/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2557294

I also debated that, considering hadrons are composite, and fermions and bosons are elementary, but leptons are also parts of fermions, and leptons do not make up hadrons. I could split them up into hadrons (subsection: quarks), bosons, and leptons, but then I'd still have the odd composite/elementary thing going.

Plus I really want to make quarks, leptons, and hadrons stand out on their own. Bosons were sort of just an extra.

>>2557199

I thought about that, I don't know why my notes say 'Guage'. Changing it right now.

>>2557184

Yup @ >>2557208

>>2557212

Hadrons, bosons, and fermions, you're right, but I wanted to make a clear distinction between quarks and leptons. Should I have the overall fermionic connection between leptons and quarks?

>>2557242

Well, if you're up to it at any time..

This version is probably less shitty.

This version is probably less shitty.

Pic related.

Does this look good? Not for the aesthetics, I made it in MS Paint. I mean, does it include everything needed for subatomic particles, and in the right order?

I didn't want to put hypothetical particles or antiparticles, though I did make exceptions where the particle was pertinent (such as with the Higgs boson, and the positron).

That would burn the cats nose, would it not?

>>2100638

Yes, hence why I didn't put in any values for radii or diameters, considering the question including none of that information.

>>2100597
>>2100611

The question does not ask for the volume of the cylinder removed, but rather the volume of a sphere with volume removed by a 'drill' of sorts that is cylindrical shaped that ran through the center of the sphere.

>>2100591

That's true.

V=[(4/3)πr^3]-([πR^3h]+[(πH^2/3)(3r-H)])

r=radius of the sphere
R=radius of the cylinder
h=height of the cylinder
H=height of the curved 'caps'

I had to look up the formula for the volume of the curved 'caps', so that part may not be reliable, but I thought it was better than just saying V=(volume of sphere)-[(volume of cylinder)+(volume of curved 'caps')].

Is this some homework?

>>2100523

V=[(4/3)π(radius of sphere)^3]-[π(radius of cylinder)^3(height of cylinder)]

>>2100557

http://tinyurl.com/2ffrap5

>>2100537

>>2100506

Haha, genius!

So what's with all the NASA budget threads in /sci/?

You'd break your particle accelerator.

Bamp.

So, I just read "Quarks: The Stuff of Matter" by Harald Fritzsch, which I picked up from my college's library. Unfortunately, it's as old as the dinosaurs (well, from 1982 or something), and I have a few questions about what may have been solved from the writing of the book, to now:

1. Have we directly observed gluons? I don't mean actually "seeing" gluons, but like observing their effects in a particle accelerator or something.

2. Do we know why the W boson only couples with left-handed leptons and quarks, and completely ignored the right-handed ones (in relation to parity)?

Thanks.

So everyone missed how OP said "hypothetical situation"?

>>1776468

This.

Hey, Astronomy guy here. Just giving some love for Astronomy, even though I have no pictures.

Keep it coming!

>>1776485

I'll go with this one, but the idea OP had is somewhat theoretically workable, I'd think.

I love all the "Why not?"s in this thread. It's beautiful.

>>1757683

OOOOOOOOOOOOOH. -Now- it makes sense, thanks. :D

I fuckin' love math.