SHUT IT DOWN

File: 153 KB, 1151x797, key findings from the NTP studies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:28:32 2019 No.10822820 [Reply] [Original]

SHUT

IT

DOWN

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:29:26 2019 No.10822829 >>10822820 >other shitty 5G thread pruned and deleted >immediately posts a new one mods pls

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:30:35 2019 No.10822831 >>10822829 >oy vey the goy exposed our stealth goy killer weapon >SHUT IT DOWN PLEASE

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:31:05 2019 No.10822836 >>10822820 This is what some don't understand, Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause anything, on the SHORT TERM in long term it fucks cells up

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:31:48 2019 No.10822839 >>10822836 better engulf all the goy countries in it 24/7 first then

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:32:14 2019 No.10822843

>"The levels and duration of exposure to RFR were much greater than what people experience with even the highest level of cell phone use, and exposed the rodents' whole bodies. So, these findings should not be directly extrapolated to human cell phone usage," said John Bucher, Ph.D., NTP senior scientist.

dose is inapplicable to normal exposure levels and everyone in this thread is retarded

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:34:09 2019 No.10822846

>>10822843
https://ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/

Fact: The NTP study was designed to mimic long term human exposure to cell phone radiation and to test the adequacy of safety limits.

The NTP study had three radio frequency radiation exposure levels which were 1.5 W/kg, 3 W/kg, and 6.0 W/kg. These radiation exposures are the same and only slightly higher than a person gets while using a cell phone to the head. For comparison the US FCC exposure limit for cell phones is 1.6 W/kg (about the same as the first exposure group) and the FCC limit for extremities such as the arms, legs and ears- the limit is 4.0 W/kg (more than the second exposure group). The 6.0 W/kg was a level that is not even twice what we allow to our arms and legs. This study was designed to test if government safety limits (which only protect us from thermal radiation levels) are protective of human health and the NTP findings indicate these limits are not protective. The exposures of the brain in the NTP study were not very different from human exposures associated with use of cell phones. It is standard practice for rodent studies to have experimental groups with higher exposure levels than average human exposure in carcinogenicity studies. Many teens sleep with their cell phones and people most commonly hold phones against their ears and body, while cell phone manufacturers and carriers have resisted efforts to warn people not to do so.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:37:23 2019 No.10822858

>>10822846
>The exposures of the brain in the NTP study were not very different from human exposures associated with use of cell phones

Mice also generate tumors at significantly higher rates than humans do, and in some cases exhibit greater sensitivity to mutagens than we do.

If this is a real signal, where is the epidemiological data? I get that ethically we can't run toxicology trials on humans, but why do we see no greater concentration of cancer in EMF hotspots when normalized to things like air pollution and demographics?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:38:08 2019 No.10822862 File: 225 KB, 786x668, melanoma and transmitter density.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10822858 uhhh

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:39:10 2019 No.10822868 File: 144 KB, 1019x584, GBM.Denmark.1995-2017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10822858

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:39:22 2019 No.10822869 >>10822862 First, I'd want to actually see the source material. Second, I emphasize the importance of 'normalized to things like air pollution and demographics' because obviously more urbanized areas have more cancer.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:42:57 2019 No.10822880
File: 126 KB, 926x764, 2G vs 3G cancer rates.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10822869
I believe it's this paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270005635_A_Melanoma_Trend_Forecast_from_2002_-_what_happened_then

Air pollution lmfao

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:43:43 2019 No.10822883 >>10822862 >R^2 = 0.417 Literally fucking worthless, imagine posting that with a straight face

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:46:57 2019 No.10822892

>>10822880
Normalizing to these things is just due diligence for this kind of study. People in cities live longer (thus increasing per capita risk for things like colon and prostate cancer that are heavily age dependent), have access to better diagnostic infrastructure, and are exposed to more potential mutagens like car exhaust and smog. For melanoma you should also look at lifestyle as well - how much time do they spend outdoors? Obvious racial components as well due to skin pigmentation (although that may be less important in Swedish communes lol)

I'm pretty sure you would find the same sort of association if you regressed melanoma risk against population density. This doesn't mean that looking for the effect of EMF on melanoma risk is impossible, you just have to adjust for confounding variables.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:47:20 2019 No.10822893

>>10822820
Why are you pretending anyone cares? 5G will still roll out and the majority of the population will never even begin to notice your perpetual freakout over it.
You're free to move to a far from civilization patch of wilderness and live in a log cabin.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:47:59 2019 No.10822895 >>10822883 I don't agree at all with the woo about 5G causing cancer, but for epidemiological studies, R^2 = 0.417 is actually extremely strong correlation for just one variable in your model. Humans make noisy-ass data.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:48:57 2019 No.10822900 >>10822892 look up Andrew Marino and read his books on this topic

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:49:28 2019 No.10822905 >>10822893 He could also wear a tinfoil suit with a tin foil hat.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:50:17 2019 No.10822906 File: 1013 KB, 1090x643, this kills the 5G tranny.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10822893 this strikes fear into your heart

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:50:30 2019 No.10822908 >>10822831 >>10822839 Why do Nazis hate technology? You do realize America is only on top in the 21 century because of California right? The same libs y

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:50:33 2019 No.10822909

>>10822900
while I get that this may be an obsession for you, asking someone to literally read a book to respond to your 4chan thread is not reasonable

if you can give me some snippets of information to pique my interest, I might be more willing to spend my free time on it

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:53:05 2019 No.10822914

>>10822908
why wouldn't conspiracy theorists gravitate towards blaming everything on a highly insular religious group that's very small but has weird and ancient mythology wrapped up with it?

as a jew I think it's ridiculous that we get blamed for everything but people like alex jones didn't give a shit when trump went to go touch a glowing orb with the Saudi king in a weird ritual. how the hell does that not rile up the theorists?

