[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.4231655 [View]

>last month's

Don't they tell you the solution once the competition is over?

>> No.4179085 [View]

>>4179080
be above it when its nasty and dont be above it when its awesome. (in other words, who gives a fuck if something is part of our nature or not?)

>> No.3980061 [View]
File: 14 KB, 240x240, 9.40.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3980061

u guise

>> No.3977880 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 173 KB, 631x466, friar.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3977880

mfw i check this thread this morning

>> No.3975703 [View]

>>3975698
Had a good time. Didn't let it affect a pleasant occasion.

>> No.3975695 [View]

>>3975680
Nah, would have been antisocial. I'm not aspergal.

>> No.3975669 [View]
File: 91 KB, 736x736, 1238460527697.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3975669

>At wine tasting evening
>Host offers questions during the evening, person who answers the most correctly wins free novelty chocolate wine
>Question: what are the products of the fermentation of yeast?
>Most answers are found quickly, one left
>I suggest "energy"
>Host shakes his head
>People laugh
>Guy next to me says "heat"
>Correct answer, applause

>> No.3807409 [View]

>>3807360
Large breasts do not produce more milk. Instead, it is thought that large breasts are more attractive because they sag a lot more with age and therefore the male mind can (subconsciously) determine age from them, better than from small ones. This is important since younger women are a lot more fertile.

In other words, men who are attracted to large breasts (until they begin to sag) will be more reproductive successful than men who are attracted to small breasts (always).

>> No.3796221 [View]

>>3796214
I know, it's a joke bro

>> No.3796172 [View]
File: 27 KB, 600x544, 573swz17o-t[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3796172

Always knew it was a simulation.
<

>> No.3647570 [View]

>>3647513
>>3647527
http://caffeineweb.com/

>> No.3501490 [View]

>>3501391
>>3501438
Another angry poem about school by Taylor Mali
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qXgPfMGG8E

>> No.3500591 [View]

It's an american thing.

>> No.3495513 [View]

>I am now a 22 year old who mainly relays on a calculator.

As you should be. Calculators are useful. Maths pros aren't just people who do basic sums. Learn about the actual concepts.

>> No.3484296 [View]

>>3484276
Al Jazzera is a pretty good news source...

I like it when BBC isn't an option.

>> No.3484072 [View]

>>3484059
You can get fucked in the ass every day this year with no real risk. It's mainly something that happens to old people after straining too hard on the toilet.

>> No.3470615 [View]

>>3470533
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

>> No.3411964 [View]

https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/

>> No.3390475 [View]

>>3389585
>online university
>decent
>pick one

Generally the "pick one" shouldn't be green when this format is used. i.e.:

>online university
>decent
pick one

>> No.3390205 [View]

>>3390140
>speaking american

>>3390159
>>3390169
You morons, he just used "I can't do maths for shit" as shorthand to describe the trend of performing much worse in the highly mathematical areas. It doesn't mean he actually can't do maths.

For example, in my first year of physics there was maths in every module, but there were also dedicated maths modules which had much harder maths to prepare you for the next years. It is perfectly reasonable for a physicist to do really well in all the other modules but struggle with the harder maths stuff and ask for online assistance to get it.

>> No.3384288 [View]
File: 831 KB, 225x183, 1305897910214.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3384288

>>3384284
>spirit science

>> No.3375012 [View]
File: 4 KB, 259x194, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3375012

>It is easier to build a house than it is to create life.

This is the crux of the argument. It rests on the reader accepting this premise, and it tries to trick the reader into doing so by using a vague word "easier", and not defining the conditions well. Here would be a better-formed premise which would allow the rest of the argument to continue as normal:

>It is more likely that a house would emerge from natural processes over millions of years than that life would emerge from natural processes over millions of years.

We now see that the argument uses circular reasoning because step 3 says:
>Therefore the probability of life creating itself out of nothing is less than that.
But this is an assumption of the initial argument. So what you "proved" is really a hidden premise.

I could explain how step 4 does not follow step 3 but it's no necessary.

>> No.3368528 [View]

>>3368497
Also lol
>questions like "am i gay?" except it would be "am i actually hetero?"
>actually
>heteronormativity

>> No.3368511 [View]

>>3368497
No because gays have generally had a bit more time to think about sexuality so won't ask such retarded questions.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]