[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.6053857 [View]

It's difficult to prove that modern day intellectuals and scientists are evil. I found out the other day that we can be touched, spiritually, but again, this is difficult to prove. The ways in which modern day scientists and intellectuals touch white children AND adults is disgusting. If people knew the ways in which you were manipulating parts of their bodies and sexually abusing them you wouldn't be so safe and secure behind your walls of lies. For one, I'd like you to remove your fingers from my gooch.

>> No.6053855 [DELETED]  [View]

It's difficult to prove that modern day intellectuals and scientists are evil. I found out the other day that we can be touched, spiritually, but again, this is difficult to prove. The ways in which modern day scientists and intellectuals touch white children AND adults is disgusting. If people knew the ways in which you were manipulating parts of their bodies and sexually abusing them you wouldn't be so safe and secure behind your walls of life's. For one, I'd like you to remove your fingers from my gooch.

>> No.6053849 [View]

>>6053842
And you accept it because you scored enough.

>> No.6053843 [View]

>>6053839
Indeed.

Here's an interesting fact. A human may relate to the Sun. The alpha male system is a bit more complex in human nature than it is in that of let's say a lion or other animal, but this human behaviour is related directly to the Sun as it acts as the center for planets and such. A human has beauty that can be perceived, in the same manner as light projected from the Sun. Although more basic, the Sun leads a similar life to a human, but each of their terms of reference are distinct, so that their lifes appear to be different.

There are many special relations things can have between things when observing natural langauge. We can understand their complexity, but by using the complexities in ourselves that are relative. It wouldn't be word-based understanding, but something more natural.

>> No.6053835 [View]

>>6053833
>And: Do you assume that there is only one meaning attached to each entity ?
Yes I do, because everything is living in the same universe; nature has a greater intelligence or wisdom of different properties, meanings are written with a different code than writing, so we could never write the true answer. However, I do not believe that these meanings are restricted to a singularity, and there are individual traits that make up things like the Sun; it's meaning would not be one of these things, but all of these things.

>> No.6053830 [View]

>>6053823
Both 1 and 2.

I say that life has meaning, but the individuals are of a different intelligence to human-intelligence. In your example, the Sun exists for the sake of the planet, is not a definite answer, but that's one you understood when you observed the Sun interacting with the Earth. There is only one correct answer, and that is the whole character, yes it does have meaning but because we used meaning to ask the question, it indicts us as stupid.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”

>> No.6053816 [View]

I'm here simply to strip from most of you so called intellectuals and scientists your intelligence. The only reason your intelligence seems fortified is because you were taught through rote-education a complex language that is enjoyable and only the experts can understand it; and it's so difficult to explain to you how stupid you are because you have tons of false evidence you believe in and wouldn't turn a blind eye to for anything in the world, because if that were true, you wouldn't be intelligent. Modern intellectuals and scientists are purely egotistical, you won't accept the rock the builders reject, because then builders lose their credibility.

>> No.6053807 [View]

>>6053792
>>6053776
What are you like fourty years old? Probably a teacher. You spend your whole life buzzing off the fact someone finds you intelligent. You love having yourself appear as above other people. You're a nutcase, and you're destroying the planet. How you act is very depressing to look at. Luckily it's easy to ignore, unfortunately you are not slaughtered like the walking hot-head pig you are.

>> No.6053802 [View]

>>6053792
>>6053776
Urgh, look how nihilistic your actions are, purely to cause mental depression; you hope that others won't take notice. You don't do this for yourself, you do this to prevent others becoming enlightened to the fact your "quantum physics" PhD is a load of bullshit. Though it does get you money so bravo.

>> No.6053796 [View]

>>6053792
>>6053776
Samefag, and you are just a nihilistic pseudo-scientist trying to suppress intellectual discussion, and reinforce currency-based slave-intelligence.

>> No.6053784 [View]

What is 'reason', what is 'purpose' in the most purest way? What I'm doing is debating whether our common values are correct; why does the reason for something have to be more than what it does at present? Is it not clear enough a reason prior to asking the question, "does life have reason?"? What is the reason stars exist? Stars are bright, maybe we can come to the conclusion that they were meant to be bright, but that doesn't escape the fact that they were already bright, and the pure brightness which you learned exists, the stars themselves, wouldn't this be their meaning, instead of our theories that revolve around the moments we have had with the stars.

