/sci/ - Science & Math

Bump.

Anyone else got anything interesting to add?

The smallest weird number is 70. Its proper divisors are 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 35; these sum to 74, but no subset of these sums to 70. The number 12, for example, is abundant but not weird, because the proper divisors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, which sum to 16; but 2 + 4 + 6 = 12.

The first few weird numbers are

70, 836, 4030, 5830, 7192, 7912, 9272, 10430, 10570, 10792, 10990, 11410, 11690, 12110, 12530, 12670, 13370, 13510, 13790, 13930, 14770, .

>>11396199
Yeah, and the 4th prime as well

>>11396200
Missing no.

>>11395930
Hahaha, definition of imbecile

How do you end up replying to another thread, you human sized blood clot

>>11395529
Hahaha, I like this comment

>>11394711
So what you're saying is, that you don't see the overwhelming amount of coincidences, formulas and properties of 7? Everything mentioned in this thread has made so many clear distinctions as to why '7' is so under studied.

All you did was use 11 as an example to discredit 7, and doing so has caused you to not only disrespect 7 but the number 11 as well in the process. You used it as a gimmick to try and downplay the significance of 7.

You're an idiot, who has a biased attachment because peers in your 'math group' either achieve more then you, or more popular then you etc. I don't know and I don't care. My point is, you can't remove yourself from even a basic conversation about mathematics, without it covertly leading back to your personal beliefs or internal struggles and for some reason applying it to some obscure fucking anime no one's heard off, brings me to the belief you're a fedora wearing asshat who suffers from Dunning Kruger.

Now while I expressed similar sentiments in regards to my own personal beliefs, I didn't use them as a trajectory to confirm my beliefs or discredit yours.

Do you see the difference?

I feel bad, maybe you're just a kid after all, going through changes in life and your hormones make you thick headed as shit.

Please learn to engage in civil discussion.
Check mate, asshole

>>11395078
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.

>>11394711
11 Is cool, but it's no 7

>>11394765
Ma Seven

>>11394273
If that wasn't enough, here's some more

111 × 111 = 12321
0111 = Binary for 7

3 x 4 = 12
1 + 2 = 3
3 / 3 = 1

7 is the only base 10 digit, that cannot be multiplied or divided into it's original base group

1 divided by 7 gives 0.1428571428571429
2 divided by 7 gives 0.2857142857142857
3 divided by 7 gives 0.4285714285714286

The pattern of 142857 in all the divisions.

>>11394273
>Pythagoras concluded that math could not, nor could ever explain reality.

You're really going to twist shit like that?

"Mathematics not only cleared the mind but allowed for an objective comprehension of reality"

Obviously you can't explain EVERYTYHING otherwise we'd be a type 3 civilization at this point, so that was a stupid, try again.

>Cool story bro. Now say something of use.
Are you blind? Have you noticed the re-occuring theme of that sequence or are you just trying to throw it off as if it has no significance to what the thread was about, if so - you obviously don't care about the pursuit of knowledge, just the pursuit to be right even when you're wrong.
Pride comes hard before the fall, dweeb.

>...and now we're just namedropping?

So because of this comment, it's obvious you don't understand the cyclic sequence that was mentioned previously NOR do you know the reason for its resurfacing and how it was applied to Nicholas Tesla's behavior, inventions & understandings.

>yeah by actually experimenting instead of playing number games

Nice assumption, what's it like having no friends, and being a fat fucking loser who plays video games all day?
While that may not be true, but if we're playing the assumption game - I can easily do the same shit you cunt, but I digress.

>Zero is not a number

Yeah, obviously numb nuts but you wouldn't have the entry point for the Fibonacci Sequence without it

(0,1) instead of (1,1) is that it makes the divisibility property of the Fibonacci sequence more straightforward to state; i.e., that Fk divides Fnk for any k,n. If you start with F0=1 instead of F0=0 then this breaks down (for instance, in that numbering F2=2 but F4=5) and a lot of results have to be presented with indices shifted. (Rough Representation) of Fn as 15√(ϕn−φn) (with φ=1ϕ=ϕ−1)

Your move, Gatekeeper

>>11394273
Firstly, thank you for providing actual input with an argument.

>Numerology isn't math, it's metaphysics. So not /x/ but >>>/his/. Thanks, have a nice day.

I'll retract my statement of saying "everything" posted here coincides, I was wrong - however the original concept I brought across was the properties of 7. Yes I added secondary thoughts about the numerology side of things, but that's not the information I was looking to discuss, that's what you chose to pick out from my posts and use against me while disregarding everything else I brought forward in regards to the actual properties of 7, which I guess I'll repeat since you're such a smarty pants

Factors of 7 (1 & 7)

4th Prime (7)

17th Prime (17)

2nd Mersenne Prime (7)

There are 47 Mersenne Prime Numbers

47 is the 15th Prime (Re occuring 1, 5)

Re occuring no. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10)
(Updated from last post)

Which can be found as integer notations in the seven scales of musical scale (0, 4, 7, 10)

The seventh chord to be played in a Fibonacci Sequence in music is 3/8
Which comes out as 162hz (Phi)
The octave on the same note is 81

It takes 27 days, 7 hours, and 43 minutes for our Moon to complete one full orbit around Earth

The 47-year cycle of Mars: after 47 years -
22 synodic periods of 780 days each -
Mars returns to the same position among the stars and is in the same relationship to the Earth and Sun.