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:53:24 2019 No.10822916

>>10822909
it is entirely reasonable. this is a huge topic and will be the basis for the medicine of the future, rooted in quantum biophysics. if you want a head start you'll look into acquiring Marino's books.

here's the book's page on his website: https://andrewamarino.com/goingsomewherebook/message.html

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:56:10 2019 No.10822922 >>10822908 >>10822914 when is 5G for Israel first and open borders for Israel happening

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:56:10 2019 No.10822924 >>10822916 >quantum biophysics I've published biophysics papers and this is entirely not a term that anyone uses

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:56:26 2019 No.10822925 >>10822900Reminder that this spammer is an avid reddit/discord user. See the link below where he posted a picture of his own desktop. Look at the bookmarks and programs in the taskbar. https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/216583385/#216593256

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:57:11 2019 No.10822927 >>10822924 my dad is CEO of nintendo too

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:57:13 2019 No.10822928 >>10822922 probably never - I'm not a big fan of netanyahu or most israeli politics anyway jews (especially american ones) aren't a monolith and there is plenty of criticism of israel by jews

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:58:30 2019 No.10822933 >>10822928 whaaaat you dont want open 5G borders for israel right now? fucking anti-Europeanite

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:59:08 2019 No.10822935 >>10822933 what is a '5G border'?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 17:59:47 2019 No.10822938 >>10822935 a border that keeps all the 5G in israel

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:00:14 2019 No.10822939 >>10822938 so a giant faraday cage?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:00:59 2019 No.10822943 >>10822939 what happens when you put a microwave transmitter in a faraday cage

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:02:18 2019 No.10822949 >>10822943 it blocks them? that's how the oven keeps it inside the cooking area. the cross-hatched pattern on the front of the glass door is actually part of the cage

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:03:05 2019 No.10822952 >>10822925 proof that that's the based OP

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:23:12 2019 No.10823010 >>10822893 Thats the fucking point you asswipe. No one cares and its part of the plan. You are being mind controlled into not caring

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:26:58 2019 No.10823020
File: 1.46 MB, 1138x950, war-gamed the science.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>The herd published experiments that mimicked all the errors I had seen so often since my education in how science really worked had begun.
>Krause analyzed an enormous amount of meaningless data and found nothing, a technique that Richard Phillips had pioneered.
>Fritzer compared the brain waves between two different groups of subjects and should have known that the natural variations were far greater than any potential impact of the EMFs, which was another trick used by Phillips.
>Inomato-Terada slammed the brains of his subjects with magnetic fields so intense that their muscles contracted, and then measured whether the contractions were affected by puny mobilephone EMFs, like Phillips who had squeezed big rats into little cages which effectively hid the smaller stress effect produced by EMFs.
>Roschke played the game that was most common among the investigators who favored Motorola’s point of view, which was to average the results from subjects whose measurements went up with the results from subjects whose measurements went down, and then report there were no changes, on average.
>I had thought no one was better at that game than Phillips, who used it to prove to the satisfaction of the power industry that male and female mice in the three generations were not affected by EMFs, even though the opposite was true.
>In the twenty-first century, however, the method of obfuscation by averaging was improved.
>Wagner averaged the data along three dimensions so a positive effect was triply unlikely. Kleinlogel did it twice, in two identical experiments. Hamblin also did it, and then professed surprise she found no effects.
>Nothing these investigators did was worth doing, but they did it well, at least from Motorola’s perspective.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:27:47 2019 No.10823022 File: 128 KB, 500x347, spongebob.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823010 >5G poisoned our water supply, burned our crops, and delivered a plague unto our houses! >"It did?" >No! But are we just gonna wait around until it does?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:28:59 2019 No.10823026 >>10823022 This post sponsored by Motorola™

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:29:40 2019 No.10823028 >>10823026 everyone who disagrees with my conspiracy theory is a shill for the opposition

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:30:15 2019 No.10823031 >>10823028 why wont 4chan stop gangstalking the poor innocent telecoms industry

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:30:54 2019 No.10823032 >>10823031 why won't retards stop flooding /sci/ with non-scientific schizo bullshit?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:32:16 2019 No.10823035 >>10823032 the science is not in your favor hence the spergouts dump scat

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:34:46 2019 No.10823041

>>10823035
your entire theory is based on bullshit 1960s studies that fail to replicate in a modern controlled environment

the definition of pseudoscience is shit that looks like science (is written in a paper, uses instrumentation, maybe even has a PhD as an author) but doesn't replicate and doesn't teach us anything new

sure your cranks have 'responses' to the dozens of people that have tried to recapitulate their findings, but the bottom line is that if independent labs can't make your signal show up, then it isn't real and the planes aren't landing

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:36:05 2019 No.10823046

>>10823041
Intoxicated with physics, the herd, and other experts who
sympathized with them, argued that all reliable responses were robotically
reproducible, a state of affairs that is antithetical to the behavior of every
living thing, from the tiniest virus to man himself, all of which desperately
fight to stay in being and, in doing so, exhibit behaviors that are never
precisely predictable and are often inconsistent with those of others of its
species. No solid, liquid, gas, or man-made object struggles for existence, so
each behaves today as it did yesterday and will tomorrow. Among EMF
studies, inconsistency is to be expected.
The law governing human reaction to EMFs is particular to each person
and not, in any important way, general like the laws of physics. Life does not
point beyond itself to pithy equations. There is no deep theory behind
biophenomena. The biophenomena are the theory, so an answer regarding
whether EMFs cause harm can’t emerge from the same process that
successfully explained the behavior of air, water, fire, and earth. Attempts to
do so are based on a kind of lawfulness, embodied by equations, that is alien
to life.

Tobacco does not reliably cause cancer.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:39:23 2019 No.10823055 why is /sci/ so shit lads

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:39:58 2019 No.10823057

>>10823046
>argued that all reliable responses were robotically
reproducible, a state of affairs that is antithetical to the behavior of every
living thing, from the tiniest virus to man himself, all of which desperately
fight to stay in being and, in doing so, exhibit behaviors that are never
precisely predictable and are often inconsistent with those of others of its
species. No solid, liquid, gas, or man-made object struggles for existence, so
each behaves today as it did yesterday and will tomorrow. Among EMF
studies, inconsistency is to be expected.

very poetic but just because you argue life is noisy doesn't mean your irreproducible studies aren't bullshit.

maybe the signal is real and just hard to detect, but that's your problem to deal with. nobody is obligated to accept your bullshit just because it 'should have replicated'

>The law governing human reaction to EMFs is particular to each person
and not, in any important way, general like the laws of physics

This is kinda like arguing that a person who wins at the slots is just special compared to everyone else. You don't get to claim that your experiment was just magically 'correct' when everyone else can't get it to happen. That is the opposite of how modern science works.

