/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4902666

Why must you use redneck as a derogatory term. It is a distinct racial adjective. You havejust admitted that you call whites of all backgrounds as rednecks despite redneck simply meaning White Southern and Working Class.

It is a horrific word when you look at it. It is a word to describe southern whites as ugly dumb brutes but like all racial slurs, the group that it is used agianst adopts it as something positive.

You ahev just admitted that you use the word to describe whites of multiple backgrounds. The wikipedia pointed out shows it is similar to cracker. It is a racial word, you use it openly and and yet you are politically correct when it comes to racial terms with blacks.

Quite frnakly, you are a racist and if you are white, you are a brainwashed ethnomasochist. Im not america and I am very tired of the white racial labels used in a society that claims to put race behind us.

Clearly people like you are fond of bashing whites of any background.

>>4902628
>>4902628

>Not southern
>not working class
>call her a redneck

And yet you still use the word despite it having no comparison to Palin. The only thing left is white.

>>4902598
>>4902600

But you are directly describing someone who is white. That is the point. You wouldn't call a non white person a redneck. Nor would you call a group ''black trash.'' Don't claim you would becuase you wouldn't. You wouldn't call people Darknecks so why would you use a word which directly involves race. There are plenty of crazy neo conservative southersner who aren't white.

Redneck is a description of white working class southerners. It uses race, its very word is a burn white neck which becmes red. How can you deny its racial overtones and yet be so OK with using it?

Why not use another word? Why must you use a word which involves race? And dont give me this lame excuse that Nigger and Redneck are different due to Historical context. It's still a word with racial overtones and yet you would not use similar social class race descriptions with other races. So you are a hypocrite.

>>4902603

So you could call a black male a Redneck?

>Second, if you're dropping "working class" and "Sotuthern" and leaving only "black," then that means every black person is a Nigger. Literally no one means that when they say nigger. Therefore you are full of shit.

>>4902589

>Second, if you're dropping "working class" and "Sotuthern" and leaving only "black," then that means every white person is a Nigger. Literally no one means that when they say nigger. Therefore you are full of shit.

>>4902584

>You can't change your race dumbass, but you can stop being a fucking nigger- herein lies the difference between mindless racial slurs and social class slurs like nigger. I'm sorry that you identify personally with morons like niggers and go around being ''hu rah nur nur nur'' all the time, or think the ''blAK RACE BE BEIN ATTAKED BU DEM CRACKERS ND DEM DEM POLITIKAL COREKT PEEPLE" -- that's not my fault, you're just stupid.

Why is pointing out hypocrisy so offensive to you? Redneck describes whites, any word which describes black and uses it as a derogatory term would be racist and yet here you are proclaiming it is fine.

It is hypocrisy. Why must I be part of the KKK for pointing out your hypocrisy? I thought any decent minded person would prefer not to use terms which directly involve race? So why do you and then claim the moral high ground?

>>4902583

Sarah Palin is White. The term describe suburn on a White Neck. Wikipedia claims it is a derogatory word that decribes whites.

It is a racial term and if you use it while claiming Nigger is wrong then you are a hypocrite. Read your own source.

>>4902569

>Redneck is a derogatory slang term used in reference to poor, uneducated white farmers, especially from the southern United States.[1][2] It is similar in meaning to cracker (especially regarding Georgia and Florida), hillbilly (especially regarding Appalachia and the Ozarks),[3] and white trash (but without the last term's suggestions of immorality).[4][5][6]

>yfw you cant read your own source

>>4902569

>wikipedia says it isn't a racial slur
>the word is a decription of white working class southern americans
>claims that when this word is used as a negative, it isn't using race as part of its adjective
>implying you aren't a massive hypocrite
>implying you need wikipedia to think for yourself

So Wetback is fine because it simply decribes a wet back, right?

>>4902566
>>4902529

>Bullshit. A Nigger doesn't have to be any of those things. And his parents are black working class southern Americans but they aren't goddamn niggers.

