[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9717499 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1523150686188.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9717499

/sqg/ here

>> No.9711990 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1516560101545.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9711990

>>9711456
>youre nothing more than a highly sophisticated computing machine
Is there a bigger brainlet indicator than unironically believing the "brain gombuter :DDDD" analogy?

>> No.9699469 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, Brainlet_0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9699469

How did you learned trade please?
I just failed my exam today, I am a math and business student, I was planning to move to biology next year but right now I feel like shit, what the fuck I am doing with my life? It seems that I can't study.
So please if you know a way to make 100k/year without"being a genius" tell me. If I can't study at least it would be great if I am not poor.

>> No.9696988 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, iu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696988

I recently realized I don't want to go through life equipped with nothing more than babby math, so I've been trying to figure out why I am bad at math, which has been a painful process. I want to self-learn math and computer science over the next few years.

I've found reviewing precalculus with Stitz & Zeager's book to be the most effective material so far, but I still feel that I have a ton of gaps from checking out of various classes for one reason or another. What is an effective way to identify more of these gaps? Are there any good online tests that will ask a sufficiently varied set of questions to identify weaknesses?

This is especially troubling for me because I do well on standardized tests that just weed out brainlets (770 math SAT, 770 SAT math level 2 subject test) and I feel conceptually strong in calculus, but when I sit down to do a problem set I feel like pic related

>> No.9685941 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, UrABrainlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9685941

>>9685918
Well you are about as intelligent as the floating asses in that universe you showed me.

Remember density is due to mass in a concentrated volume of space. I would rather be dense than an AIR HEAD.

You are so empty you make holes look full! The vacuum of space is fuller than you.
Also. Nice alliteration you empty emaciated egotistical error. You shouldn't be allowed in the genepool.

>> No.9684106 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1517955522335.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9684106

>>9684075
>W-what do you mean space travel doesn't work like it does in Star Wars?
>Y-you guys are j-just scared of change!
Kek. This is what happens when Millennials think that listening to Le Black Science Man and Bill Nye the Mechanical Engineer Guy is the same as actually studying science.

>> No.9684002 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1507428132684.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9684002

>area can't be a complex number

>> No.9678154 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 03F23CE0-7A2E-458D-B2D5-5C67A05D6F57.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9678154

Years ago I would see a shit ton of posts belittling engineer major basically calling them brainlets claiming going applied/pure math superior because it’s more challenging and there are legitimate career paths outside of education for math. What are they? Growing up I was always told to go engineering cause I’m good at math by teachers/parents because if you get a degree in math your only prospects are to work in education. Which is true?

>> No.9677394 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1518140060428.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9677394

>>9674951

>treating science as some entity even though it's just a process used to figure shit out

>> No.9674099 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1523781723475.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9674099

>>9674041
>paragraph is a reddit invention

>> No.9672787 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1512347068367.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9672787

>>9672722
>0 = -0

>> No.9672779 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1512347068367.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9672779

>>967272>0 = -0

>> No.9671905 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, Brainlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9671905

>>9671847
You've assumed all the force from the wings has acted on the base, whereas some will have pressed against the sides and will not affect the scale.

>> No.9666459 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1507428132684.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9666459

>conciousness i more than a buch of biochemical signals going through the connectome

>> No.9665121 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1518140060428.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9665121

>>9664822

I know it's a high IQ thread but I'm a brainlet, I don't know any math. I don't know what you mean by N-1 balls, I'm guessing N - 1 (as in N minus 1), but I'm not sure so I'll just ignore it. At the start, I believe the probability will be 1/N. After each failed turn, N extra balls are added. So, the probability would be 1/(N * number of turns taken). However, you asked for the probability of picking up a ball through out the whole game, at least that's why I understand. How would you represent that? would someone help an IQ 86 out?

>> No.9660277 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1492318486882.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9660277

>>9660198
>he doesn't know what singularity means

>> No.9657318 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1518140060428.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9657318

>>9657293

>> No.9656084 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, adsfsdjhtgerfw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9656084

Does the calculus one course on coursera cover the content of the AP test "calculus AB"?

>> No.9640472 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1510893994361.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9640472

sci brainlets cant follow logic.

>hydrogen gas goes in to the black hole
>i cant see the light from the hole guyz, must be magic cuz my event horizon

its fucking superdense matter you brainlets. mostly hydrogen nucleons in a superdense state. just because you cant see the light doesnt mean you cant use deduction.


>pic related is sci brainlets

>> No.9632844 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, djw8lztokti01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9632844

There is an online course called calculus one:
https://www.coursera.org/learn/calculus1

I was wondering if it covered the topics for tested in AP Calculus AB.

>> No.9631348 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1512076279285.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9631348

>>9631326
>>9631336

>> No.9629230 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1507428132684.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9629230

>>9629113
>air is the same as water
>gas in the same as liquid
>your mouth is the same as your asshole

>> No.9616650 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1519134466886.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9616650

>>9615756
>>9615811

>> No.9606519 [View]
File: 37 KB, 586x578, 1510852859691.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9606519

>>9606445
a)32/21
b)2 (pretty lame)
c)805
d)eh...
e)34

Navigation
View posts[-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]