/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8398143
It would've been legitimate grammar in the title/subject heading.

>>8398117
>>8398128
<- Found a way to circumvent spamming with the URL.

>>8398117
Tell me if this doesn't work:
'General-System-Theory', put tinyurl.com before it.

>>8398082
What edition do you need?

>>8397481
Does anyone here have experience with it?

>>8397495
I mentioned this:
>>8397477
>>8397461
Although you get a (you) for:
>These are massless 'groups' of energy which oscillate at a given frequency.
Good job, anon.

>>8397497
Fair enough, I truly was being pedantic.

>>8397485
True, I was just being a jackass, sorry. Anyway, you get the point I was trying to make.

>>8396980
Upload her consciousness into your own brain, allowing her to live vicariously. :^)

>>8397473
I don't think they should be called particles, I think they should be called what they are: "a quantum of electromagnetic radiation." And if you're going to mention them, you should mention their duality as both wave and particle.

>>8397472
A photon is a quantum of electromagnetic radiation. They also exhibit duality as both a sine wave and particle, most apparent in things like photoelectric effect. They also act as the gauge boson for the electromagnetic force.

>>8397464
In trying to make the point he shouldn't call them particles and if he's going to, he should mention their duality. If you want to 'duelity' with me, step up, son.

>>8397455
I think I know what you're looking for:
When an electron moves a quantum, every quantum lost by an electron releases a photon.

>>8397458
>What is wave-particle duality?
BTFO.

>>8397448
Thank you, this is exactly what I was looking for, anon.

>>8397451
>vague understanding
>particles have wavelength
Sure. :^)

>>8397446
I was talking about in the proposed footnote:
"Electromagnetic waves are patterns of subatomic particles that are released as a result of processes requiring energy. The frequency at which the particles oscillate determines the type of radiation that they are. Everything from visible light, to x-rays to radio waves are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and their prime difference is simply the wavelength that the particles possess."

Noting: "the wavelength that the particles possess."

That being, particles do not possess wavelength, which would mean, should he add that he would also need to explain wave–particle duality.

>>8397435
Basically, if you want to mention wavelength, you need to mention wave–particle duality.

>>8397432
>wavelength that the particles possess.
Particles don't have wavelength, waves, or more accurately sine waves do.

>>8397360
>wavelength that the particles possess
Particles don't have 'wavelength', waves, or more accurately sine waves do.

>>8397429
Mathematics, physics and chemistry, I'm studying nuclear physics.

>>8397421
No, I'm saying I want to improve things like memory, or spatial ability so that I can use these things to be able to memorise information with more efficiency or recognise and solve patterns/problems more efficiently. And considering these fields comprise IQ, it should increase IQ also and therefore seeking to increase IQ would improve those individual fields.

>>8397405
>>8397408
The aspects that go toward calculating IQ, such as memory ability and those that have a positive effect upon ability.

>>8397411
Thank you.

>>8396298
Thank you, this was incredibly insightful.

>>8396301
>>8396307
I'll look into it, thank you.

>>8396319
I want to improve the aspects that are the constituents of IQ, such as spatial ability for pattern recognition.

>>8396342
Does method of loci work for things like this?

>>8396188
I'm doing active subject based study concurrent my training routine.

>>8396176
Wouldn't practising effective cognitive patterns, such as pattern recognition improve that skill by promoting neurogenesis in related neurons?