>Tobacco does not reliably cause cancer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_(person)#Crank_magnetism

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:42:29 2019 No.10823063
File: 867 KB, 365x274, BIZARRO.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10823010
>No one cares and its part of the plan. You are being mind controlled into not caring
No, not caring is the default. You don't need to "mind control" anyone to get them not to care about possible health risks of a new telecom networking standard. Most people couldn't even tell you what a cellular network generation actually constitutes even if you put a gun to their head and demanded they describe it.
>>10822906
>this strikes fear into your heart
Yeah, exactly. You keep pretending you're somehow terrifying a bunch of shadowy 5G orchestrating psychopaths who inexplicably hang out on an anime website's "science" discussion board.
This is way weirder to me than the idea 5G will cause serious health problems. Causing serious health problems is a completely legitimate concern to be interested in. It's the conviction you're having some covert internet battle with people working to implement 5G that puts you into mental illness territory.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:44:35 2019 No.10823066 >>10823057 the NTP study got you all worked up though dont pretend >>10823063 all this projection is pretty yikes dude, chill out have sex

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:45:42 2019 No.10823068 >>10823066 >the NTP study got you all worked up though dont pretend not really, since the investigators themselves claim that it's not applicable to humans

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:46:05 2019 No.10823069 >>10823068 >SD rats >not applicable to humans h-hehe

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:46:41 2019 No.10823070 >>10823046 Tobacco is non-ionizing.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:47:10 2019 No.10823071
File: 616 KB, 2352x916, 1560476193366.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

These outlets are fervently Pro-5G to the point of using propaganda to distort science:

>BuzzFeed
>Vox
>NYT
>Ars Technica
>Washington Post
>Yahoo!
>NBC
>CNN
>Fortune
>LAtimes
>LinkedIn

From: https://ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/

All kike propaganda outlets.

If all these subversives are telling you that Microwave radiation is good for you, your parents and brothers and sisters and children to be subjected to, at all times, then maybe, just maybe... it's not?

Just a thought.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:47:15 2019 No.10823072 >>10823069 Rats that develop tumors if you look at them wrong.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:50:04 2019 No.10823077

>>10823071
the funny thing is that even if you think you're a soldier in the war against the evil shadowy 5G empire, you're immediately discrediting your views to normies by dragging the jews into it

I genuinely believe that conspiracy theorism should be divided into its own subtype of schizophrenia

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:50:32 2019 No.10823079

>>10823072
>the reality wasn't radiation causing the difference between control and experimental groups, it was that the scientists looked at the control rats less
>everyone is really afraid to publish the study on scientists with carcinokinesis powers

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:51:30 2019 No.10823080 >>10823077 stop projecting your crackpot headcanon and have sex bro chill who hurt you?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:51:52 2019 No.10823082 >>10823077 >you're immediately discrediting your views to normies by dragging the jews into it Hey, you understood the plan!

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:52:02 2019 No.10823083

>>10823079
sprague-dawley rats are tumor-making machines. they do it at random and in response to environmental stressors

which is why they're the strain of choice for cranks who want to prove that intervention B made a 'statistically significant' increase in tumors (p = 0.0473)

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:53:28 2019 No.10823084

>>10823066
>projection
I'm projecting a belief that I'm terrifying 5G promoting agents who inexplicably hang out on an anime website?
Pretty sure that's not something I believe. A lot more plausible is that's something the anons literally claiming they're "striking fear into [the] heart" of 5G pushers believe in.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:54:20 2019 No.10823086 >>10823079 Since you're so familiar with the study go ahead and tell me how many tumors the control rats got.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:54:39 2019 No.10823088 >>10823080 >"jews are controlling all the media and trying to use 5G to mind control us" "anon that sounds pretty crazy and schizophrenic" >"hurr bruh stop projecting, haev some sex bro"

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:55:02 2019 No.10823090 >>10823083 Further proving the hypothesis that the researchers used their psychokinetic ability to cause cancer in the rats.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:55:11 2019 No.10823092 >>10823088 I don't think he understands what "projection" means.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:55:30 2019 No.10823093 >>10823088 >everyone who disagrees with 5G is the same goy

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:56:05 2019 No.10823094 >>10823093 Everyone on /sci/ is actually one schizo who has disassociated completely.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:56:17 2019 No.10823096 >>10823090 carcinokinesis sounds like a cool power for a sci-fi retrofuturism novel

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:57:25 2019 No.10823098 >>10823020 I note the shilling increased massively after this post. >SHUT IT DOWN!

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:57:27 2019 No.10823099

>>10823093
seeing as how these threads are spammed on a bi-weekly basis with the same exact set of brainlet reaction images and out-of-context plots, I made the hasty assumption that it's just the same wacko pushing this bullshit here time and time again

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:59:18 2019 No.10823105

>>10823090
>psychokinetic
Why do you keep trying to make that retarded attempt at satirizing?
A hemophiliac child would be prone to bleeding and bruising more often than a child without that condition. This doesn't mean the hemophiliac child's parents are telekinetically causing their child to bleed and bruise.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 18:59:43 2019 No.10823106 >>10823020 In psychology, these are all considered valid methods.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:01:45 2019 No.10823111 >>10823105 we have basically a complete genetic understanding of why that kid bleeds more, often down to the specific polymorphism that caused it - where's the mechanism of action for 5G mutagenesis?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:02:22 2019 No.10823112 >>10823106 good thing psychology is not science

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:05:30 2019 No.10823121

>>10823105
Wait, you genuinely don't understand what the implications were of saying "those rats always get cancer, so it doesn't matter if there was a significant trend with another variable"?

