/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15437505
> bros
> science is virtue signalling
shilling for clowns

>>15436522
False assumption.

My free will is an irrefutable fact.

>>15431273
You cant even name a single thing that isnt cgi

>>15430874
another shilled nocebo/alienation

>>15430757
oh, another "nothing real" shill thread

>>15429926
It's the fucking eurofags every FUCKING time. I bully them every night but it doesn't help

>look at me, I omit the "local" in "local hidden variables" so I can be smug about my own failure
Your "joke" has been ruined.

>>15424852
nocebo/alienation shilling

>>15423457
porn spam pseudo science shill entertainment for memerican coomers

>>15418507
shill, you still haven't defined free

>>15416050
another attempt to imply "covid" is real

>>15412726
no. you cannot kill what you imagine by injecting shit. but a dose of DMT+THC would do.

>>15411598
cats eat ass every day and are OK, only you have bad breath from it.

>>15411285
shill, you still didn't define free and consciousness

>>15404010
That was cringe af to read. His style resembles the output of chatGPT: arguments only based on abuse of verbal intelligence with a lot of incoherence and self-contradiction while it becomes obvious to the knowledgeable reader that this guy is a midwit lacking understanding of the math and physics he's talking about. A disappointingly low quality compared to the original CTMU paper (which also was stylistically a mess).
He begins with a ridiculous /sci/-trollish comparison of quantum randomness with the abuse of statistics in the so called social "sciences". His initial answer to Schrödinger's cat paradox is " just ask the cat lol". Then he proceeds with a shitty appeal to local realism, seemingly ignorant of the fact how thoroughly it has been deboonked, only to later desperately try to save his face by shifting non-locality into the realm of some (never explicitly specified) higher level of computation, a shitty plagiarism of Bohmiam pregeometry forced into an unnecessary computational framework.
In a Dennettian fashion he argues against a grossly caricatured version of a solipsism strawman by using elementary school tier arguments, but then in the end his proposed solution is a dysfunctional, intellectually cucked version of distributed solipsism (which can actually be based and black pilled if only he dropped that undergrad CS tier computation theory LARP).

The notion of a set containing or not containing itself is nonsensical. "A not in A" is not even wrong. It's simply gibberish that cannot be meaningfully assigned a truth value. Retarded philosophical language games have no place in math. Russell was the epitome of a midwit.

Math and science are objectively beautiful and morally right because there is a deep a priori connection between truth, ethics and aesthetics. NPCs will never understand.

>>15379096
>dualism is flawed due to the issue of personal identity/how souls interact with the body
Quantum mechanics.

>>15372468
Too bad none of your shallow ramblings about the nature of nondeterministic TMs reveals anything about the space they need to make their computations. NL is clearly a proper subset of NEXPSPACE. Since it is proven that NEXPSPACE = EXPSPACE it follows that NL is not equal to EXPSPACE.

Mathematicians can define them rigorously but physics plebs are too low IQ to understand anything other than hand waving.

NPCs have 100 billion of those and still no consciousness.

>Showing 1 to 24 of 24 licenses

>from first principles
Meaningless soi buzzword. You cannot name any of these alleged "first principles". They're nothing more than an ancient meme.