/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3634456
The wider community. The new brothel owner bought it off some kike. Are you autistic? Just give me an answer. You don't care how far a society degenerates as long it follows your incredibly ignorant shallow principles.

>>3634419
You are obviously struggling with this scenario. Let's say that everybody in the community besides the brothel owners and its patorns that come from out of town oppose the existence of the brothel. Do they just have to deal with it because to do otherwise would be violating some mystical principle?
>I support basic free movement of people
So a sudden influx of 20 million Africans to Finland or Sweden or Britain wouldn't worry you? Will cultural peoples simply have to be perpetually running?

>>3634378
It was implied that they don't own the brothel or whatever. They are concerned that it will ruin their once harmonic community.

What do you think about multiculturalism and immigration? Should we have to celebrate our cultural suicide because to do otherwise would violate your holy libertarian principles?

>>3634329
What do you think about parents who control and discipline their children? What do you think about communities that don't want drug dealers and brothels in their community?

>>3634306
You know that they don't define coercion that way, and it's a pretty big abstraction from the real definition of coercive too.

>>3634271
You remind me of somebody who would whip themselves for thinking sinful thoughts.

I SHAN'T CONTROLL ANYBODY! THE STATE IS EVIL! I SHAN'T! I SHAN'T!

Think for yourself - An action isn't necessarily good or life affirming just because it's herp derp voluntary.

>>3634206
My point is that the modern state system is not the root cause of all our maladies, the problem is societal and cultural.

It's possible for certain behaviour to be restricted and managed but not by the state, or do you believe that family and community relationships are coercive too?

You won't even discuss the possibility of people not being able to do whatever life destroying activity they want because it doesn't fit in with your shallow ideology.

>>3634160
That's not an answer.

See, internet liberatarians don't actually try to argue the point, they erect a strawman and try to beat it down with a mises.com talking point, because they haven't even read meaningful libertarian books.

Have you considered that freedom is much more than a sliding scale?

>>3634085
The modern state isn't the problem, it's a symptom, of mass dissolution and anomie. We have lost all our values, principles, myths and traditions and now we are lost.

Libertarianism is an incredibly shallow ideology. It's analysis is incorrectly purely economic and atomistic. It ignores the fact that complex hierarchial structures form and that people obviously don't know what is best for themselves. Eg, the solution to the drug problem isn't simply to legalise it, the problem runs much deeper than that.

Civilisation necessitates strong leadership and hierarchies. Anarchism is a childish and destructive ideology.

>>3594149
>New aged spirtuality
FTFY

It's not only leftists that believe that the world is overpopulated. Infrastructure and resources are being increasingly stretched, the urban sprawl is increasing,crime will increase (especially with birth demographics the way they are), the environment will be destroyed etc. It's not ideal in the slightest, just because we could do it doesn't mean we should.
>>3594069
The problem is most of them are stupid and can't help themselves. As soon as the teat is milked they will all die.

>>3494609
I agree with you about vaccines. Don't be so quick to write me off. Care respond to my other points? You are intelligent person and I would love to discuss this with you.

>>3494463
Tragedy of the commons, externalities etc are problems of public property.

Differing time preferences is the reason we have wages, loans, interest etc. If everybody had the same time preferences then there would be nobody to advance money.

Freak times like bank runs? Your solution is to have the state act as a lender of last resort, which has the consequences of banks having no incentive to practice sound policy.

>>3320027
No, they don't. You've never even looked at an economics textbook. Atlas Shrugged isn't an economics book.

>>3320000
In economics, rational doesn't mean that a person acts the way you want them to.

Just imagine a world with no niggers. This vision of the future looks much better than your assimilation of backward cultures and peoples.

Let R be a ring with 1, and let J be an ideal of R containing 1. Show that J=R.

>>3233780
>>3233810
>>3234058
Scum.

Oh, and try and convince your class to try (if you go to a shitty school) because your SACs may be moderated up. But in the end you can't lose any points because of it.

The maths/science part is easy. The only thing you might have trouble with is the writing tasks if writing doesn't come easily to you.

>>3228182
The living standards under colonisation were the highest they ever were. The colonists brought civility to those monkeys.
>>3228195
>3)Free market capitalism as a basis for society rather than an element of it
There are very few people who actually support free market capitalism now. I hope we'll see a progression to where it is accepted.

debauched homosexuality
alcohol and drug use
obesity
religion
a large chunk of diseases

one can hope

I would have hoped the chairs would be more comfy

theta+log(tan theta+sec theta)