/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7292006
kek

I can confirm this is true. I swallow my bfs cum and it makes me feel better and focus/use my imagination more when I learn

The triangle is not necessarily equilateral.

>>4680450
So could an afterlife technically exist? We're on a never ending program, and our "god" is a user who just doesnt play?

>>4680436
So then it really isnt the percieved size of said universe that matters, it'd be the amount of shit going on?

>>4680382
non /sci/ fag here, actually a /fit/o/citizen.

Anyway.

Our computers are a set size (i.e 5 feet long), but the information held can be vastly larger. Take for example Fallout 3, the game spans an obscene distance (103 square miles when overlayed with a map from the real world).

Now, granted only parts are rendered at a time, but all the background processes still exist. That's why random shit goes wonky.

103 square miles all contained on one little videocard, transposed onto a moniter.

With a bunch of videocards put together and shit, we could simulate a whole earth.

It's only a matter of time.

test

>>4524424
Does LSD have any flashbacks that actually occur years from now?

>>4524343
Weed gives me a high, not what I want.

Alcohol doesnt make me think, it makes me.. drunk.

something else? DMT is along-the-lines of what I want, but i'm a little nervous of it, so something else would be great.

I'm not stupid.

Seriously. I just want a drug to amplify this feeling. C'mon.

Hey /sci/, I have a drug question.

I'm trying to figure out a drug to take. Now, I'm pretty clean, and I'm staying away from heavily addictive (read: heroin, meth, and cocaine) drugs. But I'm all for anything else.

I'm looking for a drug that causes severe disassociativeness, emptiness, greater thought processing, maybe mild happiness, and possibly hallucinations, but that last one isn't necessary.

Any thoughts guys?
Pic is my unfinished car.

Alright, well, thanks a bunch /sci/. I really appreciate the help, but I'm gonna call it a night. Have a good one, sci people

I agree I think there is alot of miscommunication going on. I know the basics, but the idea isn't working. I can safely say I can move a magnet in any direction around any axis at any time and I am not reading a voltage. If I remove the diode, is there a simple way to see if voltage is flowing, besides a LED? I have none sadly.

>>4369156
I'm listening

>>4369113
Well I'm not going for anything right now except progress haha

But I tried it. the magnet taped to the desk. Didn't get anything (I'm running the current through a diode, to measure it in millivolts DC. Don't think thats a problem though)

But yeah.. do you guys think it may just be the wire? It's 30g enamel-coated magnet wire

Okay so here I have a neodymium magnet duct taped to my desk. A coil sits on top of it, and in back there is a pen with 2 magnets on it, held together by their magnetic pull.

If I were to spin the pen's magnets along a horizontal axis over the coil as it sits on top of the magnet, then it should induce an electrical current right?

>>4368969
Yes that's right, I used to have a second disk which 12 magnets mounted on and spun freely over the disk of coils.

So then /sci/, if I tape one magnet to my desk and levitate the other in the air, when I pass one of these coils through it I should get some sort of voltage, right?

>>4368935
Continuity* My mistake, /sci/

>>4368921
Had some, but they went missing... in the short while I did have them, I tried hooking the LEDs to the thing and they didn't do a thing.

>>4368925
Yeah I know, I'm really not basing the design on anything at the moment. I really just want a proof of concept right now, It's one thing for people to say "Passing a wire through a magnetic field induces an electric current" but it's another thing to actually do it yourself. If you have an idea for keeping the magnets stationary and the coils moving, i'd love to hear it. I just didn't want to deal with the pain of slip-rings.

To be honest, OP is getting a bit discouraged by something so simple not working right

>>4368904
Same way an internet does.

I really don't have a good answer for you OP, but I would recommend google. Or gypsy magic. Or Gypsy Google.

Oh, and about altering the magnetic flux, i've arranged all 12 magnets in an alternating-poles configuration before and spun them along the same axis as the coils, so... over the top of the coils, I guess is the best way to say it.

Well, most recently I've just been doing something like this. Put the magnets on a bolt and spin it around really fast. But in the past I've just moved a single magnet over each individual coil, and close as possible, and still nada

>>4368821
Wut? I don't understand