In your analogy, it would be like if you had two groups of hemophiliacs in identical conditions, made some invisible environmental change that wasn't expected to directly cause bruising and that group bruised a lot more than the one without the control. Then you write it off as due to hemophiliacs bruising "when you look at them" and therefore the environmental change must have done nothing.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:06:35 2019 No.10823123 >>10823055 Because the mods are far too slow at removing obvious spam threads

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:06:47 2019 No.10823124 >>10823111 Knowing exactly why something happens is not a prerequisite for knowing that it does happen. The pathogenesis for many medical conditions is unknown or poorly understood.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:08:29 2019 No.10823127

>>10823121
>Wait, you genuinely don't understand what the implications were of saying "those rats always get cancer, so it doesn't matter if there was a significant trend with another variable"?

it means your experiment is off-model from humans that don't spontaneously generate tumors due to years of inbreeding

the compelling part about showing necropsies of mice full of tumors having received treatment B is that tumors aren't normally supposed to happen. If your strain just makes tumors all the time, is it just the luck of the draw or did it actually make a difference? did the coil whine off your EMF generator stress the rats out and make them grow more tumors? who knows

adding in copious amounts of controls is standard for animal work, and there is no excuse to use that kind of model for this sort of research

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:09:31 2019 No.10823131 >>10823124 you're correct - I was just illustrating that the hemophilia analogy is a poor one

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:10:54 2019 No.10823135

>>10823093
>I'm n-not that poster
Yeah okay, you're definitely not the same person that spams the exact same talking points time and time again who also has an active thread right now on /g/ where he copies and pastes his replies to and from. Definitely not that guy. Got it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:11:23 2019 No.10823137 >>10823135 why are you monitoring 4chan for threads about 5G?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:11:29 2019 No.10823138 >>10823135 Given the reaction it gets here, I see no reason to think it's always the same person.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:20:25 2019 No.10823160

>>10823127
>it means your experiment is off-model from humans that don't spontaneously generate tumors due to years of inbreeding
That's great. It's still sufficient to demonstrate there still might be something going on and that there should be further research instead of declaring it safe and forcing it on the entire planet.

>is it just the luck of the draw or did it actually make a difference?
If only there was some sort of value scientists could use to display how likely an outcome was purely by random chance under the null hypothesis.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:23:29 2019 No.10823173 File: 32 KB, 408x632, 08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823137

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:26:27 2019 No.10823181

>>10823137
A large group of people who post on /sci/ also post on /g/, the board on which your shit thread has been up for literal hours.
>>10823138
>I see no reason to think it's always the same person

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/text/5g/type/op/page/4/

https://boards.fireden.net/sci/search/image/S_vm45C4HBN9LtC_t5c8tA/

https://boards.fireden.net/sci/search/text/5g/type/op/

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/S_vm45C4HBN9LtC_t5c8tA/#

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/text/ionizing/type/op/

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:27:52 2019 No.10823185 >>10823181 Gonna copy and paste the OP so I can join the new hivemind.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:28:44 2019 No.10823186

>>10823181
Why are you evading questions about why you are monitoring multiple boards on 4chan for 5G threads/posts? and why are you compiling massive amounts of archived posts on users you think are all one anti-5G poster?

This behavior is rather strange. Certainly not becoming of an organic 4chan user.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:29:49 2019 No.10823193 >>10823186 >he doesn't compile multiple enemies lists with all posts likely to be from them Maybe you're not the real 4chan user, doesn't sound like you're autistic enough.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:30:50 2019 No.10823194 >>10823193 >compile enemy list >all posts anonymous >no identifiable info impotent lel

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:32:17 2019 No.10823197 >>10823194 You can recognize a poster by the smell of their words. That's why 4channers hate people with big noses.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:32:18 2019 No.10823198

>>10823160
>That's great. It's still sufficient to demonstrate there still might be something going on and that there should be further research instead of declaring it safe and forcing it on the entire planet.

no one is obligated to delay the progress of technology to spend decades probing what's most likely just a false positive

>If only there was some sort of value scientists could use to display how likely an outcome was purely by random chance under the null hypothesis.

hey dipshit, the null hypothesis assumes the only difference between the two populations is your treatment variable. if stressors caused by the experiment are making one group grow more tumors, your p-value tells you something about the stressors, not EMF

I swear, scientists should be obligated to prove they understand how statistical tests work before ever publishing a paper with p-values in it

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:33:02 2019 No.10823202 >>10823197 OPs words smell of zyklon. oy

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:34:04 2019 No.10823204 File: 70 KB, 646x667, shinjyo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823198 >it's just a false positive bro, probably kerosene in the cars

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:34:09 2019 No.10823205 >>10823198 >what's most likely just a false positive I bet you call yourself a "skeptic".

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:35:09 2019 No.10823207 >>10823204 your experiment is off-model from aliens that don't spontaneously generate symptoms due to years of inbreeding

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:35:59 2019 No.10823208 >>10823204 oh cool another plot with no methodology or context to establish whether it's meaningful or not

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:36:09 2019 No.10823209 File: 1.35 MB, 1066x800, smeter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823207 just a coincidental false positive, probably air pollution from nearby ants nest

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:37:09 2019 No.10823211 >>10823209 those trees just die if you look at them this proves nothing

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:37:48 2019 No.10823212

>>10823205
maybe use studies from scientists with the brains and foresight to not use a spontaneously tumorigenic animal model in their carcinogenesis experiment (like, for instance, one of the dozens of commercially-available rat and mouse strains that don't do that)

i would bet my entire phd stipend that none of you idiots have ever stepped into a lab

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:37:49 2019 No.10823213
File: 1.05 MB, 1536x2048, WhitePine29Sept2016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10823207
>>10823208
haha just a little funny false positive on that one bro

>>10823208
http://it-takes-time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Shinjyo-2014-Significant-Decrease-of-Clinical-Symptoms-after-Mobile-Phone-Base-Station-Removal-.pdf

>Our intention was to examine whether there were health impacts on residents from RF-EMFs emitted by the mobile phone base station erected on the roof of their condominium building. We conducted thorough research on whether there were any other factors to account for the improvements of the residents’ health other than the removal of the base station.
>The results of this case report indicate that health problems of the residents were associated with the operation of the mobile phone base station and that these problems improved after its removal. Although this report is not a double-blind study, it can be used as an example indicating the potential effects of RF-EMFs emitted from mobile phone base stations erected on the roofs of condominium buildings on human health. It is imperative that further detailed research is conducted regarding the impact of RF-EMFs on human health.

fucking wacko schizo crackpots and their woo science bro, false positives all over the place. probably believe in the ether too lmao, orgone

