/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2592706

I don't deal with sociology in general. But I'm nearly sure that it's a serious science. It's just your perception of these matters is obfuscated by the flourish of hurr-durr-I-can't-do-math-but-I'm-smart-wannabe-sociologist people.


>>2592708

I'm from Europe and I have to differ. Perhaps you are right that in America the scale of the movement is indeed great. But it's noticeable here.

>>2592688

Well... If some men have been toying with the whole humanity for a long time I beg to say they are men of capabilities and intelligence. Not to mention They control nuclear arsenal.

Sociological issue.

We all know the 'anti-NWO' thingy. The question is, why's that? Is it some sort of paranoia? The general idea is that, for at least nearly 100 years, there's been a group of people responsible for various worldwide tragedies such as wars, economic crises etc. Also, allegedly, they have plans greatly exceeding their completed deeds.

Let's assume it to be true.

A man of a sound mind knows that any resistance is futile since Their power is unmatched. They control the world. A reasonable thing to do would be to try to join Them. Why the 'anti-NWO' movement, then? It can't succeed. It's obvious. Are the members of the agitation, then, lunatics? But these are not some isolated cases. It's become some sort of a trend.

Any resistance is futile.

>>2509085

Hurr, durr I just learned in school what probability distribution and density function are, hurr durr, me so smart. Random, in this usage, is with direct relation to a certain probability density function, u fuckwit.

>>2509042

Fcuking moron. The logical problems of different sorts occur if there is no correct answer and when there are 'too many' correct answers.

Go logic, go.

Well. Indeed /thread already. Fu.

>>2487765

Depending where you are comma or dot may be correct. Oh boy.

What to remember? Conservation of momentum: for isolated system momentum is constant. And momentum is m*v (generally v is vector).

For energy same but with energy. Here we got only kinetic energy and it's m*v^2/2

Where is ur god now? I bet you cannot find the mistake.

>>2485455

That's why I eat it.

>>2485422

Well. Quite simple. Ban on meat cause there is no biological need to eat so much of it and every kind and animals suffer.

And disregard for global ecology cause of natural selection. Regard for it would require effort from the whole world and in reality it would mean increasing costs of energy production or limiting production of goods which would decrease growth and development of a country. This is very unstable. If some country decides to fuck the rest up, like USA and China do today, then they will develop faster than e.g. continent of leftists idiots (Europe) and ultimately will be able to fuck everyone else up in any other way.

>>2485375

I'm not in high school, my friend.

Mhmm. I'm not 'developing' anything. I'm just looking for a name for sth I've already had.

Write manifesto? Well... You would be writing it for someone to read. And since I despise great majority of people for them being mindless, evil cattle and would like to see them suffer I will have to say 'no'.

>>2485254
>>2485266

Well, as I can see, there are simple trolls or idiots. Either way answering to their primary school arguments is not worth my time. Mhmm. So no1?

>>2485240

well,

with perspective*

more like

>>2485228

White, young, not privileged, with perspectives.

- Public health care limited to loans for the poorest for medical treatment

- Public education limited to 2-3 national tests that everyone has to take (to ensure that parents are not some fuckwits that decided not to educate their children). Also loans for the ones who want to study faculties important for the country.

- No income tax. Absolutely no taxation of energy and fuels. Ideally, money should be coming from VAT on luxury or semi-luxury goods (like games, movies, good cars etc. etc).

- Absolutely no prohibition on drugs.

- Abortion, gay adoption, etc.

- No arbitrarily imposed limits of age in the law.

- Disregard for global ecology.

- No capital punishment for anything. No imprisonment (with some exceptions). The punishment would be exile or, if the perpetrator wished so, prison (of course one would have to pay for living there). The exceptions are e.g. spies or generally no letting out people whose freedom would be a danger to the state. Also if someone would sneak in after being exiled also a prison would be the solution.

- Ban on meat of nearly all animals (possibly it'd be legal to kill certain kinds of fish only).

- No driving license etc. If you want to and know how to drive - drive. But if you cause an accident or seriously breach the rules of the road than be prepared to face considerable consequences.

Hi, hi. I came here for advice. The question is: what am I politically-wise? I used to call myself libertarian, or to be more precise, minarchist or classical liberal. But tbh they don't really fit and I have no knowledge to look for the answer effectively. So i thought maybe you could help me. Here are some of my most important views (note that they relate to an idea of perfect or nearly perfect country and I'm putting aside the possibility of implementing them) :

- High disdain for democracy, monarchism, dictatorship etc., etc. I support the idea of 'democracy among the qualified ones' - in other words: to vote you need certain education.

- Great 'yes' for capitalism but not radical one. If needed, for certain profits, the state should subsidize the greatest international companies owned by the people of this country in order to ensure the world domination of the company. Also some of the unfortunate ones, only potentially productive tho, should receive loans from the state if they happen to become unemployed and lack resources to live.

>>2475416

Simplification on my side. Naturally, everything has objective causation if it has any causation. Nevertheless, if we consider only local reason, meaning confined to biased motivations (we are discussing sentient beings) then we'll end up with different interpretations of the same fact resulting in different motivations and therefore causations for the same action.

>>2475341

Ofc it is. Putting aside the fact that what I gave here is not philosophy.

>>2475335

need*

>>2475324

>> implying that objective actions needs objective causation

What's right, what's wrong?

As we know, there is no objective right or wrong and it's utterly dependent on one's biased perception of moral value of a given action. This is quite obvious fact, but 'sadly', considering the fact that vast majority of humanity is mindless cattle, it's unknown to nearly everyone. Which results in the situation in which ppl, as the whole, act accordingly to some loosely evolutionarily determined sense of righteousness.

The question is, who leads them? The answer would be - the fittest. In this case the fittest means the most intelligent devoid of strong atavistic need to act accordingly to mentioned sense of righteousness.

This leads us to the conclusion that the humanity is led by the 'evil' men, that its laws are, probably, wicked. The question is: is that so? What would be the evidence? Considering right the assumption that the somewhat smartest rule us and the fact that intelligent people are indeed very capable to confirm my thesis I would need to find laws/regulations that are clearly primitive in the sense of potentially ideal society. Can I do this? Naturally. All over the world. Drug prohibition, leftists economic solutions etc., etc.

So what is the conclusion? It's pretty much obvious that we live in the world of idiots controlled by a group of capable pragmatic cynics. And I would like to ask you, what do you do about it? I mean how can you live among the cattle? The only solution I find is hatred. Which is quite tiring. Umm?

>>2463479

What happens if someone crashes on regular track? Besides if someone would crash he would fall down on the 'floor'. And everyone is supposed to drive on the ceiling.

>>2463413

I'm pretty sure it would be billions. You would need new technology of making such tubes (no company in the world would be able to produce it just like it, i guess). Not to mention the whole process of design and research. New safety regulations. Materials, licenses, insurance etc. etc. etc.