[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 8 KB, 214x235, ap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15946883 No.15946883 [Reply] [Original]

Mathemically speaking, is it possible for all of radiowaves watt energy emitted such as satellite networks, 5G and radio be responsible for melting snow in midair and causing winters to become less snowy in last few years?

>> No.15946906

>>15946883
The change in solar irradiance due to climate change is 0.5% of 1361 W/m^2 (1,2). If we multiply that by earth's surface (3) we get 3.5PW (petawatt). Your satellite network would need that power. According to (4) (note: I converted 14500Mtoe to 1.69e17Wh/year which then equals 20TW) the world power production is 20TW (terawatt), so it is possible mathematically speaking (everything is), but not physically speaking.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_irradiance#Variation
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_irradiance#Irradiance_on_Earth's_surface
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth#Surface
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_supply_and_consumption#Total_energy_supply

>> No.15946944

>>15946906
>due to climate change
i can probably ignore all your equations because your fundamental source is from delusional fanatics with suicidal tendencies, anyone else?

>> No.15946966

>>15946944
There won't be anyone else because to get to any equation you will need a delta in energy (or rather power). You will not find this number from any "non delusional fanatic" because those "non delusional fanatics" you talk about don't understand the world as far as to use said numbers to describe it. But go ahead and measure the solar irradiance yourself. Then try to do this on a multidecadal level and correct my estimate delta. Good luck, have fun.

>> No.15947330

>>15946966
buzzwords, how hard is it to melt snow in mid air? whats the average energy of EM fog? you dont need all that other nonsense