[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.4509011 [View]

>>4508983
11,000 shitty useless posts. Go and attention whore on /soc/, they love that shit.

>>4508992
>accuses of people of inanely and pointlessly challenging him to waste his time
While inanely and pointlessly challenging people to waste their time
>accuses people of distracting from the actual topic
While calling a video inaccurate because the title is a joke and not formal and mathematical
>getting upset when I don't bite
Being austistically devoid of emotion

>> No.4508996 [View]

>>4508976
What you seem to be missing is that there's really no logical flaw in solipsism; It's quite literally the most scientifically correct belief there is, beyond believing that gravity exists, or there are three dimensions of space, or that you're a human on earth.
Nonetheless, the human brain is supposed to preserve itself and solipsism doesn't help that cause. Solipsism is caused by an overly powerful logical method of thinking.

>> No.4508981 [View]

>>4508923
Me, in response to you asking for an explanation of infinitesimals because you didn't think they existed:
Prove that 1+1=2 and I will prove to you that infinitesimals are infinitesimal.
You, in response:
>Sounds like a troll to me.

And a complete lack of an explanation.

>> No.4508964 [View]

>>4508946
I don't even know if I'm impressed or scared for the human race
>>4508962
4chan x isn't shitty

>> No.4508912 [View]

>>4508882
ooh, improperly formatted image macros. you've really outdone yourself.
>>4508902
If you recall correctly, you repeated several things several times and then insulted me as a troll because I was keeping up an academic debate. You don't insult your opponent then claim that they are the one that lowered the tone, lol.

>> No.4508887 [View]

>>4508877
All links are clickable links.

>> No.4508870 [View]

>>4508860
What about 1/ 3x or 3/1x?

You're making up rules. Seriously, check for yourself if you want.
>>4508862
Don't point it at /hm/ whatever you do, that's the best board on 4chan at the moment.

>>4508865
Define upset.

>> No.4508859 [View]

>>4508855
Actually, watching you try time after time to become an even more worthless human being is really entertaining. I'll stick around,

>> No.4508841 [View]

>>4508827
is 1/3x 1/(3x) or (1/3)x?
>>4508830
Oh shit what have I done she's back and more mentally ill than ever before
Site wide ban of EKFQOBUFnQ please mods

>> No.4508826 [View]

>>4508815
*both* expressions have brackets, emphasising the two different interpretations.

Linear notation is shitty, please understand this before arguing about whether linear notation is shitty or not. 2/3/4 could mean (2/3)/4 or 2/(3/4)

>> No.4508811 [View]

>>4508782
Take your pills
Wait no, namefag again so I can filter you or something, I don't need your schizoid bipolar vomit all over the threads I'm in.

>>4508783
6/2=6/1 * 1/2 = 6*2^-1

2(1+2)= 2/1 * (1+2)/1
=2/ 1/(1+2)
=2/(1+2)^-1
All multiplications and divisions are interchangeable, bodmas/pedmas/pemdas are all taught to simplify the matter but as multiplication and division are different representations of the same function, they have equal precedence

>> No.4508791 [View]

>>4508769
I'm not a solipsist, I'm pointing out that OP is asking for an explanation of why a mind conjures up solipsism when that's an inherently stupid question. It's like me saying "ignore the fossil record. Now, what evidence is there for evolution". Whatever answer you get is going to be weakened by your initial assumptions.

>> No.4508770 [View]

>>4508764
6/(2(1+2) and (6/2)(1+2) are both valid interpretations, EK.

>> No.4508757 [View]

>>4508730
I'm asking for the non-axiomatic basis (if any) behind assuming solipsism to be a product of a mind.

>> No.4508751 [View]

>>4507607
>ITT: People think that the method they learnt in elementary school is the mathematically correct one

Multiplication/division hold equal precedence because they are the inverse of one another and must do. Addition/subtraction also hold equal precedence because they are the opposite of one another and must do.

6/2=6*2^-1. So by your idea of Multiplication being before division, the answer is now 3(1+2)

The actual answer is that linear notation sucks and that the question is ambiguous and improperly bracketed.

>> No.4505610 [View]

>>4505604
No, he means daption. The root of adaption, fucking hell can nobody here read?

>> No.4505532 [View]

>>4505521
You go, girl. Don't let the mean internet man get you down.

>> No.4505505 [View]

>>4505503
And then you realise that all of those problems are useless and you could have used google maps. And you feel bad for wasting your time instead of studying an actual field like calculus.

>> No.4505496 [View]

>>4505490
97%, and the mark down was for not writing out my workings on one of those fucking primms things

>> No.4505487 [View]

>>4505467
It looks much friendlier than the other stuff posted ITT.

>> No.4505483 [View]

>>4505469
Wait, seriously?

The 7 bridges problem is pretty much the first thing you come across, I knew about it before I knew what eulerian meant

>> No.4505480 [View]

>>4505451
zzz
I had to spend 3 months on it last year. Graph theory fucking sucks.

>> No.4505386 [View]

>>4505167
slow clap

>> No.4505374 [View]

>>4505227
Probably but not by design. I'd imagine that some badly planned server rooms end up looking like this.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]