/sci/ - Science & Math

Try use your imagination to interpret the bible, what's the matter, is your mind limited into believing it's a fairy-tale?

That's all for today. I'll be sure to resume my crusade tomorrow.

Peace

Gravity inside the Earth? Or a magnetic field outside of the Earth?

Magnets, how do they work?

In the beginning Gravity created the Time and the Nature. The Nature was without form, and void rather like a black hole; and darkness was upon the face of the deep in the middle. And the Spirit of Love moved across the face of the outside pulling time towards the centre. As time met the middle like a sperm meets the egg, Gravity said, “Let there be Light,” and there was light. Gravity received the light, seen that it was Good, and separated it from the darkness. Gravity called the light Day, and the darkness Night, and there was Evening and Morning, alike a ying yang.

And God saw that the life was Good, and separated the life from the darkness. God called the life Day and the darkness he called Night. And there was an evening and morning.

And God said, "Let there be life" and there was life.

The Knowledge was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the spirit of God was moving across the face of the waters.

First God created the Imagination and Knowledge

>>2001051
Imagination isn't a fairy-tale, it's real. And religion has been fabricated. It is science, just misunderstood through Atheistic-editing and transformation. Most of the insults that Atheists use are actually more relative to Atheists themselves. Maybe you should stop thinking about what you can imagine and start thinking about the why. Oh yeah! You're a humongous nihilistic faggot, you're insignificant and have no meaning -- there is no 'Why'

When I see the planet Earth. I use my imagination to show that it has a top + bottom, left + right, front + back, as dualities and antipodes. I can go to a new planet and know that the side of which I don't see, exists. Science on the other hands, according to the laws that it puts in place when doing science on other things, HAS to check the other side, under the impression that it isn't structured and could be completely random. That's unimaginative, putting trust into knowledge and meaninglessness and avoiding imagination and significance.

/thread

>>2001018
And there you have it. Proof. Science and imagination cannot co-exist, according to science.

>>2000910
Doing science isn't imagination you sketchy unintelligent gullible prick. Academia is against imagination, and modern-day science revolves around that. Imagination allows you to think 'outside of the rules', and your 'rules' show that you aren't thinking outside. And conducting science is not imagination, it's alike a trained dog. I know of 'this', and I know of 'that', and I know how to 'mix' - I'll combine my knowledge.

>>2000899
You're not worth arguing with as you just admitted you're dumb as fuck and are desperately trying to 'win' something. Shame really, I was hoping for a competitive reply.

>>2000828
I imagine before the word virus the imagination was much better. Now it's limited to what we know, as you said -- but the fact I CAN use my imagination to interpret events based on what I know, that doesn't require tons of evidence, and gives us meaning other than insignificance, supports and gives reasoning to changing the scientific nihilistic approach. Imagination is the OPPOSITE of knowledge.

>>2000813
Science is not imagination. Science is knowledge. Science requires vast amounts of evidence before something can be considered, and hypotheses are only considered if composed in good knowledgeable detail, or from educated people. Imagination plays no part in science. You try tell a scientist you think we came from bubbles or that you know the theory of evidence, but most of it relies on things that don't abide by the logic of science.

tl;dr, no, science is not imaginative, those people just were.

>>2000797
How does one 'imagine'? (and nice application of knowledge, the opposite of knowledge, onto imagination. I'ma apply imagination to knowledge now: "You talk a load of fucking shit")

>>2000779
What is imagination then? (awaiting knowledge (the opposite of imagination) application)

This would evidently prove that humanity is enslaved into a single thought process (knowledge) and if science decides to mix with imagination, they will attempt to abolish it, destroying our freedom of thought and not allowing us to take the route we wanted to; alike the red and blue pill in the matrix except we are force fed the blue pill to make society work for advancement purposes – which inevitably forces us further away from each other, inducing hatred, torment and depression. Such a meaningful existence toned down to chemicals and insignificance. We can imagine what the universe is like, and in our brains we can travel to the depths unreachable by technology – but according to science we are nothing but a tiny spec in the vast black void we know as space. Surely if it’s possible to live with such vigour and wonder we should? For humanity and for the children of the future, this obviously would be the better path to take. The meaningless of the modern scientific approach is disgusting and should be converted into one that holds significance, one that would enlighten each and every child born into a world that’s truly worth living upon. If we can imagine anything in the universe that abides to the cubic nature, then surely the universe is not infinite – as described in the Rational Belief article at www.cubicao.com.

Anyway, I'll be back soon with the final copy and with more information. I'll make this the best one yet.

>>2000670
No it doesn't. If science does not combine with religion then it cannot combine with imagination. Fact.

>>2000193
You think your adult educated mind is actually natural evolution rather than the result of concentration camps.

>>2000161
I know exactly how the brain works.
Words are concepts,
You think in words.
The thoughts you receive are inevitably a product of your environment. You have free will as you ARE time, you tick, and everything else ticks. Time (the dimension) doesn't. Soul implies free will -- the connection between heart and brain.

Evolution of the mind is progressive lexis and semantics, it's not at all complex, it's structured. If you conduct experiments on the brain that focus on the educated EGO product, then you're doing lience (science but lies).

"this is why you think about cats"

No it's not. The word cat is why I think about cats, and because I have it in my memory I can CHOOSE (soul) to think about it.

You so dumb.
So really dumb, fo real.

Anyhow, I must get to work on today's Deep and
Edgy magazine.

>>2000092
That's the point, we aren't, but that's what your science makes you believe. The idea that times a dimension is the ONLY thing that supports humans having no soul -- the number 'one' is the only thing supporting your view on existence and insignificance, and 'one' doesn't exist in reality.

You're dumb, you're teachers are dumb, you do not understand ANYTHING.