/sci/ - Science & Math

ignore

>>6479291
>>6479294
Fair enough.

>>6479275
Thanks. What about the brain? Not all of it is vital, right?

>>6479270
Mm, let's say, at least 24 hours.

Hi, /sci/.

So, me and a friend were thinking about this question - how much of yourself could you consume before dying? Or more generally, how much damage could your body sustain before you die?

Assume you have someone to help you cut, proper instruments, your wounds get treatment (eg. you can't bleed out from removing your leg).

At what point would the damage get so bad you die? Remember, you can't bleed out. Imagine all the wounds heal instantly, or whatever. What is the absolute minimum for survival?

>>6461009
>>6461003
>>6460997
I was just wondering if you could. I thought about using ethanol and the ethanoic acid to make ethyl ethanoate for kicks

How could you distill vinegar to yield high-quality, high concentration ethanoic acid?

>>6441644
Nice dubs, but I think I can read, thanks very much
Read my other post

>>6441640
Right, there are, but it seemed like you meant "there could be some clever guys who could figure out strategies" rather than "there 100% are". Eh, my bad.
There are guidelines to this game...?

>>6441639
Nice. Mine is similar, though I'll give yours a try.

All I do is never press left at all - If you move them all from side-to-side, it creates small numbers in areas where you can't get rid of them if you mostly have high numbers, which basically boxes you in.

I guess the trick is to keep most of your numbers in one place, judging by our tactics

>>6441631
>unless you're smart enough to figure out strategies by yourself
>unless

Ever heard of the conditional, faggot?

>>6441627
No point, I just thought you were wondering if there is one.
Also, what's yours?

>>6441621
There is a strategy to it.

Thanks for this, OP

What?

How exactly would methylphenidate cause loss of appetite or alopecia?
What parts of a stimulant's effect on your body would cause these effects?

>>6426712
>>6426714
>>6426697
Will have a look, thanks for opinions everyone

>>6426671
Ah, right. Yeah, >>6426646 was a little suspect, but I try not to question the good people of /sci/. Still, it might be enjoyable, right?

>>6426661
>Good for, Ed.

Eh?

>>6426646
Nothing physics-related, but I just find higher-tier physics really interesting, so my family figured I'd like this book. Pretty stoked for it, not going to lie

>>6426636
Thx m8

captcha: doubting alitht

Is this an interesting book? Got it as a present a while back, and have been meaning to crack it open.

Also, what level of detail is it? Babby's first theoretical physics or pretty high level?

>>6414981
That's a good series, I've been flicking through the physics and genetics ones