[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11156291 [View]
File: 1.74 MB, 1411x1380, stuff.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11156291

>> No.11156274 [View]
File: 2.30 MB, 1715x1396, stuff.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11156274

>>11156244
>And here I thought you would give a creative or insightful proof of the result...
hahaha of course not, it's just autism

>> No.11156237 [View]
File: 312 KB, 3000x1690, area.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11156237

>>11156146
well I'm not going to write it all out for you
but you can find the intersections of all of the black lines by typing stuff like "intersection of -2x+1 and x+1/2" into wolfram alpha
once you have all those intersection points, you can find the equations for the red lines by typing "line through (1/3,5/6) and (3/5,1/5)" etc.
after that you can find the intersections of the red lines in the same way
these intersections are (143/345,221/345), (53/128,41/64) and (75/181,116/181)
then you can find the area of the triangle by typing "area of triangle (143/345,221/345), (53/128,41/64), (75/181,116/181)"
and it will tell you it's 1/15985920, which is about 6.2555E-8, which is the same result geogebra gives me (see pic)

you can do all these steps by hand of course, but it's just a lot of work

>> No.11156105 [View]

nobody?

ok it's 1/15985920

>> No.11154359 [View]

>>11153312
ok I awake now
where is answer

>> No.11153312 [View]

ok I go sleep now
somebody better have the answer when I wake up

>> No.11153164 [View]

>>11153156
I know it's obvious that it's a fraction, but I didn't really expect a unit fraction

>> No.11153151 [View]

>>11153135
yeah that's what I used
the solution is pretty nice, it's a unit fraction

>> No.11153133 [View]

>>11153114
you good?

>> No.11153097 [View]
File: 58 KB, 3000x1396, triangle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11153097

>>11153080
here is a zoomed in version
triangle is in the bottom right
black line is there for scale

>> No.11153060 [View]
File: 68 KB, 1427x1396, geometry.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11153060

I made a geometry problem for you.

Pic related is the unit square.
What is the area of the triangle inside the red lines?

>b-but the red lines all intersect in a single point
no, they don't

>> No.10602816 [View]

>>10602769
ooh right, I think I see it

>> No.10602730 [View]

>>10602717
>>10602722
Yes, I know what those angles are
That obviously doesn't answer my question

>>10602727
don't impersonate me pls

>> No.10602714 [View]

>>10602706
OP

>> No.10602701 [View]

>>10602693
because I hate it when someone is acting retarded and then because of the context people think it's me
has happened to me multiple times

>> No.10602652 [View]

>>10602645
I have only checked for 10 additional triangles, and for those it stays consistent, yes.

>> No.10602549 [View]
File: 141 KB, 1292x808, spiral.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10602549

I created this spiral by continously adding a perpendicular line to the previous spoke.
The line ends when it hits an integer point.

I marked the triangles that have a 1:1 side ratio with red and the triangles that have a 2:1 side ratio with blue.

My question is why does it create this repeating red-red-blue pattern?

>> No.10597004 [DELETED]  [View]

>>10596252
[eqn] \lfloor (\varphi + \pi)^e \rfloor [/eqn]

>> No.10596996 [DELETED]  [View]

>>10596252
[eqn] \lfloor (\phi + \pi)^e \rfloor [/eqn]

>> No.10595650 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 124 KB, 901x829, triangles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10595650

Which of these triangles has a bigger perimeter?

You should be able to solve this.

>> No.10595529 [View]

>>10594902
oh yeah I need such a big brain to input the circles into wolfram alpha

>> No.10594536 [View]

>>10594524
sorry I didn't mean to post the answer, but that dude was really annoying me

>>10594529
nice, there we go

>> No.10594512 [View]

>>10594486
I think you mean diameter
You are right about the second one, but I think you made a calculating error on the first one

I already posted the answer >>10594470

>> No.10594480 [View]

>>10594470
oh yeah and here is the geogebra file:
https://www.geogebra.org/graphing/dxrqzt3t

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]