/sci/ - Science & Math

copper and iron

>>2825812

This 'Taleb distribution' came to me natrually when testing. I didn't know it was official so thanks for referencing that.

>>2825666

nice trips, I've already lost with this a couple of times (see pic) but I still managed to recover...I think that's the beauty of this algorithim.

>>2825681

Martingdale is a dangerous progression...it has the tendency to wipe out your entire bankroll eventually. Furthermore, with that betting method you would have to risk 512 units in order to gain 1 unit. Plus roulette tables having betting limits

>>2825691
>>2825713
lol

>>2825637

RNG is a no go zone, the results are actual real time betting results using a live wheel.

>>2825619
look at op's pic stupid

>>2825620
My point exactly, the algorithim is designed for long-term, most roulette systems out there make you win in the short-term but eventually the random-ness of the wheel will destroy their bankroll

>>2825607

it can be, but I'm sticking with single zero for obvious reasons.

double zero is a no go zone

>>2825593

I'm pretty sure I know what it's for bro, it's there for an approx 2.7% house edge for singly zero wheels. and roughly 5% and double zero wheels.

regardless, my graph contradicts this.

>>2825588

it focuses on number patterns.

the reason why I am not releasing it just yet is because I am still slightly tweaking it.

>>2825563
yes, I did post when I had around 500 spins, the general response was long-run is going to fall.

but as you can see I am doing quite well.

>>2825570
I was seriously thinking about doing this, but then thought, they would probably ban me since I am using a system and not 'gambling'.

>>2825546
the zero is included

>>2825556
your quite right actually...it's not perfect, but it's pretty damm close.

>>2825524

Not at this moment in time, but once I make 5k I will realise it so everyone can milk those casino's dry.

However, I would be interested your opinions on the game of roulette.

>>2825508

>lies

im flattered you don't believe me, make your opinions on roulette all you like but that's pure evidence.

Roulette...is now beaten

pic very related, I achieved 1000 real spins with my algorithim and made just under 2500, that's 2.4 units every spin.

for anyone who didn't get the graph

>>2659420

yes I said that already bro

>>2659411

that'll take years, however if I am still winning it will all be recorded bro.

>>2659378

I agree, the more spins the better, I am struggling to think of an explanation mathematiclly to this, but eventually I will reach 10000 spins while making money when I do they'll be a printscreen with your name on it.

>>2659356

I can, and I might consider it, but I need the following:

RX coding knowlege
a PURE RNG

the first one can be gained, but I have the problem with the latter, is the RNG you recommend good?

>>2659339

not really you can argue it's not long-term as I only have 500+ spins, but then you can also argue:

long term = infinite

like I said the system is not perfect, but I really think it does have potential,

btw it's likely gamblers won't be able to use my system since it requires patience and concentration. In other words once they lose a progression or go under their bankroll...they would instantly dismiss it.

>>2659329
>>2659325

ok bro, I hear your advice, but note I am still on the testing phrase despite it being real money. I will update you guys on this board monthly

>>2659309
>>2659299

even though I am playing real, I am still testing. once I finished testing and made a bit out of it, i'll then consider giving it out.

if I post it and eventual testing shows that it is flawed, you will lose aswell...I can't have that on my conscious.

>>2659292
>>2659290

I started off with 1000 and once I reached the 2000 mark I withdrawn 1000 units,

so in other words I got my money back and the only thing I might be wasting is time.

>>2659259
>incorrect rules

playing at an online casino

>not random

live wheel

>full of shit

that actually gives me more confidence, thanks bro.

>>2659260
Martindale progression is bad I agree with you, I don't use it.