/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8533887
>there are people who think naive cynicism is realistic worldview.

>>8531032
>tfw there are actually people who let themselves be blinded by their own ideology into denying the science

back to >>>/pol/ you go

>>8507654
>Lab work at an high school

>>8498705
OMG!

>Arguing over engineering
>Implying that's even a science

>>8468678
>buzzwords
>IQ

>>8468999
nice bait

>>8468767
getting a gf has nothing to do with solving an equation
protip: the explanation is not scientific

>>8457625
>If you're an inventor, you're responsible for how people use that technology.
That's either some decent bait, or some idiotic logic.

>>8425220
>being this retarded

>>8417964
>not recognizing bait

>>8383555
>he didn't buy any bitcoin

>>8360138
>he doesn't see the virtues of idleness
>he subscribes to the protestant work ethic

>>8314753
>still believing in "peak oil"
>believing that oil is a "limited resource"
>fag probably believes in global warming too

>that girl who "revises" uses mindmaps

studies have shown that they're basically worthless.

>>8293576
its just a shame about the spatial resolution, anon. especially in a field like catalysis...

i know they say it doesn't matter, but...

Let

[math]E_{1}=[0,1)[/math]
[math]E_{2}=[0,2)[/math]
[math]E_{3}=[0,3)[/math].

Put [math]E=E_{1}\cup E_{3}[/math].

Let's show that according to mathematics, sometimes [math]E\subset E_{2}[/math].

Pick [math]x \in E=E_{1}\cup E_{2}[/math].

If unfortunately [math]x[/math] is such that [math]x \in E_{1}[/math] then you have [math]x \in E[/math].

You couldn't possibly have know that since you pick a random [math]x\in E[/math].

You just falsely showed that [math]E \subset E_{2}[/math].

Common sense says that [math]E\not \subset E_{2}[/math] since [math]3 \not \in E_{2}[/math].

Checkmate.

Mathematics: [math]0[/math].

Common sense: [math]1[/math].

>he doesn't know fractional calculus

>He writes his hypotheses as [math]H0[/math]/[math]Ha[/math] instead of [math]H0[/math]/[math]H1[/math]

>>8209407
>The bible is not falsifiable because it is the truth
> You cannot falsify something that is objective, universal truth

So its not provable, or measurable or testable or even falsifiable ?

>believing in climate change
>2016

>Solving a problem by trial and error
>Not understanding underlying concept

Ever think of picking up a trade?

>>8151010
>muh L1 tube

>>8130074
>It seems like Mars, for example, at some point will just be an extension of the Earth.

>>8111912
>he thinks water is blue

>>8106285
I'm a girl and finishing my masters in applied math at top university in germany and I'm <top5%. You're just mad your girlfriend cucks you