/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10587811
Because mother nature doesn't work for free. It's not your personal army. What's there is what's there and it's your job to move it from one place to the next. Where would the perpetual motion come from? Where would it go? Magic? Itself? Illogical.

>>10588397
A magnet is a magnet, just like a rock is a rock and iron is iron. If you can't align rocks or plain iron into something that makes energy then why would you think magnets would do the same? Because they have larger more noticeable fields? So what? The rocks and plain iron do too, they don't do anything special.

>>10588561
You have just described 3 phase power. You still need a prime mover of something burning/churning. Pressure difference must be created to be utilized.

>>10588518
>it's a force

It's a property of something else. You name it and it has magnetism.

>>10595095
It blows the fuck up you idiot.

>>10577997
Oh look, yet another Pakistani scamming youtube and crystal magnet retards for ad money.

>Is free energy really impossible or are they just hiding it from us

Who is "they"? What do you mean by "free energy"? Like a free candybar? No you have to pay/ work for those.

>>10573579
The flow of negative charge
>inb4 what is charge/what is flow

"Negative charge" of what? Is a "flow" a "force"?

>>10573570
That's not an answer. What is electricity? How does it work? If you can explain this then people would believe that it's "electric" more.

>>10573378
>>10573500
>>10573561
What is "electricity"?

>>10524088
>Are you a metaphysician when it comes to quantification of things

Hahahahahaahahahaa

>>10522345
>fix trannys
in some circumstances they're already "fixed".

>with science
"science" now tells you there's nothing wrong with them despite holding contradictory claims before it became a meme to be a tranny. According to them, you can't fix what isn't broke right?
Welcome to clown world.

>>10518452
properties are properties. Ice has the property of being cold but "cold" is not a thing in itself.

>>10519767
It's an action of a field.

>>10519078
Hope your being paid to repost this. Time is money.

>>10518675
>interpretations make things real
No

>>10516213
>>10516216
Never trust historians, only trust historiographers.

>>10516755
So does history apparently. How do you account for the fact that transgender is no longer considered a mental disorder?
>Oh well you see this book learned idiot that belonged to a low percentage of the population and had some connections and made a few changes to it
>Oh well you see these doctors can make a hell of a lot more money mutilating you improperly and then drugging you for the rest of your life,

>>10516880
>despite making up only 1.2-6.8 percent of the population...

It's so funny how such low portions of the population end up squealing the most.

>>10516916
>social
>you

doesn't matter what you think, what matters is what's popular.

>>10515001
Neither. It's a coaxial pulse perturbation.

>>10516234
fields are not particles.

>>10512898
The gender social construct is just another form of the "poor rich" paradigm that humans have NEVER ended. It's a product of pure materialism so as long as such humans exist then the cycle will continue. Retards will always believe they were "deprived" of something they never had, obviously because they want "more". It's only a question of "wants" rather than "needs".

>>10512902
Who do you think is getting the majority of transition surgeries?

>>10512917
>it won't, gender IS a social construct, now if you're talking about how people are being absolutely retarded about it then hopefully soon.
This is a redundant statement. The recognition of "genders" is inherently retarded from the standpoint that we're all human beings. Humans only have the illusion of a duality that we've dubbed "male" and "female" but it's not an actual duality of "human". Basically as long as we keep referring to ourselves as a "particularized" human based on such illogical reasons then that's what we'll be.

>>10512941
And both are "human".

>>10513770
>Retard who believes you can make something that has no basis in reality "obsolete"

>>10514096
>groupthink that agrees with me
Nice

>Prove it.
Prove that a human needs to change sex in order to be self-sufficient. If it takes away the self-sufficiency of the human then I would wager to say that it's pretty "degenerate" to the human.

>By definition, they do. An outlier existing at all disproves your claim that “you’re either male or female when you’re born.” Making bare assertions is really sad. :-)
All this proves is that gender/sex doesn't matter. So why would you overcomplicate/destroy what is not flawed? If you're a "human" that's what you are. Focusing on the duality drives you further from that.

>>10514105
Yes
>Can someone explain this retarded shit to me?
Materialism. "I want", "I don't have", "I was deprived of something I was absent of" type of "thinking". Jealousy too.

>>10508861
Do inches have "dimension"? Obviously not, how can a measurement have tangibility? It's like saying "an inch exists". Yeah, an inch of what?

>>10508879
>How are u gonna explain black holes if time is bs?
Good question. What is the current explanation of a "Black hole"? If it has no proper explanation as of yet then the game is still on.

>>10508882
Partially correct, only because space also doesn't exist and has no properties.

>>10508892
Good post

>>10509315
>>10510306
>You're too dumb to believe in something that doesn't exist
Clown world

>>10509353
He also said things with no properties can be "bent".

>>10509462
>a battery powered device runs on time
If I destroy your clock does time stop?

>>10511368
>>10511538
>I think, therefore I am a circular logic retard who thinks he can define himself
No
>>10511446
>I think therefore I can reify the existence of an omnipotent being unlike myself.
Even more "no".

>>10506590
Empirically it's a conjugate, but the form still dictates "matter". Carbon can become a plethora of phenomena, but without form it's absolutely nothing. It can't even have the "form" of carbon since carbon is just a formation of "protons and neutrons". It doesn't just form itself, the matter is impelled by something.

>>10506390
An illusion of qualia, but the qualities are there nonetheless. It's not "nothing" that's for sure.

>>10506397
How much does it exist then? What quality of existence is it?

>>10506417
Matter is formed, not the otherway around

>>10506506
>>10506545

>I think therefore I define myself
Circular reasoning

>>10503075
It's certainly not against them, but you still have no argument.

>>10502266
>Shameless attention whoring is discouraged in the /sci/entific community.

Well maybe if /sci/ was so smart they could read the fucking rules once in awhile. The name stays as does your no arguments.

>>10502221
Only namefagging cause a bunch of crybabies couldn't handle anime pictures on a Taiwanese basket weaving forum and reported me to the thought jannies.

Oh and nice picture and no argument, you tumor.

>>10502193
No
>why
No composition, identity or characteristic that make it "dimensional".

>>10501990
>>10501990
I am not Brian Kerr.

>Makes me wonder how many /sci/entists join forces outside of /sci/, are there any groups you know of?

Nearly every person on /sci/ hates me and I don't expect any of them would be part of a group that would have them as a member. This is /x/ lite and you're not going to get a proper explanation from the majority here.

>>10501745
>i want some gifs of simulation or real observation, but the internet is filled with pop-sci apocalyptic cancer trash

that really should tell you all you need to know about blackholes. Morons working with nonexistent source material.

>>10501878

Here's a non-simulation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-C-3bYBJmc

>>10500665
>The obvious implication here being that an actual Platonist could define existence.
t.-still doesn't get the joke, that being that a Platonist would never do such a dumb thing.

>"b-b-b--b-bbut i never literally said that in those exact literal words, literally, forms"
Literally didn't say that either, but you're getting warmer. Do you even know what is meant by "forms"?

>Fuck off, retard.
Maybe you should try framing your posts in the form of a question instead of an insufferable cunt.

>>10500668
>I have read all of these, and it is absolutely not clear what a real Platonist would think.
Unfortunately it's at the disposal of modern day translators, try the Thomas Taylor version. Reread at least Parmenides especially when they talk of what "The One is" (or isn't!) and you will understand why it is impossible to define.

>>10499912
>nothing has a composition
fallacy of reification.

>>10499926
>implying this is an answer
Come on numbnuts, give me something to work with.

>>10499899
You, unironically didn't give me an answer. Come on smart guy, tell me how reality works. Don't tell me that a mental defective such as myself has stumped you.