>>4902550
>>4902537

>white trash
>openly declares the use of race
>claims it isn't racial

I love it. Dat cognitive dissonance.

>>4902543

Yes, they were white and their necks burnt from working in the Sun. Redneck has become the term White Trash. I doubt any of you would say Nigger or call Africans Black trash nor would you use a slur which directly uses skin tone as part of its description.

Redneck, used as a negative term is racial. It is the description of Southern Working Class Whites. It is racial. I do love how you cna call me the KKK and yet use racial slurs.

It is a racial slur and has most certianly grown as a negative term over the past two decades.

Oh it's fine to describe an entire population using their skin tone as long as its white, right? Hypocrisy at its finest.

>>4902501

note*

>>4902492

Redneck is a racial slur used specifically against White Working Class Southern Americans. I could say being a Nigger is a state of mind.

Redneck is a racial slur that everyone seems OK with, most especially so calle dprogressives who ignore the fact that it is directed at White Working Class Southerners. Not the term red neck is for a sunburnt neck due to hot Southern Weather.

>>4902481

>redneck
>probably hates the word niggar but is fine with a European based racial slur aimed at sothern americans

Those rednecks will survive longer than the Northern yuppies.

>>4902459

Typical Western progressive ideals.

Making people happy is not when Humanity is built for. It is a nice idea to aspire to but what is happiness and what happens when happiness is used to dull the senses and the mind against the subversive elements of corrupt governments.

We live in a socety where every need is met. Housing, food, water, healthcare and much much more. Yet our system is failing, it is unsustainable and we have very high depression rates aswell as suicide.

Why does our modern western society have such a high amount of depression and suicide while ancient times had (from what we can tell) a much lower rate of depression and suicide. Haiti has one of the lowest suicide rates known to WHO and yet it was one of the most depressing, poor and squalid, corrupt nations known to us.

The sad fact is humanity thives when it is downtrodden. It thrives against adversity due to our instinctive survival nature.

An Art gallery would solve nothing. The only happiness it would bring would be to middle class yuppies who think they are special, besides modern art is a horror in comparison to our ancient art. What these people need is to be armed and given an udnerstanding that they are owned. They must kill their owners.

To be happy is a false ideal. The true ideal is to be fed, to continue your cultural and genetic heritage and to ovecome obstacles that stand in your way.

>>4900910

Im sure Motumbo and his inability to sell his crops due to foreign aid wiping out his farming market makes him really happy.

All those starving children being fed so they cna breed more starving children. Truly, this is the work of a genius and his unending passion of helping people by making them utterly dependent on you.

>>4900837

The use of energy is universal. They will call it something entirely different but an intelligent life which can travel solar systems understands energy and its usage.

>>4900830

You make an excellent point but we have water and lots of it... it depends how vaulable that is.

>>4900851

>modern art

I think OP means the realistic and wonderous art bfore art became a joke.

>>4900813

It is a character and no, I do not use Cocaine.

>>4900825

The usual Doomsday predictions. Apparently London is going to get nuked on the 27th and there is a large amount of tinfoil evidence. Enough to actual have me getting just slightly worried.

It's the Olympics opening

>>4900801

>That's some assumption you got there pal.

Sch disasters don't hit suddenly, they take years and years. Civilization will save its information, are we not saving seeds and DNA of animals and plants in vaults?

>I hope your kind kills itself to extinction in the cataclysm while stabbing each other in their backs, right below the tattoo of Ayn Rand.

Strawman argument. I did not say ALL Altrusim is bad. Merely its overuse. Do you really think Foreign Aid helps SubSaharan Africa? Do you really believe that creating dependency helps people? Do you think people don't abuse your charity or that some who are charitable are not selfish? Do you think that those who are selfish and savage do not use those who ignore their savage nature?

>he thinks Im a Randroid
ho ho ho... very far off.

>Whoa, you keep pulling them big assumptions on board like a champ! What're you using as bait?

Yes, mankind can sure expand with drought and famine.