/sci/ - Science & Math

quattrobump

I think I'm going to leave this unless someone else posts, and try again tommorow

tresbump
even if you only do one, you're helping.
and, if you can't be bothered look at http://www.falstad.com/gravity.html, one of the reasons I'm attempting this.

doublebump

bump

>>1245613
>>1245597
and I agree completely. However, as this is intended to just be interesting (as opposed to completely accurate) I still believe the results will be fit for purpose.

Links:

current results are in a table at "http://goo.gl/m1Qg"..

The full questions (and solutions) are available at "http://goo.gl/GfGb".. Using these is quicker if you don't have time to personally respond to questions, but it's easier to just copy the questions on the form and manually type responses if you don't have a dual monitor setup

the actual survey page (ie, data input) is at "http://goo.gl/wFnA".. If any of the questions aren't answered input the ones that are, and we can adjust for this later.

thanks again!

Hello again

A few weeks ago I posted here suggesting we survey the internet to find out what the public knew scientifically speaking. We decided on questions, made a form/spreadsheet for data input, and generated about 20 responses. Then we all sort-of forgot about it, and didn't do anything.

In the interests of SCIENCE I'm asking you to help me survey as many people as you can, the aims being to 1) gauge public understanding of science, and 2) educate the public on matters they don't understand (especially in cases where they want to know). The details we are logging are age,gender,sexuality,nationality and formal qualifications in science related subjects.

If you have any queries/criticisms post them in this thread and I'll try to answer as accurately as possible.

>>1176574
in that case, you are welcome. Enjoy your stay and if you feel like any more awesome try out http://www.cosmolearning.com/documentaries/cosmos/

>>1153882
it has 4 including one part that do not ever post, 200%. However, when observed the superpositionary quality of /sci/'s posters is anhilated and they all either agree or disagree with him

>>1155571
Get out now, and if you look back we will turn you into a god damn pillar of salt.

All I can think is "wow, this game is REALLY boring"
why would you play me? why would you even make an NPC of me?

>>1154945
>>1154925
>>1154916
thanks for sauce, apologies for inferiority

>>1151180
WOMEN: your minds cannot handle such complex concepts as ecconomics or science. Do the right thing and know your place!

More research needs to be done on this, in my opinion. It could be something to do with innability, it could be to do with stereotypes, it could be n number of reasons in combination or on their own.

>>1154899
>worked 4 out of 5 times
>happens underground

try harder kthxbai

>>1154748
Titan being a planet, of course.

Give me a theory to work with here. do intelligent civilisations self destruct? is that it?

>>1154863
durr indeed

(75/5)*2=30
(30/3)*2=answer

what site is this?

>>1154848
Zing

>>1154747
you do know trolling is against the rules on /sci/?


you would just get two magnets, both with north and south poles, because when the material making the entire EM field was broken in two the field it created would change to being made around the two magnets individually. If that makes sense.

>>1154679
lolololo

1)what do you base your "low intelligence" idea on?
2) if there's life on ~50% of planets, does this mean there's life on 4 planets in the solar system. Lolno

Why didn't you archive these, guys?

these are archive material and you just let them 404 :(

>>1153604
and this is why I hate capitalism

If I had wanted to earn money I would have become a petroleum engineer and placed put options in my spare time.

Everyone is a combination of genetic and environmental factors, and are completely composed of both of them.

>>1147784
sounds like a very good plan indeed, thanks for the clarity.

>>1147715
should be, certainly. I'll try and ensure they all have 5 answers too