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:39:14 2019 No.10823218

>>10823186
>Why are you evading questions
?
>why you are monitoring multiple boards on 4chan for 5G threads/posts?
Who said I was "monitoring" anything? I browse both /g/ and /sci/, much like you browse both reddit and 4chan.
>why are you compiling massive amounts of archived posts on users you think are all one anti-5G poster?
By "compiling massive amounts" you mean 5 simple links to archival sites right? Maybe if your spamming style wasn't so predictable and consistent I wouldn't be able to catalogue your entire post history using 5 simple searches.
>you think are all one anti-5G poster?
We've already established earlier that you browse both /v/ and /sci/&/g/
You post the same images you post on /g/&/sci/ to /v/ regularly, hence why half your threads use fallout/half life images in the OP post. This also ties in nicely with the fact that you're a massive redditor, as /v/ has a very high concentration of reddit users.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:39:24 2019 No.10823220 >>10823209 >trees never die and it was the smart meter that did it (n=1) good post anon

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:41:48 2019 No.10823225

>>10823213
>haha just a little funny false positive on that one bro

literally there is no way for me to interpret your evidence without knowing what the experiment was

>http://it-takes-time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Shinjyo-2014-Significant-Decrease-of-Clinical-Symptoms-after-Mobile-Phone-Base-Station-Removal-.pdf

not peer-reviewed and only 'published' on a sketchy italian website about the dangers of EMF

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:42:40 2019 No.10823226

>>10823218
you are spending hours poring over image compilations of what you think are my posts. you have probably a spreadsheet database of what you think are my posts and have categorized them as "confirmed/likely/possible". you scour the archive and have a ticker that alerts you whenever "5G" is posted on 4chan, any board. you have even enlisted help to attempt to clamp down on anti-5G sentiment in the last thread that mysteriously disappeared after you called in a favor with your jew pedo mod friend

watch your back kiddo

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:43:15 2019 No.10823227 >>10823209 Seems like room for an experiment. It shouldn't be too hard to estimate how much that tree was absorbing and try it with other plants. If it's killing plants, it shouldn't even take a full 2 months to see an effect.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:43:23 2019 No.10823229

>>10823121
>Then you write it off as due to hemophiliacs bruising "when you look at them" and therefore the environmental change must have done nothing.
An environmental change doing something to a test subject which has a condition of easily provoked medical problems doesn't have to mean it matters at all for a normal healthy population.
Would you prove exposure to common and typically mild or even completely asymptomatic pathogens is seriously harmful or even fatal for the general population just because your test subjects were immunocompromised (e.g. AIDS patients)?
Pretty sure that's all the anon bringing up a strain of rats being notoriously prone to tumor generation is getting at here.
Lots of totally harmless things for 99.99% of the population could be extremely harmful for 0.01%. Doesn't mean there wasn't an environmental mechanism for it, just that the mechanism isn't necessarily anything relevant to the general population, especially when you're talking about an entirely different species on top of all this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:44:09 2019 No.10823231 >>10822908 >America is on the top in the 21st C lol. keep dreaming big guy.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:44:36 2019 No.10823233 >>10823225 tons of peer reviewed literature on Bioinitiative.org all saying the same thing get stuck in

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:47:10 2019 No.10823237 >>10822908 >The same libs y y?

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:47:57 2019 No.10823239

>>10823226
>you are spending hours poring over image compilations of what you think are my posts.
What makes you think I spent hours poring over image compilations?
>you have probably a spreadsheet database of what you think are my posts and have categorized them as "confirmed/likely/possible". you scour the archive and have a ticker that alerts you whenever "5G" is posted on 4chan, any board. you have even enlisted help to attempt to clamp down on anti-5G sentiment in the last thread that mysteriously disappeared after you called in a favor with your jew pedo mod friend
>watch your back kiddo
https://www.psycom.net/paranoid-schizophrenia

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:48:04 2019 No.10823240
File: 215 KB, 766x704, cargo_cult_science.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10823233
>>10823213

this 'study' is actually laughably bad. they added together a dozen completely insignificant effects and summed it together, then used Fisher's exact test to show that their condominium data set (which is really just n=1 for this experiment) showed a 'statistically significant increase' in health problems

I'm really curious how the one person with glaucoma suddenly had it cured after they removed the tower. That's kind of a chronic illness, isn't it?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:48:31 2019 No.10823242 >>10823237 ignore the shizo jew, he skitzhos every thread his scitzo ass finds itself in

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:49:33 2019 No.10823246 >>10823239 just chill dude have sex >>10823240 tons of peer reviewed literature on Bioinitiative.org all saying the same thing get stuck in

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:50:50 2019 No.10823247

>>10823246
>tons of peer reviewed literature on Bioinitiative.org all saying the same thing

you mean they used this same bullshit p-hacking strategy that the cargo cult scientists did in your last paper?

curious who the 'peers' are in this review, Andrew Wakefield and the Bogdanov twins?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:51:45 2019 No.10823250 File: 139 KB, 1324x752, industry vs non industry studies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823247 probably not the WHO emf committee who are all ex-telecoms

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:52:35 2019 No.10823251

>>10823229
The point isn't that it would prove it causes the same effect universally, it's that you can't say "there's no effect because they were already predisposed to that outcome" when there's a statistically significant difference between groups. That anon wasn't saying it might not effect other people, he genuinely thought the rats being predisposed to tumors meant the control group having fewer was just luck:
>If your strain just makes tumors all the time, is it just the luck of the draw or did it actually make a difference?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:52:35 2019 No.10823252 >>10823233 if[argument == 0] { print("refer to bioinitiative.org"); }

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:53:53 2019 No.10823254 >>10823251 He's being massively disingenuous. The tumors the exposed rats acquired are attributable to microwave exposure. Similar heart/brain tumors pop up all the time in RADAR operators.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:54:11 2019 No.10823255 >>10823250 see I think there might be other variables at play here if your standard for a 'non-industry study' is shit that a high school student does for their AP statistics class

