/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14869300
you've got the bog affair all wrong. all of string theory is fraudulent, the bogs attempted to publicize that fact and the bogs were then excommunicated by the academics for the sin of exposing academic fraud at the (supposedly) highest level of academia. (((Schreiber ))) could have written the same exposé of anyone in string theory and would have with anyone didn't go along with the scam. most people in academia are not born with the wealth the bogs had, so they are easy to keep in check by threatening their paychecks, the bogs had so such weakness so they were not as easily influenced, so the corrupt academics colluded to have the bogs ostracized from academia.
academics pull the same trick on dr. malone recently, they did the same to mullis and lot of others too.
this is the type of behind the scenes activity that takes place in order to keep to reproducibility crisis burning hot. if the frauds were not able to use the peer review system to ostracize and silence dissenters then the fraudulent scientists would all be exposed for what they are and dawn would shine on a new golden age of science.

>>14850487
Its a tragedy for the science of climate research that so many of the participants insist on greedily abusing their academic titles and positions to push false doomsday narratives in order to justify enlarged budgets rather than using their positions as climate researchers to push forward legitimate scientific understanding of the climactic environment. Its is easy to assume that the ones who are drawn to the idea of pushing false narratives, are influenced to do so by their inability to contribute to the science on a legitimate, unbiased, scientific manner.
>all this math and physics having to do with convection is way over my head, i'll just screech about fictitious global warming instead of attempting to participate in the intellectually rigorous sector of climate science

>>14736691
they are all propaganda and lies. scientists who contradict the propaganda and lies are "canceled" by the peer review system.

>>14718631
>simulated
>hey guys, my simulation aligned exactly with political leanings
errrrry single time

>>14612664
>with no evidence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy

>>14579831

>>14506517
your career choices are between doing minimum wage field work and sitting in an office producing propaganda for about double the minimum wage.
the propaganda is used to justify "grants" because theres no other way for anyone in the field to get money since they produce nothing of value. the grants are expended on the process of producing more propaganda to justify next year's grant.
if you ever produce any research that contradicts the government/media narrative, the grants will stop flowing and you'll be hounded out of the field

>>14489028