/sci/ - Science & Math

math BTFO

Correction:
Now, it's easy to see a(i),b(i),b(i)+1 form a promitive Pythagorean triple.

>>14530372
that's the wrong schizotriangle though

>>12802546
This guy gets it.

I stopped caring about math when I was introduced to the concept of imaginary numbers. What a crock of shit. If your equation can only be solved by inventing numbers that can't exist, like some kind of math deity, then you are fucking wrong and the math is flawed. Same for algebra solutions that basically say "the correct answer is whatever the correct answer is". Thats what the math said transcribed to words but god forbid if i wrote in down in english instead of the ancient math runes the teacher word mark me wrong.

Math is logical and numbers never lie my ass. Math is just as flawed as any other human construct.

bros how the fuck did we get completely mogged by fucking /biz/ >>>/biz/29182655 ?
this is so humiliating

>>12620268

>implying math is not gay

OP is right. To complement, here's the pic /sci/ couldn't debunk.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MY RATIONALIST CIRCLEJERK IS ACTUALLY SUPERIOR TO APPLIED ALGORITHMS STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP PLATO HELP ME PLEASE

should m*th, alongside any other rationalist circlejerk, be outlawed for the sake of humanity?
If every m*them*tici*n in the world became a physicist instead we'd have fusion-powered spaceships by now. It's like an overgrown tumor on top of our collective brain power that's draining the most brilliant people of every generation for no other reason but because m*th is supposedly the hardest subject, when it's the easiest since all you need is an imagination and a piece of paper

They are nonsense. Pic related shows how easily complex numbers fall apart.

>>11709438
And how do you construct a circle of a zero radius?

>applying complex numbers
yeah how about we actually do that

*ahem* let me introduce you to null numbers
[math]\frac{1}{0} = n[/math]
[math]\frac{x}{0} = xn[/math]

Every "contradiction" that comes after this is pure distilled cope. This is objective reality.

>b-but what's [math]n[/math] supposed to be then?
what's [math]i[/math] supposed to be then?

>>11577324
uhh why not just like uhhh
like [math]\frac{x}{0} = xn[/math] where [math]n[/math] is the null number that equals [math]1[/math] once multiplied by 0?

like this
[math]\frac{3}{0} = 3n[/math]
[math]3n * 0 = 3[/math]

>math
>>>/x/

>>11461656
>>11461676
Math is for autists who can't engage with the real world and solve real problems

>>11456444
So uhhhhhhhhh the angle between the red leg and the hypotenuse is the solution to [math]\sin\theta = \frac{1}{0} = И[/math]
what do now?? what angle is that?

>>11263710
Not if time is imaginary, then it all makes perfect sense
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_time

300k won't solve this edish

>>11243911