The Sun is what the Sun is while you are sensing it, you shouldn't assume it has the same intelligence as humans do where it has the choice to do what it wants. There is no round about meaning for everything. It is what it is. It means what it means. The fact that you are alive is ultra-significant, you have meaning right this second, and every time you do anything you mean to do it, in some way shape or form. What does the Sun mean? Surely, it's sensual characteristics, what we can sense from the Sun. Why do we presume it may have an moral objective like humans do, why do we assume both the Sun and humans are the same intelligence?

>> No.6053756 [View]
File: 270 KB, 680x553, 4a3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6053756

What do we mean when we use the term "meaning" in this context? Everything has value (i.e. I have eyes, a body, etc); there is a constant stream for you to sense. Do we mean this value? If yes, the question "Is there meaning to life", is answered- yes, there is sensual meaning (colors, forms, shapes, actions, etc). Or do we mean something else?

>> No.6044663 [View]

It has meaning, because you can select a meaning, and how you can select one is due to the ancestry of subjects, those who set the limits on what we can conquer-- every subject has a penultimate ancestor(s) who serve as the most basic representations of things, like Air and the Mind. Air is the penultimate ancestor of the Mind. The Air on Earth acts somewhat like the Mind does as it interacts with the Earth. Although the two are not exactly the same, they are in a conceptual sense. This would be the most basic meaning of the Mind, what would that mean? That you should use your mind as if it was like Air, to serve as the best representation of it, or to the maximum of your ability; studying Air might help you control your Mind with greater ease and skill. It has metaphysical meaning as well as normal meaning; it is like Air and Air heritage in form and function, and it can be like other things that were made possible by Air.

>> No.6044657 [View]

Air can be a representative of the Mind. Air is clear like human consciousness, and it can become clouded as the sky is filled with clouds, our human-psyche as a whole are most alike Air. I think that Air's Spirit is our minds home. Before we can have a mind that is alike Air, it must have had existed as a ancestor. The Mind has meaning, it has a long line of ancestry, and can only act in a number of different ways in correlation to the skills it inherited from its ancestors. The Mind acts and is formed most like Air, because of it's function, it was most coherent to Air, that's why nature chose the Air Spirit for the mind. We can represent any activity in the Mind by using the Air and Air Life. Things can be made simpler, and meaning can be taken from everything, because everything can live up to it's representation only. There are limits imposed, the Mind can only be alike Air, and can only do what Air can do, hypothetically speaking.

The Mind can be calm like still air, and it can be angry like strong winds, you can have a bright idea represented by the Sun, or something could be annoying you like a hot-spot in the mind, It can be clouded-- like after parties, you wake up groggy from the night before. These and more are what it is limited to due to it's Air heritage (it can only experience the types of things Air can experience). Thus, it means the Mind can mean "similar to Air", as well as others in the Air ancestry, and amongst other meanings, like to control the body.

>> No.6044643 [View]
File: 8 KB, 250x232, k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6044643

Is there meaning to life?

>> No.6043927 [View]

>>6043919
Of course we do, we evolved from Monkeys.

>> No.6043916 [View]

bump

>> No.6043846 [View]
File: 16 KB, 100x100, Halloween-Sora.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6043846

Does evolution occur, during or after a burst of adrenaline rushes?

>> No.6042000 [View]
File: 22 KB, 640x480, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6042000

bump

>> No.6041818 [View]
File: 26 KB, 640x480, 11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6041818

>>6041798
Let's say I was explaining what it is to be insane, but I was explaining insanity in such a harmonious way that my intelligence was above your sane state of mind.

>> No.6041747 [View]

It's a good question.

>> No.6041737 [View]

>>6041733
>from now on focused on one corner
>was just speaking truth

>> No.6041729 [View]

>>6041724
Actually, it's the difference between taking notice of what you are saying and analyzing what you're doing with your hands (plus other body parts).

>> No.6041711 [View]

>>6041698
That's not why we do at all, that is how we came to write from left to right, not why we do. Why we do is because left and right are opposites, and to make sense of the word (or as a cubic intellectual would say, worship one corner), we have to choose one as the starting point and one as the ending point, since what we write must make sense, or equate something (equate to one 010101, as cubics say). The only way to cause this division is to pick one side as the beginning.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]