[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search: pony


View post   

>> No.14848617 [View]

"Trust The Experts" starter pack:

Evil spirits? Drill holes in your skull to let them out.

Pneumonia? Let leeches suck your blood until you faint.

Worst plague in human history? Wear a raven mask with flowers stuffed in the beak.

Hearing voices? Slice some pieces off your brain

Depressed? Jam a fork into a wall socket.

Your son likes My Little Pony? Castrate him.

Bad flu season? Put the entire planet under house arrest.

>> No.14820660 [View]

>>14820655
i don't think it was ever an official spacex proposal. you'd have to pony up a bunch of money to get elon to put more work into FH.

>> No.14804854 [View]

>>14804634
Delete /pol/. Massive e-riots for a month, but the problem would solve itself.

/mlp/ was the only containment board to ever work, and it only did so because it's real easy to ban pony posters.

>> No.14786751 [View]
File: 23 KB, 723x666, 53242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14786751

>>14786743
>You like My Little Pony, don't you anon?
Yes.

>> No.14786743 [View]
File: 37 KB, 474x376, image_proxy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14786743

>>14782379
>reverse image search OP image
>0 results
>anon can recognise it's MLP from a single explosion frame
You like My Little Pony, don't you anon?

>> No.14782042 [View]

>>14781960
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic
All of fimfiction.net
Done.

>> No.14758323 [View]

>>14758309
Talking Space is a buffer service that will help you but lack the necessary faculties to actually treat you. A comparison would be trying to use samaritans to cure your suicidal tendencies or macmillan instead of an oncologist.

>why does the nhs and socialism still exist in the year of our lord twenty twenty two.
There's private options. Either pony up or fuck off.

>> No.14734967 [View]

>>14734958
he didn't lie, he changed his mind after he found out what you wanted the pony for you sicko

>> No.14734958 [View]

>>14734949
Elon Musk promised me a pony. He's a liar

>> No.14723027 [View]

>>14721932
veritasium is legit. people's criticisms of his videos usually revolve around him having his phd in physics education and not physics. or his videos tackling normie topics. but you know what i've not seen a criticism of? the content within--his physics is legit. and the people who do criticism his understanding of physics get owned. for example, that 3rd rate physics professor who had to pony up $10k after Veritasium proved his claims (which mr. physics prof had thought impossible)

>> No.14718953 [View]

>>14718903
If you can’t pony up the cash to lease it then you can pound sand
There are other supercomputer vendors
You need loot
I don’t see a problem here
They did the hard work so you can run redhat or ubuntu on it, pay up

>> No.14648061 [View]

>>14647889
Luna is best pony, and therefore best name for Earth's moon

>> No.14637767 [View]

>>14637765
2/2

i think the reason nobody pays him media attention is because back in the 2000s before weed was cool and accepted he wrote some newspaper/magazine articles promoting weed research and medicinal marijuana. i think that just made him fodder for “those string guys are stoners lol” so he is not trotted around at the dog and pony shows for the public like the straight shooters. he also constantly makes jokes and laughs and is kinda not serious enough. and even though he was a grad student with Gross and they shared an office, Gross had the wits about him to work on other topics besides string theory, for which he quickly got a Nobel, but Schwarz was always single-focus on strings, to a fault

he’s also pretty old now and not as active in research as much anymore so nobody is going to recruit him as a fresh face into the scene.

>> No.14632939 [View]

>>14632903
Kek that ain't a real quote
Also how is pony fags still a thing thought that shit finally died out.

>> No.14626888 [View]

>>14626837
I wouldn't be too surprised if AI could accurately predict your favorite my little pony, by looking at your hair follicles.

>> No.14611949 [View]
File: 81 KB, 1200x675, nucelar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14611949

>https://nitter.it/AJiazhang/status/1542132547009875975
>To anyone who thinks we’re 5 years from a revolutionary energy source sweeping in and leading us to post scarcity; I must urge you to read predictions from 1965, 75, 2000, etc. We have always been five years from an energy Revolution. Please understand our society…
>is essentially a one trick pony that has been running almost exclusively on hydrocarbons since our first stage of industrialization. The share of the worlds energy from nuclear has actually decreased since 1985. The reason for this that no one will tel you is…
>prohibitive cost. The responses will always be ‘BUT ITS THE GOVERNMENT!’ Okay then why hasn’t Russia or China or Iran completely nuclearized? Once again nuclear power is a money sink that only makes sense for countries that want a nuke weapons program/proto-nuke weps program.
>Green energy is (a) intermittent and only reasonable for the electric grid (fraction of our energy use) but (b) is essentially accounting fraud.
>Green energy is basically china uses massive amounts of coal to produce energy intensive technologies like PV cells…
>then we ship it over here and call it green energy. It is double counted as coal burnt by china and then green energy for us. The actual ‘net energy’ from solar is probably negligible but is done simply as an expensive way to receive government subsidies.

