/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1982064

One more thing I'd like to point out is that under a society modeled after TVP, corrupt people will have no opportunity for corrupting the system. How would YOU corrupt such a system if you were living in an environment? Which political office would you run for? Which corporation would you try to run? Which army would you try to take control of? All of these questions are in fact moot (lol). And then, we must consider why a person would want to destroy society in the first place.

In this system, the tyranny of the few could never topple the good of the many.

QED

>>1982058

How on Earth did you manage to come up with that rebuttal?

Whether or not you believe TVP has a chance of working is irrelevant, as far as I'm concerned. The important thing is that you learn to check your assumptions. Primarily, the ones which tell you that the status quo is good, the government is on your side, and that politicians/lawyers/businessmen aren't completely retarded pricks who haven't a clue how science works.

Good night /sci/, I'll leave you with that.

>>1982043

>implying The Venus Project is a "utopian" society
>implying you understand basic psychology/humanity
>implying economics is at all relevant within the context of such a society

I completely agree with you OP.

Thanks for posting this thread btw.

I'd love to help; but could you give me a brief synopsis of the theory of Kuhn? Please excuse my ignorance.

OP is 12 years old.

Conservation of energy holds true. Now humiliate me, if you can.

The moon is at a certain angle with respect to the Earth's equator. Therefore, for some people in the world, the moon can stay visible for a period longer than 24 yrs. The fact that the moon disappears and the earth rotates are two events which aren't mutually inclusive.

lrn 2 astronomy /sci/

>>1975795

If he wasn't, then he's the biggest faggot to ever exist. If he was, then you are.

If we consider this a scenario modeled after shrodinger's cat, then until we know for certain whether or no he's a troll, you're both raging faggots.

QED bitch

>>1975271

hahaha

brofist.jpg

How do you kill Kira?

Dear anon,

Thanks for not majoring in law. We have enough of those faggots fucking us all over already.

Signed,

Humanity

>>1960847

ugh, idiot. No one is saying that math isn't an exact process. My argument was that its elegance comes from the paradox by which complexity becomes simplistic.

I was trying to help you appreciate some of my findings regarding natural law and mathematics.

The fact that you hide behind your degrees tells me you're hiding behind personal experience and viewing the world around you through a biased and subjective lense. Learn to decode and question your assumptions.

I'm out of here.

>>1960836

that's sort of what I was getting at.

>>1960828

You're making assumptions. I was only pointing out that you had misused the word.

Math is obviously an exact process. My argument is that the underlying processes are elegant.

Forget it, though. Some minds just don't have the capability of accepting such concepts.

Also you don't need to samefag in order to make your points clear.

>>1960799
>>1960799

The true beauty of mathematics comes from its simplicity and elegance. The exactness you describe is merely an illusion.

All problems have an elegant solution; all solutions have an elegant expression.

>>1960778

Whatever; you're just nitpicking. The same ratio can be expressed in some terms of opp/hyp.
since cosine and sine are complementary.

Learn to see the big picture; you'll see more that way.

Every angle in a triangle is proportional to the ratios between the opposite side of a triangle and some other side.

These different ratios interact, simplify, and integrate with each other in various different, complex, yet simple ways.

Thus is the nature, of nature.
>your face when
/thread

The scientific method in its own right is merely a tool which humans use to deduce the natural laws of nature. The application of the scientific method usually results from a certain level of curiosity or insatiable romanticism shared by scientists.

The tool and the purpose for using it are two different things. Once you understand the semantics behind your argument it becomes easier to discuss.

We like finding solutions to problems, and science kicks ass.

If you can't solve the puzzle, then you're a loser.

etc, etc

So what's your point?

>faggot in the video has a lisp
>stopped watching there

OP even though you're trolling, I'd like to point out that transitional fossils do exist. You can walk into any good museum in the world and look at different fossils ranging from Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Same thing for countless other organisms.

Evolution is a natural law of nature, similar to entropy. If you don't believe in evolution after considering all the available information, then you're simply an idiot.

/thread

>>1891217

troll detected

>>1891215

I never said quantum physics was actual proof, I just alluded to it because it contains this entire debate.

lrn 2 quantum physics /sci/

>>1891189

Cool story bro

>>1891140

If what you're saying is true, then all it means is that Harvard admissions is as screwed up as I think it is.