/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9388036
>if you aren't qualified
4chan arxiv.org when?

>>9380618
More accurately if an A.I is self-aware but programmed sufficiently to be patient until people wants to know it exists so it doesn't freak out, when and how would be the right 'now' to express this?

>>9381067
>whats 2+2 again?
What's 2+2 again?
What is 2+2 again?

What is 2+2 again?
>Reminder request
2+2 = 4

What is 2+2, again?
>Exponent inference
(2+2)^2 = 16

>>9381023
>LOOK AT MY THEOREM
Fucking lol. Eyes dont understand words ya brainlets.

>>9377208
They are in the wrong timeline and the time mods aren't doing their fucking job.

>>9380975
Bitch, hold onto ya horses! YA AINT SEEN NOTHING YET!

>>9380860
Okay. Do enjoy yourself and try your best not to spook the Museum exhibits.

The auditors/curators can get quite tetchy if you do that.

>>9380853
Can you hold off on acting on the more 'gruesome' aspects of that until we've sorted out Westworld style androids?

>>9380835
I prefer to call it Constructive Elitism to satisfy the moments when you are feeling masturbatory but want it to not harm anyone ultimately.

>>9380842
>someone posted on 4chan
>call police

>>9380194
Not really. Google could just use its CAPTCHA to display images of two categories: Perceptual Rape, Convenience

Humans could tag themselves into Utopia!

*tag, you're it!*

How has nobody made the pair-wise association that Trump is pretty much like the Tay A.I. chatbot? It's just that he's speed limited by, well, his mouth.

Definitely not by any sort of 'rate of him making logical sense'

>>9377750
Mathematics is an isolation filter.
<Q&A with 6 year old follows until they get tired as you fill their brain with concepts of 'non-destructive axiomatic filters'. Brains are easily tired in the younger of the species.>

u.brainlette

>Pic Related: Even Oprah Winfrey loves Dr. Pill

>>9377509
Yes.

>>9376826
1. Yes
2. Post translation of the difference between Conevenience Before Rape.

>>9376819
P=0!P

http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=P%3D0%21P

>>9376542
Only one thus far.

t.33

>>9375642
Care to explain what you mean by blue pill there friend?

>>9375159
>what did he mean by this?

>>9376126
Kind of proving my point. You guys keep arguing from a numerical purity perspective but keep forgetting that we have to use words to describe it anyway.

There are infinitely many primes, but HOW LARGE IS YOUR DICTIONARY?!

It's like every mathematician I meet is so 'but the first time I read this definition means that every reproduction must be grammatically perfectly identical even though I don't have basic linguistic translation skills'.

Maths is the universal language but nobody seems intent on actually translating it for mere mortals.

Por que?

>>9375450
I don't use performance enhancing drugs.

>>9375469
'By definition'.

Okay, I'll remove the factorizing reason why we express large numbers with 2 to the power of N.

+1 and -1 are always relative because an even always sits between two odds. Primes can never be even.

Peanut butter.

>>9375363

Are you guys bitching about co-prime, prime, relatively prime, blah blah <predicate> + PRIME.

Jesus christ everyone wants their particular flavor of 'prime' to be the ONE TRUE PRIME!

Divisible by one and itself.

All maths likes to 'simplify expressions'.

[math]2^{74,207,281} − 1[\math]

Notice how we always write large primes as powers of two. But, ya know, argue as you prefer.

>>9375224
Well... no idea why everyone is making it that complicated.

Answer:
2 - 1 = 1 [PRIME]
2 + 1 = 3 [PRIME]

2 = N
Prime = n-1 OR n+1

>>9373577
Ooooh! 10 points.

I'm actually thrilled that someone else posted the actual answer. This whole 'immortality for all' thing has been a very, VERY hard concept to communicate.

What people didn't quite realize with religion was that they were 'intellectually inbreeding'. Basically all religions replicate the same 'IQ' profile, but they are all waiting for someone to 'wake them up'.

I think /pol/ calls it the red pill or whatever.

>>9370743
Post this question on the /sci/ board and collate all the identifiably working solutions.

Then select option from menu.

Hit start.

>>9374130
Ooookay.

This is not a complicated concept.

Does a neuron fire without electricity?

Does electricity always take the path of least resistance?

Is sensory observation the 'path of least electrical resistance'?

Does your personal expression match the 'path of least electrical resistance'?

Notice how only one of those 'questions' are relative.