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:54:56 2019 No.10823256 >>10823252 Sorry but you've posted no science thus far proving 5G is safe. The other side has provided ample evidence and high quality study after high quality study.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:55:28 2019 No.10823258 >>10823250 And who would know better than the people who make the products?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:56:13 2019 No.10823259 File: 290 KB, 633x698, no insurance.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823255 see >>10823020 Industry 'research' is low quality and this is intentional. Insurer behavior says it all.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:56:19 2019 No.10823260 >>10823256 >Sorry but you've posted no science thus far proving 5G is safe. except for all of the papers that try to replicate these EMF animal experiments and fail to show harm >>10823020

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:57:15 2019 No.10823263 File: 203 KB, 1200x821, 52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823258 lol

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:57:41 2019 No.10823265 >>10823259 why would an insurance company cover made-up illnesses in their plan? likewise I don't think they cover Unbalance Of The Humors or 'having too much blood' under their policies

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:57:45 2019 No.10823266 >>10823256 >thinking things pushed by massive industries need to be proven safe

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:58:17 2019 No.10823268 >>10823260 >All these bunk studies that failed to show results Wow!

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:59:49 2019 No.10823271

>>10823268
Failing to show results is synonymous with showing something is safe. No effect of the treatment group on cancer risk/death/etc is the null hypothesis of a toxicology experiment. The best you can ever do is fail to reject the null hypothesis. Didn't they cover this when you took statistics as part of your science degree?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 19:59:52 2019 No.10823272 >>10823265 If it's just wacko made up hibbery jibbery why not just cover the transmitters without comparing the situation to asbestos in one of their advisory reports? (Lloyds of London)

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:00:53 2019 No.10823275 >>10823271 There are tons of studies showing tobacco is safe. So let's give kids 5 packs a day to smoke now ok. Especially the White kids.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:00:55 2019 No.10823276 >>10823272 And asbestos is safe and effective, so what's the problem?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:02:00 2019 No.10823279 >>10823276 Exactly, many industry studies show thalidomide to be a great way to reduce morning sickness. Let's give it to White rural Christian mothers, Moshe.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:02:05 2019 No.10823281 >>10823275 This is literally the only feasible way we could solve the problem of black kids being cooler.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:02:37 2019 No.10823282 >>10823275 >tobacco is safe This but unironically. Liberal think tanks perpetuated the meme that tobacco is harmful

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:06:24 2019 No.10823289

>>10823275
>There are tons of studies showing tobacco is safe. So let's give kids 5 packs a day to smoke now ok.

there are a handful of older studies showing it's safe, but literally thousands showing it's not

this goes back to what I said about replicability being the core of how science works. if we assume that effects are distributed normally (which in life sciences they often are), then a certain percentage of the time, a group will get the wrong result just due to bad luck. what matters more is what the literature says in the long term, and the question of tobacco being carcinogenic has pretty much been answered now

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:07:32 2019 No.10823292 >>10823289 a long-term review of the literature can be found at Bioinitiative.org

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:08:02 2019 No.10823294 >>10823282 Most, if not all, the oldest recorded people smoke/smoked, so you might be on to something.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:08:20 2019 No.10823295 >>10823292 I'm thinking you maybe have some affiliation with that website that you've spammed in this thread over and over

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:08:33 2019 No.10823296 >>10823289 We've known these signals are dangerous since the Moscow signal incident. Likely before.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:09:23 2019 No.10823297 >>10823296 so why are most independent groups incapable of replicating these findings, when a handful of investigators who write books about the dangers of EMF seem to be able to pump out new papers on it at an annual basis?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:09:26 2019 No.10823298 >>10823296 >blaming it on the russians Clearly this is all a hoax.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:10:16 2019 No.10823300 File: 526 KB, 1800x1800, img_46481.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >scientists are lying to us about the safeness of 5G >they're being 100% truthful about the shape of the earth though Imagine being a ballhead in 2019

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:11:33 2019 No.10823304

>>10823297
this has been explained via the excepts from Marino's books ITT.

You know the actual cancer causing mechanism for tobacco is unknown, right? Same with asbestos. Same with microwave radiation. But it exists.

2 are banned or heavily restricted.1 is about to be heavily restricted.

Stop getting in the way of progress.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:11:52 2019 No.10823306

>>10823295
It's his go to response when he realises he's arguing with someone who actually knows what they're talking about, because he doesn't actually understand the things he parrots and therefore can't properly defend them.
See: literally any of his previous spam threads that have gotten responses

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:12:57 2019 No.10823309 >>10823306 this is what they call a "cope" post on other boards you are "coping"

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:14:31 2019 No.10823311

>>10823304
>You know the actual cancer causing mechanism for tobacco is unknown, right?

pretty sure I've seen literature looking at the mechanism of action for how certain tobacco mutagens cause DNA damage

at the very least, long-term smoke inhalation is going to scar your lungs, and scar tissue is inherently more prone to becoming cancerous.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:15:30 2019 No.10823312 File: 44 KB, 612x612, truth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823300 There's only one theory that explains everything.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:15:44 2019 No.10823314

>>10823309
Barring maybe two people in this thread, I don't think here anyone agrees with you. 'Coping' is what you do when your side is losing. 5G is going to be implemented and the vast majority of people are not convinced nor care about the woo you're selling here.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:16:07 2019 No.10823315 >>10823311 sure but the mechanisms for all those mutations are entirely unknown- "no consistent evidence" is an excuse you could use to keep tobacco killing kids. it's the excuse you use for microwaves killing kids.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:16:50 2019 No.10823317

>>10823309
Nope, a cope response is one in which is made when the poster cannot adequately counter an argument and tried to downplay/sidestep the other poster's point, exactly like you do when you run out of stock responses and instead just repeat the tired old "refer to bioinitiative.org" line.
Cope.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:17:12 2019 No.10823319 >>10823314 type 5G into fb or yt, people are waking up big time the threshold was crossed probably a month ago and now it's too late to stop what comes next

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:18:01 2019 No.10823321 >>10823315 It's not a real issue. The kids will grow up, enjoy 4K porn on 5G (your data cap runs out in 5 minutes, but that's all you really need), and provide income to whoever is making the best cancer treatments at the time.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:18:49 2019 No.10823322

>>10823315
>sure but the mechanisms for all those mutations are entirely unknown- "no consistent evidence" is an excuse you could use to keep tobacco killing kids.

