6 different kind of SEX/ set of chromossomes

[Anonymous No.8481351]

http://www.joshuakennon.com/the-six-common-biological-sexes-in-humans/

Is there any truth to this?

[Anonymous No.8481353]

>>8481351
I don't wanna give views to whatever retardation this is, take a screenshot, pastebin, archive or gtfo

[Anonymous No.8481379]

>>8481351
Nope, anything with Y is biologically male, anything with one or more X is biologically female.
Usually unless you're XX or XY you are infertile, so in biological terms anything other than this has 0 fitness and does not contribute genes, therefore is about as useful as a rock.

[Anonymous No.8481383]

>>8481379
>anything with one or more X is biologically female
So people with XY chromosomes (~50% population) are both simultaneously male and female?

[Anonymous No.8481490]

>>8481351
>X – Roughly 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000 people (Turner’s )
>XX – Most common form of female
>XXY – Roughly 1 in 500 to 1 in 1,000 people (Klinefelter)
>XY – Most common form of male
>XYY – Roughly 1 out of 1,000 people
>XXXY – Roughly 1 in 18,000 to 1 in 50,000 births

Fuck, so almost 1 out of 200 people are not XX or XY? why the hell are humans so defective?

[Anonymous No.8481500]

>>8481490
human biology (well, really all multicellular animal biology) is a horrific clusterfuck

it's like if you tried to build a ladder out of rotten sticks from the woods, using chewed up gum as glue. we only see the 1/100 times that someone managed to climb that ladder without it immediately falling apart

[Anonymous No.8481512]

>>8481351
Female
Male
Genetically defective infertile monsters.

There are only three sexes.

>>8481490
Those numbers are way too high. Its like fags claiming 10% of people are gay.

[Anonymous No.8481576]

>he cares about sex and gender

[Anonymous No.8481593]

>>8481351
A "sex" that plays no crucial part in the reproduction of a species is no sex at all. There are males, there are females, and there are deviants and defective examples of either. Fertility is the only sensible measure.

[Anonymous No.8481633]

>>8481383
>Anything with Y is biologically male
It's like you can't read or something.

[Anonymous No.8481663]

>>8481379
>anything with Y is biologically male
Anon, anon, anon
There are disorders where this isn't the case
CAIS
Swyer

[Anonymous No.8481665]

>>8481379
>>8481663
>anything with one or more X is biologically female
Oh and also de la Chapelle syndrome

[Anonymous No.8481667]

>>8481665
and Klinefelter's

[Anonymous No.8481669]

>>8481379
You haven't finished your general bio sequence have you

[Anonymous No.8481681]

>>8481490
XYY basicallly means you're hyper masculine. XXX doesn't really do much for women

[Anonymous No.8481691]

>>8481681
>hypermasculine
Not really

[Anonymous No.8481697]

>>8481490
There is far more variation than just this. Basically the X and the Y can be slightly like the other, they aren't always 100% one way or the other.

[Anonymous No.8481757]

>>8481691
Taller and hairier on average

[Anonymous No.8481760]

>>8481757
Sure but the IQ doesn't fall and there hasn't been any evidence that XYY males rape more than the average man

[Anonymous No.8481769]

Fuckckkk I think I might have klinefelters guys

>my hips are kinda wide, but im overweight so idk if thats the reason
>18 and cant really grow a beard, only moustache and chin hair

I think my testicles and dick are an OK size though
dick is 7 inches hard and my testicles are just under 2" in length, like 1.9

also my pits are pretty hairy and im not tall (5'10)

do I have it or not

[Anonymous No.8481772]

>>8481769
No.

[Anonymous No.8481773]

In humans, the biological rule is this:

Presence of a Y chromosome --> male;
Otherwise --> female.

References can be found on the wikipedia page for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneuploidy#Types

[Anonymous No.8481784]

>>8481757
Not hairier. XYY is generally benign and has no effect, other than being on average 3 inches taller, but it is believed that most people with XYY don't even know it. So that statistic should be taken lightly.

