16132045
stupid frogposter

>>16132097
>4 sigma
3 sigma is sort of plausible 4 sigma probably isn't
although africa keeps expanding so maybe soon

>>16132090
I don't know what that is, but this is an older trick

>>16132089
I'm looking for love right now, are you available?

>>16132095
To what end is Orion at all? The whole endeavor is pointless if it's not cool and inspiring.

>>16123199

>>16132096
>it has no downside at all.
that's just retarded.