/sci/ - Science & Math

it's like i'm really on /new/

>>3909386
good lord, can you do anything except appeal to emotions, nigger?
i can start spamming some ron paul doomsday stuff; it has essentially the same content as that post

>>3909357
>implying i actually advocate that
hell no. i was just taking that poster's logic to it's furthest conclusion

>>3909341
so now banks are immune from their bad business decisions?

>>3909306
the funny thing is, most of those links actually don't support the bailouts
but no matter

>>3909303
no u

>>3909299
so, by that logic, why "bailout" the banks if they were the root cause of the crisis? why not bail out the effected industries after letting the banks go underwater?

>>3909279
wow, you should've really actually read those before posting them

but no matter, i'm finally heading out, thank god. was waiting on a text, finally got it

>>3909243
>Giant banks fail == global depression
PROVE IT YOU GOD DAMN NIGGERJEWFAGGOT BANKER ENABLER

>>3909224
indeed, the issue of taxation comes to mind

but i think we can agree that most people in this thread are pretty economically ignorant

>>3909213
i would go further insofar as to say no economic model is completely correct 100% of the time, simply because of the nature of the field

>>3909201
>durr they dumb

well, you could look at that link provided, which has claimed the depression was caused by the fed's expansion of the money supply, look at it's reasoning, and refute it
but i guess that's expecting a little much of /sci/

>>3909179
ok, fair enough. he replied to my post, and i assumed it was you, mr. anonymous

>>3909181
see
>>3909176


>>3909186
oh lawdy, the trolling i could do here

>>3909169
>i refuse to read the link provider and consider any evidence because it has the word "austrian" in it, and that makes me upset because i think austrians are stupid and evil

stay classy

why do people create religion threads in /sci/?
tell me your opinion

>>3909154
you asked for a citation. the austrian business cycle explains both the depression and our current recession

>>3909129
quantify it, you nigger

>>3909122
this should detail that view nicely, along with several other things
http://mises.org/rothbard/agd.pdf

>>3909061
look at the time frames, you idiot. the monetarist criticism is aimed towards the fed's inaction during the crises as the artificially inflated money supply was rapidly deflating, versus the fed, you know, actually creating said bubble previously during the 20's
god damn you are dense

>>3909020
>Congress seemed to think so. Economists around the world seemed to think so
oh really? can you explain why, please?

>>3909012
yes, that's how the bailouts worked, right?

>>3909019
you do realize the great depression was the direct result of the bubble created in the 20's by the expansion of the money supply, which created a boom driven primarily by credit (much like the housing boom)? and this was the work of the federal reserve?
after such a crash, the affected financial institutions should be liquidized, not bailed out

>>3909005
think you can take it from here? i wasn't really planning on hanging around

>>3909001
too later, kneegrow

>>3908996
>Either we bail them out or we let the economy fail
the problem here is you believe these are the only two possible outcomes

>>3908898
>classical liberalism == modern liberalism

>>3908983
god damn, wrong pic

>>3908969
>too big to fail lololol
and you people claim you oppose the banks

>>3908960
i'm most likely leaving soon, so no time to have a lengthy discussion
but since you asked, have some audit

>>3908963
no, liberty is an idiot. i'm just a friend passing through

>>3908920
>doesn't know the fed controls the federal funds rate nor the implications thereof

what, do you think i'm just on some rant about the federal reserve or whatever because big gubment is scary?
open your eyes, man