It's abundantly clear that they're carcinogenic though, which is ultimately what matters.

There are literally hundreds of known carcinogens in a cigarette. You could use sanger and bisulfite sequencing to figure out specifically what's happening to DNA upon exposure to your given mutagen, but that's not really worth the money unless you have some reason to believe that specific compound is special or important.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:20:16 2019 No.10823325

>>10823319
Like I've told you before: the average person has literally no interest in 5G except the supposed speed increase they'll see from it. Normal people are not actively seeking out public discussion on 5G. The only people actually posting about it are people like you who have severe and misplaced grievances over it. Literal textbook negativity bias.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negativity_bias

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:20:42 2019 No.10823326

>>10823319
unless it becomes public policy, nothing will happen. anti-vaxxers failed to prevent hospitals from giving up vaccines, so the same with your bullshit.

fortunately you can protect yourself with faraday cage technology. to protect your most vulnerable organs (like your brain), simply take some conductive material (such as aluminum foil) and fashion a protective garment that you can wear whenever you're driving near a cell tower.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:22:25 2019 No.10823327

>>10823317
trying to appear snide with passive aggressive snipes while obviously licking your wounds is a big cope in any book

>>10823321
it's already getting shut down en masse in Australia and every week a new city puts a moratorium until 5G is proven safe (so never)

>>10823322
it's also abundantly clear that microwaves are hazardous to health at this juncture. the NTP study wasnt needed but it fully cements the reality that EMF emissions need to be massively reduced.

>>10823325
jew mental gymnastics

>>10823326
>attempting to conflate anti-vaxx with anti-5g
cope

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:22:58 2019 No.10823329 >>10823263 I like viceroys.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:23:49 2019 No.10823332 >>10823327 >cope ask your anti-5G friends about their opinions on vaccines and I think you'll find something surprising it's called 'crank magnetism'

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:24:42 2019 No.10823335 >>10823332 >crank magnetism this is woo, but wasnt there a very recent vaccine study that showed kids that were vaccinated had massive increases in allergies and rates of ADD? hmm makes you think possibly

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:25:14 2019 No.10823338 >>10823272 because people literally have fake electricity based illnesses that shouldn't be covered, it's like being transgendered, if something can't be tested experimentally it's not worth debating.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:25:34 2019 No.10823339

>>10823327
>trying to appear snide with passive aggressive snipes
Such as? Do you deny constantly falling back on referring to bioinitiative.org when you run out of arguements?
>it's already getting shut down en masse in Australia
[Citation needed]
>every week a new city puts a moratorium
[Citation needed]
>jew mental gymnastics
Imagine being so retarded you can't understand a concept as simple as negativity bias.
>attempting to conflate anti-vaxx with anti-5g
You literally admitted to being anti-vax in a previous thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:25:44 2019 No.10823340 File: 117 KB, 320x263, 78.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823332 huzzah, le man of science is here

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:26:27 2019 No.10823342 >>10823335 >wasn't there a very recent study that shows kids that were vaccinated.... no.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:26:32 2019 No.10823344 >>10823332 >people who believe large corporations are putting profits over safety also believe large corporations are putting profits over safety Seems likely.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:26:55 2019 No.10823347 >>10823340 >calling others redditors when there is literally photographic evidence that you have reddit in your bookmark bar Bold move

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:27:34 2019 No.10823348 >>10823335 >hmm makes you think possibly It better make you think "safe and effective" and nothing else or we're gonna have a problem.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:30:42 2019 No.10823352

>>10823338
it can be tested experimentally though, see NTP study retard

>>10823339
the more Bioinitiative.org is posted, the more people will look at it

Look up Ray Broomhall

https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/expert-claims-5g-roll-out-3108121
3 councils in UK have put moratoriums on 5G

>jew telling me about posts in a previous thread
schiz

>>10823342
saw it posted around various sites. it was definites real

>>10823347
ive never taken a photograph of my laptop or any computer ive ever used

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:38:04 2019 No.10823362 >>10823352 >either hasn't read or doesn't comprehend the NTP study it literally shows nothing of significance.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:38:54 2019 No.10823363 >>10823362 >clear evidence of cancer >no significance

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:39:42 2019 No.10823364

>>10823352
>It's getting shut down en masse in Australia
>can't provide examples
>every week a new city puts a moratorium
>a new city
>every week
>three councils in the UK
W E W
>jew telling me about posts in a previous thread
Why do you think your public posts suddenly become off limits once a thread gets archived?
>ive never taken a photograph of my laptop or any computer ive ever used
Okay pal, keep pretending you aren't the anon who posted >>10822925 despite the fact that you spam the same links and use the exact same talking points

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:42:23 2019 No.10823370 >>10823363 clear means seethrough

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:42:39 2019 No.10823371

>>10823364
Ray Broomhall forced Australian telcos to roll back thousands of small cell 5G sites across Sydney. not reported in fake news MSM of course. get the deets here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p3Ip5U0ZWM

>three councils in uk
>wew
you know those are councils for cities or areas bigger than cities, right? what a retard

>obsessively combing through archives
seriously seek help shlomo, it's not healthy to lose arguments this severely on the reg

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:45:32 2019 No.10823377

>>10823363
>equating marginal results in one of the 9 groups of males to meaning cellphones cause cancer
>study doesn't show Kaplan-Meier survival curves like any normal medical paper would where survival is noted
honestly the study can just as easily be used to show that cellphone radiation actually increased the life span of rats.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:47:46 2019 No.10823381 >>10823377 >outright ignoring any evidence except clear >"it was only le males anyway xd upvotes please" >muh lifespan cringe/cm2 off the charts

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:48:27 2019 No.10823385 >>10823377 >cellphone radiation actually increased the life span of rats That's not a totally unexpected result, and not necessarily a good sign: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:48:57 2019 No.10823389 >>10823381 that's a great rebuttal, you must be head of the debate team.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:51:18 2019 No.10823396 >>10823385 ionizing radiation

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:52:55 2019 No.10823398 >>10823396 I wish I had your ability to read only keywords and ignore larger concepts. It must make life much easier.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:53:29 2019 No.10823401 how come anti-5G has all the science on their side? and pro-5G seems like a bunch of hired mental patients? beats me

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:55:22 2019 No.10823403 >>10823398 I get the concept, but it doesn't apply to non-ionizing radiation.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:56:25 2019 No.10823405 >>10823401 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:59:34 2019 No.10823411 >>10823405 "hired mental patients" was too vague for you?

