[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.1674770 [View]

OP wants to hide drugs.

>> No.1668682 [View]

>>1668630

Try /b/. They don't see through requests for gay porn like /sci/ does.

>> No.1668189 [View]
File: 31 KB, 433x600, hayley gtfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1668189

I want to see a study of the intelligence of the average atheist compared to that of creationists and creationist leaders taking their money. I figure the atheists would match the leaders, which would be a good deal above the creationists (I remember seeing studies stating the latter).

But how difficult would it be to get a control group of creationist leaders? And what level would you take them from? I'm sure the people teaching Sunday school are probably just as ignorant as the rest of the masses, but I think somewhere up there these people know it's a scam.

pic not related

>> No.1659941 [View]
File: 141 KB, 400x338, jelly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1659941

ITT:

>> No.1659873 [View]
File: 101 KB, 800x600, 800px-Maslow's_Hierarchy_of_Needs.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1659873

Find the target here.

>> No.1659864 [View]
File: 142 KB, 834x749, lolgod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1659864

>> No.1659784 [View]
File: 46 KB, 340x255, conspiracy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1659784

Watching NatGeo. The dimples on the golf balls make them go further.

wat?

>> No.1659455 [View]

Alright, why the fuck do black people smell funny?

THEY SMELL FUNNY, /SCI/

>> No.1659256 [View]

lol, my dad went to school for Marine Biology. He saw that he would likely be taking a paycut from his part-time job so he became a doctor. He fucking rules at it, but he's in debt.

>> No.1659158 [View]

It works. I got a bad headache once from smoking too much.

If you smoke weed, it's like one portion of a marijuana high rather than the complex weave of experiences that make up a marijuana.

>> No.1657536 [View]

>>1657370

You, sir, are a hero to my group of friends in the middle of doing this. I will tell /sci/ about the results.

>> No.1657321 [View]

>>1657311

Vodka. I know my skill is lacking and I don't want to try to be a brewmaster, if I distill and filter vodka enough I should have a good drink.

>>1657302

Oh, I don't expect to survive this, I'm drinking the entire batch at once.

>> No.1657299 [View]

Oh, and I will post pictures of my still as a reward once it's completed.

>> No.1657296 [View]

>bar thread gets a hundred replies

>scientific creation of alcohol gets zero

IMPATIENCE, IT'S TIME FOR ME TO GET DRUNK

>> No.1657280 [View]
File: 172 KB, 511x767, hillbilly19.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1657280

So I'm makin' me some moonshine. Everything is relatively easy with instruction from the Internet, but I'm unsure about one thing. They tell me to pour off the first and last bit of my distilled solution to get rid of the methanol and I suppose something else.

So does that mean that I could, while distilling, just take the first cup that drips out and get rid of it and do the same for the last? Or do I have to let it collect and then pour off the first and last?

Bonus internets for what the substances are that I'm trying to get rid of and a method for removal.

>> No.1657221 [View]

>>1657174

It has been my observation that the intelligent enjoy drugs. A lot. I'm not sure if it's more than the average person, average people enjoy drugs a lot as well.

*slig*

>> No.1657195 [View]

>>1657172

If I took the time to read every piece of shit that idiots recommended to me I would be forced to stop browsing 4chan, and we can't have that.

You expect me to read something that I know will be full of opinions from people who say "there might be something out there" or some shit like that. I know it will involve logical fallacies, and I know it will offer no real evidence other than stories people have told.

How do I know this? Because I do.

Remarkably similar to your "deal with it"

>> No.1657168 [View]

>>1657122

I cannot find the direct source, but if you search "clerical NDE" you find many references to it. I read the original at www.caseagainstfaith.com, so you can call me biased.

>> No.1657138 [View]

>>1657075

I'm not reading a crock of shit, although I have no sauce to put on my claims so you can discredit them if you wish.

>> No.1657117 [View]
File: 292 KB, 490x726, yes_man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1657117

>>1657054

>> No.1657057 [View]

>>1657038

Children have NDEs involving people that aren't dead. People in Eastern countries have NDEs that involve clerks pushing them through the system, apologizing for the mixup once they return.

If you were arguing for the basis of afterlife, they're merely chemicals.

>> No.1657034 [View]
File: 13 KB, 350x350, flask.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1657034

Well, my vodka's dry and my personal stash is running low. Do you have anything stronger? As in MUCH stronger?

>> No.1657028 [View]

... I'm just going to direct you to the book of Genesis and let you find out on your own.

>> No.1657031 [View]

>>1657012

Goddammit never linked

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]