/sci/ - Science & Math

http://www.ancientpages.com/2015/10/06/physical-evidence-of-ancient-atomic-wars-can-be-found-world-wide/

What do sci thinks of nuclear glass sand being found on the sahara deserts that is similar to nuclear tests sand?

Why don't we use modern technology to make steam machines again?

Is not like fucking heated water is going to pollute.

passed Calc II the fourth time I took it, now I can finally get to take my engineering classes my fifth year into college

>>10006135
to put penis vagina

>>10004656
Pssst....

Its impossible to get to infinity. Of course x/(x+1)^n doesn't sum 1. What the fuck do you think 0.999.... is for?

Why do Math and Physics majors keep telling me my meteorology degree is useless? Why are you so mean?

how hard is to learn to use a neural network (AKA some tensorflow library) to get shit like making a neural network that will take my voice and make it sound like an anime girl or a videogame character?

ok faggots, I have one idea for something that could get you a nobel prize or make you rich.

Imagine a sort of paint that could store sun light as energy somehow and then when there's not sun light it starts to shine like a bulb.

pls steal my idea, I'm just some NEET schizo with million ideas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dqXHHCc5lA

do u think better nutrition is a good alternative treatment to non infection diseases rather than what the pharmaceutical industry shills you in college?

I'm trying to ask if a lot of illness aren't simply better treated by improving the patient nutrition?

Why is psysiognomy considered a pseudoscience?

https://reason.com/blog/2012/12/13/american-iqs-in-1900-averaged-67-points

Are Igbos the smartess breed of blacks?

I can't find a legit source of their IQ.

Any legit ways? I'm a big, big dumbo. I've never been smart and I'd just like to feel smart once in my life.

I got 124 IQ on this test https://mensa.dk/iqtest/ but at least I'm not THAT dumb to realize only ways to test iq is professionally.

Help a brother out.

Isn't like 95% of engineers and STEM guys in the industry males?

>>9755480
>my mother remarried and gives blowjobs to a man who isn't my father

A:
0.9 + 0.1 = 1.0
0.99 + 0.11 = 1.10
0.999 + 0.111 = 1.110
0.9999 + 0.1111 = 1.1110
[math]0.\overline{9} + 0.\overline{1} = 1.\overline{1}0[/math]

B:
1 + 0.1 = 1.1
1 + 0.11 = 1.11
1 + 0.111 = 1.111
1 + 0.1111 = 1.1111
[math]1 + 0.\overline{1} = 1.\overline 1[/math]

A = 1.11111...110
B = 1.11111...111

B > A

>failed the uni dining hall entry exam

>>9715927
>Riemann integrals are not exact solutions

>children are hitting puberty at younger and younger ages
Should the age of consent change as well?

>>9533140
> a = 0.999... && b = 0.000...1

Are we smart animals because of hypergamy?

I mean, chimps are dumb as fuck because their females aren't picky.

>>9475750
Right so you meant that the set is not the elements of [math]\frac{x}{y^-k}[/math] at k per index, but that the the indicies are the sums of k to that index.

Then i already answered that with the non-convergent precise sums 0.999...{1/2} and 0.999...{9/10}, or
>At a maximal real number, there would be a supremum real number amount of 9's in T compared to an infinum real number of 9's followed by various random digits in S, so that T > S

SupT for n is a set of n size whose each digit is 9 and every index is the past index with another 9.
SupT = [math]\mathbb{U} \sum_{k=1}^{n}
\frac{9}{10^k} = \big{ 9, ... \big}_{n} [/math] and
SupS = [math]\mathbb{U} \sum_{k=1}^{n}
\frac{1}{2^k} = \Bigg{ \big{ 9, ... \big}_{n×0.3} + \bigg{ \sum_{k=n×3}^{n} \frac{1}{2^k} \bigg} \Bigg}_{n}[/math]

Without precisely concatenating as [math]0.\bar{9}_{\frac{1}{2}}[/math], its difficult to precisely extrapolate what a maximal number from S would look, and wont be able to provide you an answer that hasn't already been provided beyond SupT|SupS being element n, which do not equal each other.

How would /sci/ design a PC that isn't basically a von neuman machine?

>>9399927
fuck just found the fatal flaw with intermantissa

[math]0.\bar{905} + 0.\bar{286}[/math]
with the fuckin intergarbafe countable sensibility gives me 1.a0b when it should be 1.a9b, but since i dont treat [math]\bar{9}[/math] like a normal number i cant sum 9 even under arbitrary circumstances mother fuuuuuuuuuuuucker.
fuck it fails basic addition and ita like only useful for multiplication.
i still don't think [math]0.\bar{9}[/math] exists as a normal number without crafting it from an infinite sum