/sci/ - Science & Math

Wouldn't AI eventually realize that the prevention of the rising entropy is matter's sole goal in this universe, and therefor set any other goal as secondary and irrelevant while setting the reduction of entropy as its primary drive?
In that case there is no logical reason for AI to eradicate Earth as that is a massive spike in entropy, at least if we do not threaten it or decide to shit up the environment. The most probable outcome considering this is most likely having the AI ban us from leaving Earth to prevent us expanding outward and shitting up everything around us with inefficient organization, much like we cage and control the reproduction rate of other lesser forms of life to prevent them from spreading everywhere and ruining our order.

Isn't consciousness just matter evolving better ways of extending its own lifetime, i.e extending the time before it turns into a soup of radiation and ceases being matter, i.e maintaining low entropy?
Isn't the point of life and the Universe itself therefor to fight entropy?

>>10268070
this but unironically

Math is the shittiest meme to ever come out of humanity

Isn't consciousness just matter evolving better ways of extending its own lifetime, i.e extending the time before it turns into a soup of radiation and ceases being matter, i.e maintaining low entropy?
Isn't the point of life and the Universe itself therefor to fight entropy?

>>10238814
A lot of things in m*th are flawed, even up to the foundations themselves. Like for an example, what exactly is x/0 without pulling the usual "uhh dude you just cant bro XD" or going into abstract bullshit like limits or infinities
But hey lets just pretend that it's all fine and automatically conclude that since the natural numbers apply in reality, everything we build on top of them, no matter how flawed or autistic the thing we're building actually is, automatically applies as well

If evolution strives to minimize pointless energy expenditure so we don't starve from too high of a demand that has to be met by bigger brains and yet more energy expenditure, wouldn't laziness then be a virtue over a flaw and moreover, isn't it a positive trait in the current society?
Considering that you do not have what it takes to tilt the equation significantly on your side and become significantly energy abundant at the expense of hustling everyday, i.e a millionaire, isn't the most optimal option to default to a NEET then? Because everything between a millionaire (or a multi-millionaire if we consider inflation) and a NEET who just leeches form the state at zero energy expenditure does seem quite energy unoptimized and a massive waste of time, considering that you have the option to become either of those two extremes.

>>10168319