/sci/ - Science & Math

>I mean, there's 33.34% chance of being right

>>4692128
It would be better if you posted this on fucking reddit, because that's the kind of place it belongs. And I'm not talking about the good sub-reddits either, I'm talking about shit like /r/funny or /r/fffffffuuu

I just went here because I remembered enjoying the serious discussion and lack of people such as yourself, but the very first thing I was presented with was your thread. So yeah, by again.

Beer.

reported

>>>/tv/
>>>/b/

>>4136529
Giga electronvolt..?

The stream is seriously lagging for me.

I'm more annoyed with people who misuse i.e.

amnesic/amnestic?

>>4083319
I think the usual argument about this is that in your example, both portals are moving while in OP's only one is.

>>>/mu/

>>3983921
I'm pretty sure the one that's usually posted goes

A) 25%
B) 50%
C) 0%
D) 25%

Which makes it more paradoxical.

0%.

I thought it was just because gingers have lower levels of melatonin. Simply another mutation, much like albinism or even green eyes.

But we pay for the adrenaline and endorphine kick.

>>3974807
Excellent. I have never had any kind of remote interest in geophysics before, but this thread, and you, make it worthwhile. Thanks for a great thread.

But what about stuff that has similar density? You wouldn't be able to tell them apart with these methods.

You develop cancer-like tumours and die.

>>3746434
One could only dream that /sci/ would go back to the way it was a couple of months after it was unleashed upon the public, full of knowledgeable people sharing their knowledge and discussing with the average Joe, all in civilized manner.

OP, if you haven't already, I highly recommend you read "The Mind's I". The very first chapter constitutes of exactly this kind of problem, and several of the other chapters deal with self-conciousness and the like.

It doesn't provide any answers of course, and will probably just raise a lot more questions.

http://www.superliminal.com/cube/cube.htm

>>3130336
I'm just saying it's dumb.

>>3127969
Why would they suddenly change the exterior (as compared to modern cars) so drastically just because it runs on a different kind of fuel?