/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6169907
You fucking morons still don't think this is serious.

I warned you all.

>>6028443

So you just assume that I used a name and tripcode to make my previous postings?

And you feel this is definitive.

>>6028446
Cancer being a thing of the past if the best we can hope for. Truthfully this is the only comfort I can seem to find in the matter.

>>6028442
ok, you have addressed the decay of iodine 131. You should that exposure has already occurred and the damage has been done.

what you have failed to address are the many other elements involved, or how the now continuous release of iodine 131 offsets the rate of decay.

>>6028471
>>6028479
suck a dick, monkeys.

>>6028434
Please go ahead, educate us.

I would dearly love to hear what you have to say in regards to the matter.

And still, nobody is interested in the very real concerns we should all be having at this point.

>>6028422
You do understand how miraculously dense you seem, right?

>>6028419
Yeah sure.

>>6028409
Right.

>>6028381
One thing I would like to know is how any intelligent individual could take this article seriously.

Onsite levels of gamma radiation being used to debunk the severity of the event? No mention whatsoever of Iodine, Caesium, plutonium, or strontium anywhere within the article?

Does anybody here actually understand how this works?

>>6028381
Sadly, Lewis Page is completely ill informed.

None of you idiots would listen. I tried to warn you all.

What do you have to say for yourselves? Anybody paying attention yet?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/japan-fukushima-panel-idUST9N0FT06A20130805

>>4985092
gives me goosebumps.

>>4984507
>what kind of operating system does it use?

>Vista

>Were going to die!


hahahahahhaha

>>4983647
Can you bend and braze copper tube? Setup digital control circuits, and wire AC power circuits?

If so, you might be able to pull this off with an old refrigerator and a fan(s).

>>4984125
wat.

>>4984104
I think it's pretty cool. just finished BSG, what a great series.

>>4984092
I'm glad you are enjoying it. This has been an interest of mine since a child, I find most of the documentaries fail to emphasize the terror of what happened, this i think does a much better job.

>>4984021
that goes for anyone interested. It really shoves all the reasons that the technology itself is not what we should be afraid of, directly into the light.

>>4983754
You should watch this, i think theres 6 parts this is part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNQhyh6VY1A

If you are as interested about what happened that morning as I am, you will probably love how it is set into a movie rather then a full blown documentary. Really sets the mood for what happened on that fateful morning.

>>4981870
...


*sigh*

>>4981856
you are pretty fucking stupid though. maybe just drunk.

>>4981845
well actually you see while his post contains a technical inaccuracy, it is spot on as far as the concept is concerned. using a technical inaccuracy as means to disregard something is entirely typical.

>>4981827

>>4981778
no intelligent person can look at the evidence and come to the idea that they were not brought down intentionally. This does not matter, nobody cares, nobody will side with you. Run.

>>4981716
it's because poeple don't want to be lab rats and the scientific community is too full of itself to understand the importance of acknowledging long term unanticipated effects.