/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4308255
Suuuure... have aliens slobber unidentified chemicals ALL over your dick. Genius. You should totally do it. Maybe you'll be poisoned by their arsenic-based saliva and die a horrible death.

>>4308237
This

>>4150639
>>4150638
Wut?

Pi is irrational. It. Does. Not. End.

>>4145753
I disagree. An unacted-upon desire is more Gray asexual than "true" asexual.

Hardwired? Ever heard of asexuals?

I'd definitely switch to synthetic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro_meat

>>4135868
REALLY?! We've established that. Read the thread before you post. And, when there are sages before your half-assed post, sage too.

>>4135855
The DNA itself would decompose. It isn't a very stable molecule over such long periods of time.

>>4135841
>Don't know how to do it

The fuck is wrong with you? Ever heard of ITER?!

>>4135807
Fucking. This.

>>4135825
No. The bonds would fall apart, destroying the sequence of base pairs.

So... No, one cannot simply jerk into a bottle.

>>4119137
>9gag.com watermark
>mfw

>>4103566
Then my sources are shit, sorry.

The fact is that LFTR's still produce radioactive waste and have a tiny (but present) chance of a meltdown. The public isn't comfortable with that. Fukushima did not help the nuclear cause at all.

What does need a good grassroots campaign is Fusion energy, where the waste product is Helium and the fuel is renewable.

That being said, I'm still an LFTR supporter and will help out any way I can.

Fuck all of you LTFR people. It's fusion all the way. Deuterium is RENEWABLE and the waste product? Fucking helium.

>>4097896
>typical below average CS types
That cracked me up.

>>4097810
Well his first language might not be English. His argument is flawed, but not because of the language barrier.
>>4097806
Well who knows? We'll never be able to research enough if there's so many nay-sayers around.

Bump

So, /sci/, it looks like we're getting closer to usable quantum computers!
Thoughts? Especially from the tr*nshumanists.
Here is a link to the article:
http://ul(dot)to/xyu3dfht

>>4067272
Empirically? Please, go ahead...

...oh wait; I just proved you wrong.

>>4063752
So his English sucks. Maybe it isn't his first tongue.

>>4063743
You can't think in terms of "purpose" in evolution. That shit just happens.

>>4063030
Here's a good wiki article explaining it all step-by-step. I'll assume you know how to get from the area of the segment to its volume in a cylinder.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_segment

>>4053279
Mindfucked. It sounds a little too far-fetched; but then again, so is most of modern physics.

>>4043686
This. They're called neutrinos for a reason. They simply do not interact with 99.99% of the matter they come across; if they did, we'd all be fried.