/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9930511
kek

>>9930521
You are asking for it.

Also, data does not lie.
Climate is changing (and it always has been).

The questions remaining are:
>Did we cause it?
>Can we reverse it?
>Can we survive it?


Personally, I don't give a fuck and truly want to see the world burn before I die.

Good riddance, it was fun while it lasted.

90% of the population is worthless anyway...

space

If the MWI holds true, there is no such thing as a "Time Paradox:.

Hence, by Occam's razor, if Time-Travel is possible, WMI is probably true.

[math]\hat{H}| \psi(t) \rangle = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} | \psi (t) \rangle[/math]

>>9188747
The distortion pattern happens because a single photon goes through both slits. Like quantum superposition. If there is one slit, he photon goes through it and does interfere with its superposed self, hence no distortion.

If you have a better explanation for the distortion pattern, I'd like to hear it.

>>9186055
This

>>9184863
I play fast music to increase norepinephrine, and slow music to reduce cortisol.

>>9186240
Id invest in safe nuclear, including fusion.

>>9186295
I meant future.

>>9186280
Not exactly sure, but more massive black holes have a larger event horizon.
I don't know how this affects the internal geometrical/physical properties of the black hole, I think the more massive the black hole, the singularity is further away in the past.

>>9186248
5, look again

>>9186266
Yes, but the point would only be infinitesimally small in 3D space. It would be a really long "funnel" in 4D space-time.

>>9178011
Like anything that affects neurotransmitters and/or it's transporters, you build tolerance.

Besides, so much norepinephrine could elevate your risk of stroke and/or hearth failure.

>>9174324
Not consciously, but deep down that's the reason men act different around woman.

>>9174311
He's not being optimistic, it was a pathetic attempt at flattering in the hope that she would notice and have sex with him.

>>9174203
There is such thing as true random though, for example in radioactive decay.

>>9173559
You have to understand that most of us are virgins with little chance of ever getting laid.

Any chance is our best shot.

Use your powers responsibly, (or not, I'm not a moralfag).

>>9174104
I get your point, its nothing more than hypothetical pondering.

Things like quantum uncertainty seem to suggest that maybe electrons move in 4D space (see one electron universe, but without the"one" part). Then, if they do move in 4D spacetime, where are they when they are not "here"? Other time? Why not same time, other space?

In the other hand, causality/determinism hardcore believers like you fail to thing beyond. You might be right absolutely right. But if it was up to people like that, and there was no "rebels", we would still be navigating carefully no to fall off the edge of the planet...

Shit and Murphy is a 2/10 show, but that doesn't disprove MWI.

All possibilities exist.

Considere this, time is a spatial dimension (4D), but we can only "see" an infinitesimal "slice" of it (3D space). In the 5D plane, all timelines (4D) are just sides of the same object.

I'll try to formulate a better explanation, but this is the basics of it afaiu.

[math]\mathfrak{PHENOTYPE}[/math]

>>9168353
Fucked my trip

>>9165843
Are you me?

>Wrote a genetic algorithm to replicate an image using polygons (like evolisa) while procrastinating instead of doing my final lab report for freshman physics

>failed freshman physics

Pic related