/sci/ - Science & Math

the science behind chance

when atheists are too stupid to realize theyre trolling each other, yet think theyre trolling religion, just sit back and watch the dumbest most easily trolled religion on earth

vegetarianism for moral reasons is retarded but for health reasons it is indeed good, i love meat too much so i just try as best as possible

because liberals give them free shit when they do, obviously

shittiest site on the net

>>4077459
by posting in this thread you concede to his premise, otherwise why would you be trying to disprove what he said?

>>4077437
why are you so adamant about believing the only possible thing that can be outside a universe is another universe? theres really no reason to believe this unless they collect more evidence (such as the patterns they do know of increasing at a similar rate to our universes expansion)

>>4077420
only atheists think they automatically win arguments by using words "rational" or "magical sky wizardz"

>>4077406
>hurr durr if i use the word rationalz i already win the argument my atheist religion never failz

>>4077380
you cant verify a multiverse with "circular patterns in the cosmic microwave background"

thats my point. "the researchers think that its because we bumped into other universes" is not evidence of a multiverse. its just a label out of ignorance, just like dark energy.

>>4077349
if youre grand grand father thought the earth was flat, youre probably black

and you cant be sure, obviously. atheists just like to believe there is some law which states "absence of evidence is evidence of absence"

>>4077346
>suggesting minor collisions with other universes

lolno

>strong gravitational worth existing outside our universe

not evidence for a multiverse

>>4077280
and there should also be a law that uneducated atheists cant use the word "nothing" unless they know what it means (atheists canl often be seen claiming particles can appear out of nothing for example, showing how little they actually know about quantum physics)

furthermore it should be illegal for butthurt atheists to claim infinite universe "theory" (lol no evidence) is worth anything more than the theory of a god

>>4066009
>hurr durr the evidence must not be considered because his intentions were bad

>>4065972
studying quantum physics was not what he was claiming is difficult. the truth that quantum mechanics is alluding to is whats difficult to comprehend.

dumb ass

>>4065997
atheists brought up religion, as usual. they talk more about religion than religious people themselves. my name is just a name, deal with it.

>>4065909
im pretty fucking sure the mechanism was one of the central points to OPs fucking post you delusional homosexual apologist for all things SCIENZZZ HURR DURRR

>>4065899
faulty argument. the truth is that people change language. sometimes its natural, sometimes its intentional.

kind of like how dawkins redefines the word atheism and tried to convince everyone the 'agnostic atheist theist' paradigm is wrong

truly, these are the worst types of disingenuous scumbags on earth. this is liberal atheist propaganda 101 (notice, they changed the term global warming into 3 different things, its climate change now) and liberals have changed their names about 20 times (progressive > liberal > now theyre using "left libertarian")

>>4065861
>hurr durr stop denying scientifix fax they r scientifix fax cuz da scienz said so no time for disproving ur argument, im just sad cuz u dont believe tru fax

>>4065833
there is not enough evidence to support the theory, and even if there was it wouldnt make the premise true. it would only make the premise seemingly accurate.

again, describe your premise.

>>4065821
>It causes the atmosphere to retain heat.

fallacy #1. there is no proof of this global phenomenon, you are extrapolating this claim from small controlled observations and experiments.

>We are also darkening the atmosphere via burning coal, and our release of CO2 and other chemicals has complex effects on many natural atmospheric systems.

unproven

>The release of CO2 can create negative feedback loops that warm the earth ever more quickly-see the melting of Arctic sea ice and the increased absorption of heat by the water due to its low albedo.

unproven assumption based on faulty premise

>This warming can have negative repercussions in climactic patterns, disrupting agriculture and ecosystems, and could result in dramatic increases in sea level over the next century that transform our coastlines.

negative is a subjective term. you dont draw conclusions from your feelings or opinions. also, you have a faulty assumption based on false premises

>>4065815
so when he says "the premise is still true" hes just casually letting us know this (allegedly irrelevant, according to you) information for absolutely no reason? that doesnt make sense. the only possible reason he (you) has to bring up such a thing is because he is claiming that the premise in and of itself is sufficient.

either way, i asked what premise he (you) was talking about so that we can have a bit more clarity, because im willing to bet it isnt true either.

>>4065800
no he said the premise is still true as if to say the premise in and of itself is sufficient, and it is not. learn to reading comprehension