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 20:59:45 2019 No.10823412

>>10823371
>not reported in fake news MSM of course. get the deets here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p3Ip5U0ZWM
>dude just trust me or watch this hour long video
No, provide timestamps and evidence or fuck off
>you know those are councils for cities or areas bigger than cities, right? what a retard
>Town councils in Frome and Glastonbury have voted to oppose the roll-outof 5G in their area,
>town councils
>Frome
>Glastonbury
>Glastonbury (/ˈɡlæstənb(ə)ri/)[2] is a town and civil parish in Somerset, England, situated at a dry point on the low-lying Somerset Levels, 23 miles (37 km) south of Bristol. The town, which is in the Mendip district, had a population of 8,932 in the 2011 census.[1]
It seems that you're the retard in this case. Towns with populations of less than 10,000 are not "cities", nor is a new one getting a moratorium "every week". Stop lying.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:00:58 2019 No.10823413 >>10823381 >xd upvotes please Again accusing others of being redditors while you yourself are one

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:01:59 2019 No.10823417

>>10822908
It's not nazis, it's mostly paid shills. There are some certain governments in the world which want to sink the US and entire Anglosphere population into the ocean of mutual hate, distrust and disdain. I don't want to get political, but I feel the need to beware you and others because this d&c shit is everywhere on the internet now. Anti-5G shilling, anti-vaxx hysteria, climate change denial, moon landing conspiracy theories, IQ and race threads – these are among the most effective disinformation strategies they use on /sci/. There are many of the same trolls on /his/, /g/, /lit/, /tv/ and, obviously, on /pol/.
It's such a shame that so many average citizens fall for it again and again and begin to spread these lies across the internet.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:04:46 2019 No.10823422 >>10823411 https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/health/health_services/mental_health/admission_to_a_psychiatric_hospital.html

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:06:33 2019 No.10823426 >>10823422 Good idea, some people might not know what a mental patient is.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:07:43 2019 No.10823428 >>10823237 The same libs you hate*

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:10:49 2019 No.10823441 >>10823426 wasn't trying to spread awareness, you're doing plenty for that. Just trying to help you get some help anon

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 21:12:45 2019 No.10823445 >>10823441 >no u

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:26:55 2019 No.10823609 In this world it's yeet or be yeeted, and OP has been thoroughly yaught https://pastebin.com/VuLYa82S

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:30:43 2019 No.10823621 >>10823352 >literally no sources on the website is this a joke?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:32:17 2019 No.10823622 >>10823371 What reason did he have? Maybe he’s just another cuckoo like you with more power.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:34:43 2019 No.10823626 >>10823385 Sometimes I take a jar, put it up my ass, and squeeze real hard until it shatters into thousands of pieces and then I bend forward and suck my own dick while bits of intestine, blood, and glass fall out of my prolapsed anus.

Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:38:49 2019 No.10823635

>>10823327
>>10823335
>>10823340
>>10823344
>>10823348
>>10823352
>>10823363
>>10823371
>>10823381
>>10823385
>>10823398
>>10823417
>>10823626
And a lot of the time when I get finished giving myself a little heady wedy I find my mommy and show her the glass and gut bits and say “mommy I feel good” and she cries and then I get put into the place where the good people go who do the same thing and I feel sad that I can’t put more jars in my butt

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:50:44 2019 No.10823668 File: 153 KB, 796x1008, MKULTRA Subproject 119, 1960.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10822820 Huh.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 22:53:48 2019 No.10823678 >>10822908 Nazis loved technology more than anyone else at the time.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 23:01:53 2019 No.10823702 >>10823678 So much that they alienated all their good physicists with autistic aryan physics

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 23:05:39 2019 No.10823709 >>10823332 >you're only allowed to distrust popular consensus on exactly one subject, preferably less

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 23:23:57 2019 No.10823770 File: 644 KB, 1494x1672, Foster_Bible_Pictures_0074-1_Offering_to_Molech.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823332 Clamped, vaccinated, circumcised. C L A M P E D L A M P E D VAXXED.... Circ'd. Nothing is wrong.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 23:29:55 2019 No.10823785 >>10823668 go back to /x/ with your hoaxes

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 23:32:22 2019 No.10823789 File: 87 KB, 500x712, 1544300108858.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823785

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 20 23:57:07 2019 No.10823836 >>10823789 not an argument

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 00:05:41 2019 No.10823856 File: 10 KB, 224x225, 1562133852402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10823836

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 00:06:08 2019 No.10823857 >>10823789 true

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 00:09:22 2019 No.10823865 >>10822862 >>10822868 /sci/ nerds BTFO

Anonymous Sun Jul 21 00:48:45 2019 No.10823937

>>10822820
Everybody knows they are being poisoned slowly by radiation. I'm not sure why you care so much. I've moved somewhere where there is no 5G. Or 4G. Or 3G. And the nearest neighbour is too far for me to see their wifi. Radiation is still raining down on me and not all of it is natural.

To live is to die slowly.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 04:44:23 2019 No.10824234 >>10823937 fuck off jew

Anonymous Sun Jul 21 07:27:54 2019 No.10824463

>>10822862
This graph show the devil side of statistics, the R^2 it's 0.4, a fucking bad level, but hey, p value it's so dam low! We have to believe it!
That distribution cannot be cleary explained by using a linear classifier.
What i'd do by looking the image it's trying to classify in polar coordinates.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 07:50:59 2019 No.10824492 >>10822820 >We microwaved rats and they died >Therefore you should believe in this anti new tech meme

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 08:43:35 2019 No.10824563 File: 217 KB, 1280x743, lllll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10822820 Mandatory

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 15:00:05 2019 No.10825438 >>10824492 shalom

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 15:02:28 2019 No.10825446 >>10824492 The irradiated ones actually outlived the unirradiated ones, which makes the study look poorly made and retarded.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 15:08:18 2019 No.10825457 >>10825446 you are poorly made and retarded

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math