/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4995544
Now how would you know i was banned? mmm.

Because im not autistic.

>>4993964
Literally the stupidest thing i have ever read.

>>4993906
>thats unrelated to free will AND quantum mechanics.

Sure, in the same way chemistry is unrelated to evolutionary biology. HURRRRRRR

And im going to bed.

>>4993870
This board disappoints me. Point in case, this poster. Is there anyone here whom actually studies or practices science?

>Physics has been about causality since the early beginnings of the field.
Dear fuck that was terribly put, but for the sake of congruence i'll pretend it made sense. Quantum mechanics correlates with philosophy in the context of 'free will' because it contains within the parameters for which duality is a boundary condition. I'll simplify, it lends credibility to the two opposing ideologies.

Cements them in logic and observable reality. Being that ... hmm ... hmmm? I guess i'll have to tell you, being that the concept before, aforementioned branch of physics matured, required a 'leap of faith' as it were in determining which stance you took, being, is the universe random or is it linear?

Chaos theory, you fucking spastic.

>>4993862
>The ramblings on free will are total garbage. But I couldn't give less of a fuck.
If you'll take notice, i didn't actually provide my opinion on the topic. Just physics contributions to the theories.

Im aware you may not be as attentive as i had hoped, disappointing. And classes? Many.

>>4993836
>Out of interest, what field would that be?
A few, primarily Psychology, lets just put that down as the most basic. No need to delve into Neurology unless pressed.

>Nonsense. Quantum mechanics doesn't say anything whatsoever about that.
Think about free will. The assertion of causality, where did this principle come from? And now what theory unified that concept with applicable physics? There we are ...

>>4993824
>>4993823
>>4993820
>typical /sci/ posters.

>>4993808
/sarcasm.

Everything relates to causality in my field, believe me, i appreciate the contributions of mathematicians and physicists. Quantum mechanics directly asserts authority into the philosophy and conceptualization of 'free will'.

>>4993791
>The mind is biased in so many ways.
Then stop asserting absolute fact, fucking moron.

Without those autistic mumblings you wouldn't have modern luxuries. Pay respect to those that sacrificed their sex lives for your enjoyment.

>>4993778
I hope you're aware that im aware you're the same anon troll from previous conversations. How i know that is irrelevant.

Cookies are an interesting thing.

>>4993781
Neither is it science if you ignore a hypothesis under the presumption its impossible. You're doing the same thing they're doing.

>>4993770
Well i hope you're not implying that we're still at their level. Speculation is one thing, but genuine possibility is another. Technology is advancing at a rate much faster than ever could have been anticipated. Our understanding of these types of phenomenon and physical principles is only just starting to blossom.

Is it impossible at this point in time? Yes. Does that mean it will always remain so? Who knows, its foolish to claim with certainty either possibility.

>>4993748
>science.

You keep using that word, i dont think you know what it means.

>>4993753
My point. Simply apply that sensation, or rather lack there of, to ... everything. And you have what its like to live without language.

>>4993743
Cry cry cry.

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>>4993733
About that. Let me ask you, does it disappoint you? Your lack of understanding, empathy, compassion, intellect.

It would me. Hell, im disappointed in you.

>>4993726
>try and describe smell in the same way you would describe taste or a smell.

Can't brain while sleepy.

Try and describe a smell the same way you would taste or a sound.

>>4993714
Rather old.

Good question. We aren't entirely sure, but we can combined aspects of research into the mentality of the blind and deaf from birth.

Language is ultimately a behavioral adaptation in which cuts down on sexual grooming time, theorized at almost 50%, however, communication developed as a side effect and from this we gather our understanding of each other beyond visual cues.

Truth is, we don't think with language, we simply use language to describe what we think. A simple thought experiment, try and describe a smell in the same way you would describe taste or a smell. its much harder than the other senses, ironically our sense of smell has been the most recently adapted part of our physiology. Why? Who knows, but its gotten weaker as a result of some evolutionary and environmental change. Most likely simply due to a lack of a need, the supply doesn't meet demand in this instance. A diluted for arises, getting sidetracked, without language, you simply can't describe in language what you're thinking or sensing.

>>4993682
Contagiousness is an irreverent thing to define the parameters of within the context of my response. Its already factored into the hypothetical situation and the question, stating the stated is idiotic, and a waste of time.

Big boy science teaches you this. Context, its important to understand.

You dont understand it, and thats why you've never, and will most likely never, make any valuable contributions to your chosen field of intellectual application. At this point in time the best you could hope to 'come back' with is, " haha, jokes on you! Im not even studying! Im just a loser! " Which is deeply pathetic.

You have my pity.

>>4993665
Contagiousness is irreverent at this scale of infection. And if you knew anything about bacterial infections, you'd know how potentially contagious they can be.

If golden staph in some manner cross bred with a much more potent disease, then over the course of 10 or so years it could become something of a bubonic plague situation except ending in the collapse of modern civilization.

Fun.

>>4993627
>You sound religious.

My word, 1/10. Subtlety isn't your strong suite.