[Anonymous No.8481799]

This is cultural marxist bullshit

[Anonymous No.8481814]

>>8481799
>cultural marxism

[Anonymous No.8481829]

>>8481799

[Anonymous No.8481830]

>>8481814

Is that supposed to invalidate what iv said?

[Anonymous No.8481836]

>>8481814
>>8481829
oh hello there libtard. where have you been?

[Anonymous No.8481841]

>>8481830
It's merely an instruction for you to return to your white nationalist hugbox. Shoo shoo now.

[Anonymous No.8481844]

>>8481836

[Anonymous No.8481848]

>>8481841
Do you have any evidence that this poster is a white nationalist or are you shitposting because of your deeply ingrained racism?

[Anonymous No.8481851]

>>8481848
>posts a pepe image of american history x
>b-but i'm not white nationalist guise pls don't bully me

also
>>8481848
>>8481830
>>8481799
same fat faggot

[Anonymous No.8481858]

>>8481851
>greentext
greentexts are not evidence dear BLM rapist. sorry about that :(

[Anonymous No.8481859]

>>8481858
>>8481851
>>8481830
>>8481799
samefag

[Anonymous No.8481862]

>>8481859
evidence?

[Anonymous No.8481863]

>>8481862
same posting style, also do you have any evidence that everyone who disagrees with you is "BLM"?

[Anonymous No.8481868]

>>8481863
>same posting style
you even know what evidence is you rapist piece of shit? Do you know anything else other than stealing flatscreen televisions and blaming people with racism when you're found guilty?

[Anonymous No.8481870]

>>8481868

[Anonymous No.8481871]

>>8481868
>you rapist piece of shit? Do you know anything else other than stealing flatscreen televisions and blaming people with racism when you're found guilty?
Do you have any evidence of these claims?

[Anonymous No.8481874]

>>8481769
>>I think my testicles and dick are an OK size though
klinefelters patients almost universally have tiny testicles. I'm talking like, millimeter scale.

It's possible to be XXY without that symptom but it's rare.

[Anonymous No.8481878]

>>8481871
>I don't know what evidence means.
It figures. Slamming the keyboard with tears until they put you back in your cage isn't the same as studying science is it? But how would you know the difference.

[Anonymous No.8481882]

>>8481878
That's not evidence. Can you show me any evidence for any of the accusations you've leveled?

[Anonymous No.8481888]

>>8481882
After you

[Anonymous No.8481892]

>>8481888
>I don't know what evidence is
>I don't know what the burden of proof is
Figures. Please keep to your containment board >>>/pol/ and keep our board /sci/ free of filth such as yourself, thanks in advance!

[Anonymous No.8481905]

>>8481892
>b-back to p-pol
Why do SJWtards can't help from exposing their cancerous appereance. And why are you here if you hate science?

[Anonymous No.8481909]

>>8481351
Trannies dont have extra chromosomes though so this is not tumblr, we already knew about genetic freak shows involving chromosomes.

[Anonymous No.8481920]

>>8481905
You don't have any interest in science beyond "lol xddd these charts prove niggrs r dum" so fuck off back to >>>/pol/ where you belong.

[Anonymous No.8481930]

>>8481920
This isn't a BLM rally where you get to call the people you haven't even seen raycust with zero evidence. Please refrain yourself from posting. There's a reason why we put you disgusting cancer of the society in jail cells.
>>>/trash/
and stay there

[Anonymous No.8482558]

>>8481667
>>8481665
>>8481663
>Klinefelter
Literally males
>Swyer
Literally males

[Anonymous No.8482602]

>>8481379
>Usually unless you're XX or XY you are infertile,
XXX females are fertile.

XXY males are not normally fertile but can reproduce with medical intervention.
What I want to know is: can the same be said for XXXY people? And if so, are their reproductive cells male or female?


>>8481691
I've heard conflicting claims on the effects of XYY. Some have said there's little effect, while others have said they're normally very violent and almost certain to end up in prison (though I have also heard that said about XXY). Does anyone have an authoritative link?

[Anonymous No.8482697]

>>8482602
>they're normally very violent and almost certain to end up in prison
that was the original thought, based off one study done in a single prison

it was poor science and very outdated, the consensus now is that it has little phenotypic effect