/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10357337
damn einstein is shaking in his boots rn

>>10356915
You’re right I fucked up the math and did a quadratic equation because I had an x^2 leftover.

>>10341915
Everything. All I know to do is how to compute sine, cosine, etc.

>>10322035
>drones are just big flies

>>10320657
>center of mass then
>constantly moving the flagpole so that your retarded question is legitimate

if it's finite then sure it has a center of mass, but there will almost certainly be no way to ever prove this by the very nature of having an accelerating expansion. there's already a horizon around us whereby light past that point can no longer reach us

http://wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2013/09/17/where-is-the-center-of-the-universe/

>what the fuck has expansion to do with center? either it has a center or it doesn't
picrelated

Typical manic. I remember when I started some powerful antidepressants in my teens I went full manic for 2 days. I could see the meaning of everything. I started seeing patterns everywhere and thought I solved the meaning of the universe. Then it wore off and I realized I was retarded. Long story short, OP is definitely bipolar. Sucks for him.

>>10316549
>The scientific field of psycometrics is pseudoscience
>source: my ass

I shit you not, I mean what I said.
I am pretty good at grasping things, understanding them and applying them correctly, but I need to dwell on something for so fucking long to actually do so. Partly it may be due to me getting hung-up on definitions and concepts, but I feel I end up thinking about menial things for way too long, and it's starting to seriously be a hindrance; I can hardly keep up with my study course, because it will take me just so freaking long to actually understand the logic behind something.
Some time ago I went to a psychotherapy and when we were essentially done but still had some sessions left over I asked to take an actual IQ test for shits and giggles. It couldn't be graded because there was such a discrepancy between pretty much everything else, where I scored in the 130s/140s, and "processing speed" or whatever you'd call it, where I scored in the lower 90s ("Processing speed assesses the speed at which an individual processes information and the ability to react to the information. Processing speed sub-tests address nonverbal learning through the visual modality. Visual discrimination, selective attention, and visual-motor dexterity. Sample test items include searching for a specific symbol given a page of symbols, and identifying all animals among a group of pictures in a timed setting.", seems like what I remember the category measuring, from what I found in a website).
Does anyone here have any advice? I'd honestly appreciate it.

tl;dr
I'm a brainlet at coming to conclusions fast, even though I'm ok elsewhere. I'd appreciate any advice.

>>10237556
This. Wouldn’t solar wind be toxic? Also, what keeps people on the inside of the sphere? Won’t they just fall into their sun?

>>10220256
learn to write:
>>10220007
>you need asymmetric encryption such as RSA
>No you don't. It's just used now as a hashing algorithm for key having in AES.
WHAT is used as a hashing algorithm? Do you even know what a hashing algorithm is?
(wait while you look it up on wikipedia and desperately try to not look like a total mong)

>>10208005
>he thinks undergrads learn advanced number theory and PDE

>>10207798
>I care about the significance of my work
>electrical engineers install cable

fuck off, cunt

What's your take on science ethics?

>>10166506

>>10030015
>Those were a century ago.
>QM and Relativity are all solved and there is nothing new to discover

>>10017809
>>10017858
>>10017866
>>10017878
>>10017880
>>10017933

so how do i stop being a brainlet? say i have no background but high school science from years ago. where to start learning?

>>9974089
>not using the bait meme

>>9962386

>>9913595
>>9914100
>>9912586
>>9920054
>>9920765
>>9920992

>>9887687
Attraction and cohesion of particles with mass.

>pi is infinite

>>9876577
>sage all fields