>materialism over specific quantifications that have no inherent meaning

Not once did I use the argument of "numerology" or "religion" as a factor to prove a point, I just added it to the thread because it was interesting.

In fact I didn't come here to prove a point, I cam here to ask for what EVERYONE thought, I didn't bring a conclusion or an argument, so you're just squabbling with yourself here. I'm aware of what I don't know and that's what I came to ask, instead you decided to use both yours & my own time to pick and choose what you didnt like. PART 1/2

>>11394203
Sorry if im making assumptions, I'm not great at Geometry

>>11393957
Holy shit, if Pi is just the circumference coupled with the diameter in other words a regular circle, and Pythagoras along with every other Greek Philospher at the time were the first ones to propose the Earth is Spherical using 2*pi

Is this what birthed the the notion of a spherical planet at the time?

Does that correlate to his
"Seven Races in the One Round" idea?
The actual remainder or 'rest' with the 7th day of rest in the Abrahamic religions, perhaps others too.

Thanks for your input.

>>11393963
Here you go.
A concept I'm still grasping myself

>>11392893
That's a paradox and falsification isn't it?
Interesting and uninteresting are both subjective aren't they?
So it's a contradiction

>>11392904
Nice response brainlet.
Go be a troglodyte somewhere else until you come up with some kind of counter argument.

You haven't mentioned or highlighted what exactly I said that's considered "x" related.

>>11392525
>>11392552
I am the OP and I made most of the references to the alot of the shit that you consider "x" related.

I get your premise, but if you're so smart you can learn to entertain a thought without believing it. Everything posted here coincides with mathematics.

I completely understand your view on how shit like this can get twisted and used as a bias towards some woo woo metaphysical shit, and because of the prevalence in so many of these new age movements it's strikes a chord with you.

Obviously these types of people will try to fit these properties into their belief structure to try and prove their retarded shit - but everything posted here is consistent with the 4 laws of mathematics, DeMorgans law and basic simplification.

Give me one example in this whole thread that wasn't concise besides the people relating it to the number 7 in an anecdotal form.

And while I have to explain things to you like a kid, maybe take a look at the views on Mathematics by Archimedes and Pythagoras themselves.

Go ahead and give me one example, bevause everything posted that is even slightly bordering the "schizo" shit is fundamental history and qouted prominently in number theory, algebra, trigonometry.

Don't be the equivalent of the self righteous Athiest dude, it's just as parasitic as the self righteous Baptist Church freak.

I'll wait.

Also the number 142,857 and it's geometrical form is literally a well known sequence and cyclic figure.

Please, give me one thing I mentioned in that previous post that is considered "x" related. In the same damn post I even mentioned how the new age how subscribed to it and I discredited it.

Nicholas Tesla might've been a bit eccentric but he contributed more then you did and or will.

>>11392297
Have a nice day bro, hope shit isn't to stressful for you.

>>11392410
Hey bro, here you go
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/142,857

It's the properties of the shape called an Enneagram

"The enneagram is a nine-pointed figure usually inscribed within a circle. Within the circle is a triangle connecting points 9, 3 and 6. The inscribed figure resembling a web connects the other six points in a cyclic figure 1-4-2-8-5-7. This number is derived from or corresponds to the recurring decimal .142857 = 1/7. These six points together with the point numbered 9 are said to represent the main stages of any complete process, and can be related to the notes of a musical octave, 9 being equivalent to "Doh" and 1 to "Re" etc. The points numbered 3 and 6 are said to represent "shock points" which affect the way a process develops. The internal lines between the points; that is, the three-point figure and the six-point figure, are said to show certain non-obvious connections, although here very little elucidation is offered. "

It's connecting points are 3, 6 and 9.
Also the same numbers that Tesla was obsessed with, especially in its regards to frequencies & vibrations.

It's been heavily adopted by psuedo's in the new age movement which makes it hard to shed light on, but I gotta tell ya it's a bottomless pit when you start trying to figure it out out.

Pic related is the geometric property of that particular cyclic sequence.

>>11392067
I'm not a mathematician
But I will figure it out or die trying

I'm glad you're also on the same wave length

>>11392088
God rested on the 7th

>>11391796
I agree with you, that's why I'm not compiling evidence or equations that I have made.

Everything you see posted only 1 piece of information if mine.

Please explain this image

It takes 27 days, 7 hours, and 43 minutes for our Moon to complete one full orbit around Earth.

3 raised to the power of 4 is written 34 = 81.
-4 raised to the power of 2 is written (-4)2 = 16.
-3 raised to the power of 3 is written (-3)3 = -27.
Note that in this case the answer is the same for both -33 and (-3)3 however they are still calculated differently. -33 = -1 * 3 * 3 * 3 = (-3)3 = -3 * -3 * -3 = -27.

The 47-year cycle of Mars: after 47 years -
22 synodic periods of 780 days each -
Mars returns to the same position among the stars and is in the same relationship to the Earth and Sun. The ancient Mesopotamians discovered this cycle.

I'm going to write a memoir regarding once I figure some of this out..

There has to be another sequence that's either not discovered or abandoned as our civilization has progressed.

Anyone else got some insight?

>>11391732
I've seen it and as a Jew I'm well aware of the dangers, I don't study Kabbalah because of it, thanks for your advice though.. it's a great movie

>>11391636
And that's binary right, can you tell me any other examples of 7 through binary that seem to coincide?
Thanks again