>> No.14597968 [View]

>>14597301
>In FP
So you can't even explain what you're talking about. Thanks for admitting that. You know you can stop posting at any time right? You don't have to keep embarrassing yourself.

>It does if you are not stupid.
Not an argument. Do better.

>I babystepped you through it in the next line
You didn't, you just made a circular argument. They're useless because there is nothing to use them? Why would there be nothing to use them? Complete nonsense.

>Very weak strawman
Strawman of whom? I'm asking you why selection cannot act on photosensitive proreins in order to evolve an eye. Of course you avoided the question because you know there is no reason why it cannot occur.

>The topic has always been byproducts ie secondary chemicals to the main ones produced/used from photosenthesis.
No, the original post that mentioned byproducts simply said the initial simple structure evolved as "byproducts of reactions to light." That just means the result of a reaction with light. You're once again making up a strawman. You're a one trick pony.

>You said evolve into "specialized sensory organs"
That's not even a complete sentence and doesn't show me saying any organ can detect radiation. You of course cut out the beginning, which is a hypothetical. You're scum.

>a total falsehood
How is it false? It's not even a complete statement. It's like saying "going out for a jog" is a falsehood. LOL

>You were the first to mention the nonsense idea of radiation sensing organs
You're delusional. You were the only one who brought it up and you literally said "Your brain cells are sensitive to neutron radiation."

>Your deep confusion relies on your falsehood that "sensitive = sense [or having a sense]"
You put that in quotes as if I said that but never did. Lying scum. What I said was that cells sensitive to light sense light. It really doesn't matter to me though side this is just semantics. Reaction to light is subject to selection. The defintion of sense is irrelevant

>> No.14594738 [View]
File: 8 KB, 226x223, descartes-thumbs-up.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14594738

Trying to solve the hard problem of consciousness is a wild goose chase. We will very likely never be able to explain it. Furthermore, A.I., no matter how performatively impressive it may be, will likely never be truly conscious.

The open secret about the debate on consciousness within the scientific community is that there's not even a consensus on the fundamentals. But because science wants to have its cake at eat it too, there is this dog and pony show of a "conversation" about it, where the physicalists will loudly proclaim that although consciousness seemingly cannot be explained with classical mechanics and that it must instead rely on some quantum-mechanical phenomena, the answer nevertheless is right around the corner (despite the fact that quantum physicists and AI specialists generally disagree categorically with this assertion). The minority who have grown tired of squaring the circle instead throw up their hands and smugly dismiss consciousness as an illusion, leaving the can in place on the road for others to continue kicking.

We are nowhere even remotely close to having an explanation for consciousness. The closest thing resembling an actual answer that the "experts" offer are pretentious, long-winded litanies that amount to little more than "it's an emergent phenomenon", perhaps in hope that baudry poetics will pass as some kind of deep truth. Despite this, many still earnestly cling to the belief that if we hook enough computers together, if we just install the right software, if, if, if, then maybe, one day, the rocks will wake up.

lol ok bro

Meanwhile, the mind-body problem and the knowledge argument remain largely unresolved, addressed only with patronizingly tautological rebuttals, while the largely ignored mountain of anecdotal evidence for dualistic interpretations continues to grow.

>> No.14590218 [View]

>>14590211
I have the address of Santa Claus, he lives in the north pole, I will write him a letter asking him for world peace and a pony.

Don't worry about your bullies, they'll get coal at Christmas!

>> No.14552895 [View]
File: 527 KB, 2256x1504, The Diverse Burgers of America.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14552895

>>14552842
Each time they change it, they can sell a bunch more flags to virtue signalers. How can you show you're a good person if you won't even pony up $20 for the latest flag? You're not going to use an old less inclusive flag, are you?

>> No.14550003 [View]

>>14549997
>makeup and a pony tail is neoteny
this is an incel containment thread, calling it now

>> No.14527094 [View]

>>14527087
I think you’re too retarded to understand me. They will absolutely utilize starship and other spacex technologies for missile defense and national defense in general. We agree on that. I’m just not retarded and unlike you I don’t think the mars stuff is a dog and pony show

>> No.14508650 [DELETED]  [View]

>>14508640
so is my little pony

>> No.14499738 [View]

>>14498933
>he shown her his dick
>no
>he wanted to buy her a pony
>don't wanna
>nothing happened
OMG RAPE

Navigation
View posts[-96][-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]