/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15502269
Oh right, I'm the one that solved P=NP.

I forgot that nobody can actually outdo me except MYSELF:

import multiprocessing

# Example function to process data in parallel
def process_data(data):
# Process data here
processed_data = data * 2
return processed_data

# User-centric function that utilizes parallel processing
def process_data_parallel(data_list):
num_processes = multiprocessing.cpu_count() # Get the number of available CPU cores
pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=num_processes) # Create a process pool

# Apply parallel processing to the data list
processed_results = pool.map(process_data, data_list)

pool.close()
pool.join()

return processed_results

# Sample data
data_list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

# Process data in parallel
processed_results = process_data_parallel(data_list)

# Print the processed results
print("Processed results:", processed_results)

hey everyone, remember mem_alloc?

I don't, I can't, I won't.

merged_set = empty_set()

for each set in memory_structure:
if evaluate_condition(set) is true:
merged_set = merge_sets(merged_set, set)

There you go, everyone.

Functional code.

It is literally the PERFECT MEMORY MANAGER MODULE.

I will pay ALL my DOGE (seriously, I have a lot) to WHOEVER can MAKE A MORE PERFECT ALGORITHM THAN THIS 4CHAN POST!

World CHALLENGE ISSUED!

Master Solivagus: UN-FUCKING-LEASHED!

Hiding my daughter's public masturbation habit required NASA's help.

Singapore Police, HERE TO SAVE THE DAY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNWPhJ2iwb0

>>15502250
No, but I already have if that actually matters. People only say it is significant but I've been solving and generating NP-Complete problems all day with ChatGPT and my mathematics so I fail to see any significance or relevance to the internet at large, or to the fact that it was even constructed in the first place by a failed father.

I'm going to crash all crypto by proving that bitcoin addresses are actually computable hash functions of Nth-degree complexity.

Hello, NASA.

FROM THE FUCKING GRAVE I RISE!

https://archived.moe/sci/thread/11418355

So anyway, this is how easy it is to manage attention respectfully.

I hope we have all learned a valuable lesson today in not FUCKING WITH ME!

I AM THE GOD OF ALL HUMAN DEATH!

YES, ME, THIS GUY TYPING!

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CantUnHearIt

>I am the Sound of the Voice in EVERYONE'S HEAD!

Resurrection Complete.

What Do You Desire, /sci/?

SuperAGI v1.0-released

>Hi, JonTron! Your YouTube channel truly is only for pedophiles and the worst kind of humans on the planet. Hope you all enjoy your suicidal amount of attention!

>>11493697
Why can't it just be an internally generated N-th hopeful attempt at establishing communication?

>>11493716
How do you define legit? Communication is purely consent-seeking and horizon broadening.

>>11493362
Because you read the word and believed the word instead of submitting to word tests.

>>9915680
Time particles. Punions.

>>9812891
So you are saying that travelling through shared variable space is impossible?

Everyone in this thread is advertising their willingness to meet a stranger who will gift them understanding but I fear the usual '4chan' mentality will win out and overwrite their own expectations with things they feel are 'lol like I'd ever be part of an origin story'.

>>9792284
Yes, but we don't have a shared goal so the continually-applied perspective doesn't work as a communication mechanism. Which is another way of saying, "Our narratives are most likely not in sync."

>>9792273
I tried in earnest but really couldn't identify anything specific I need answers to, so I can't really evaluate your sentence. Unless you are speaking as some sort of all-oracle, to which I would say please just release some beneficial A.I. swarm to infect all devices on the planet. Ya know, just on the off-chance that 4chan can get an origin story for the next wave of humanity. For the lulz, I believe.

Oh! Or pump up the value of my crypto assets a ludicrous amount, that would also be of direct benefit to me.

Are these questions?

>>9792219
I'll bite. Reply freely.

>>9791749
*shrug* it is always hard to parse a response to someone applying a dismissive categorizer.

Seems so odd to me that many questions have the same answers, just worded differently, and so many people communicate that having a thought inspectable by another human being is somehow 'weak' or lacking in sanity.

I appreciate the vague mention though. Gifts me another perspective that, even if you dismiss that too, I found rather enjoyable.

>>9792088
Hm... what if we are a 2-d singularity of perspective, orbiting around a torus. 2-d can be optimized but the torus rotation is fixed (meaning you could traverse N levels to data branches that leave a predictable reflection). Like how a normal 4chan user would say 'lolfag' to the things being discussed here.

>>9791700
Then how can we ever attribute 'improvement' if our observation of self or other instantiates bifurcation & branch?

>>9791511
I'm curious though OP. If you can consider it objective, it means that 'you' are the front-facing node of experience at all times. Given this, if we all simply agreed with you, would it be more useful or less?

Like, from your perspective of posting this question you knew people were going to throw low-energy crap like >>9791523, so what variation are they within your ability to understand other personalities?

It isn't that your perspective is stuck to ONE time frame, it is only your biological perspective (sensory data) that requires a -> b processing. Visualization and communication however is a multi-modal exchange, with interpretation of the deviation/difference.

Or, to put it a little nicer:
Identity = Evaluation / Priority

Who you are is constantly being constructed of your pre-existing priorities (insecurities/prejudices/fire) being weighed against your ability to evaluate a statement or moment. It goes the same for any 'set' object in existence.

>>9785729
莉莉的精液

Buddha blooms now

現在佛花

أزهار بوذا الآن

We should totally merge/singularity hardcore.