Is 5G really dangerous?

File: 46 KB, 750x680, 1557803714641.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue May 14 01:22:59 2019 No.10642320 [Reply] [Original]

Is 5G really dangerous?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 01:30:16 2019 No.10642327 >>10642320 yeah those towers are pretty dangerous, you can fall off them or get electrocuted by the power source of the antennas. workplace safety is important.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 02:48:50 2019 No.10642417 is he installing that with a hose pipe?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 02:56:01 2019 No.10642423 >>10642417 He's spraying the chemtrails that will vaccinate Americans through 5G

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 03:00:01 2019 No.10642428 you tell me https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cell-tower-shut-down-some-california-parents-link-to-several-cases-of-childhood-cancer/

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 03:46:53 2019 No.10642492 He's waterblasting or painting and that's not a radiation suit. It's a disposable 3M plastic overalls. facebook trash

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 03:59:13 2019 No.10642516 >>10642492 this

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:12:39 2019 No.10642534 >>10642428 good to know that california parents are also oncologists and epidemiologists

Anonymous Tue May 14 04:22:53 2019 No.10642555
File: 143 KB, 650x785, pa-1238905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10642320
No, don't be silly. And neither is
>asbestos
>lead water pipes
>trans fats
>radium toys
>circumcision
>high fructose corn syrup
>coal dust
>vaccinations
>thalidomide
Besides even if it WERE harmful the costs would be far outweighed by the benefits.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:24:18 2019 No.10642560 >>10642320 the radiation isn't ionized, so no. it's about as dangerous as using a microwave from down the street

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:25:22 2019 No.10642561 >>10642555 are you pretending to be this retarded, anon?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:33:24 2019 No.10642568 >>10642327 Not an argument >>10642423 Not an argument >>10642428 Argument >>10642534 Not an argument >>10642555 Triple argument >>10642560 Not an argument >>10642561 Not an argument

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:34:49 2019 No.10642572 File: 51 KB, 413x243, 1533387818794.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642568 >not an argument

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:35:49 2019 No.10642575 >>10642572 Not an argument

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:36:14 2019 No.10642577 File: 79 KB, 519x717, my wife's son.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642568 >not an argument

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 04:37:22 2019 No.10642578 File: 148 KB, 988x1059, 1516004397439.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642575 >not an argument

Anonymous Tue May 14 05:10:10 2019 No.10642610
File: 21 KB, 401x401, waaaaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10642320
I hate how 5G might alter the behaviour of birds and pollinating insects, while still not being
>HERPDERP CANCER LOL
but it still affects them enough that they stop pollinating stuff we need for food production or otherwise fucks up the ecosystem

but the cancer-crowd like OP who when they are deciding upon whether to worry about 5G or not wants immediate chernobyl results, so the people who make decisions immediately lumps 5G-skepticism into the same box as antivaccination or antiroundearth.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 05:25:18 2019 No.10642635 >>10642320 It just fucking 70 GHz how is that dangerous?

Anonymous Tue May 14 05:33:55 2019 No.10642650

>>10642635
the radio waves mess with the neuro thought phase, and thus grow enormous tumors inside your brain.
Trust me, I work in telecommunications. I have all the inside info on the deadly effects of 5G, and even what the government doesn't want you to know about the dangers of fibre optic cabling

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 05:37:13 2019 No.10642655 >>10642577 Poor boy is going to have some real issues when he grows up.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 08:29:31 2019 No.10642821 >>10642492 disposable 3M plastic coveralls are what you use for radiation too, because you can't bring enough material with you to protect you from radiation so you just try to keep the dust out of your body and clothes

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 08:35:02 2019 No.10642828 Russian newspapers and trolls are pushing anti-5G agenda for some reason. Also anti-GM and whatnot. I guess russians think it corrodes westerners trust in their societies.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 08:36:56 2019 No.10642830 File: 50 KB, 550x543, 1519094652513.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642821 Are you literally too retarded to comprehend why those are not used for fucking em radiation

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 08:37:51 2019 No.10642832 >>10642655 No, he’ll be fine aside from the, uh, Minions.

Anonymous Tue May 14 08:46:19 2019 No.10642843

>>10642830
nothing you can wear can protect you from exploring in a hot zone, so you just keep the radioactive dust out of your clothes to limit your exposure
this isn't for low-energy EM like 5G and microwaving your baby and sun burns, this is for shit like nuclear fallout and reactor disasters
the fact that you even contest this shows your total lack of even basic knowledge on the subject

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 08:59:00 2019 No.10642865 >>10642610 OP is obviously a disinfo agent.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:14:25 2019 No.10642968 >>10642650 >Dangers of a wave in a dielectric Really gets my brain thunking. t. Radio engineer

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:26:04 2019 No.10642989 >>10642320 that image is the dumbest argument ever, he's stood right next to it for most of his day for weeks if not months, it'd be the same as saying you shouldn't get an xray because the xray tech wears protection

Anonymous Tue May 14 10:35:04 2019 No.10642998
File: 1.47 MB, 656x368, 1557691468943.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10642555
This but unironically. Our self-styled protectors in the FDC and other places have been leaning on their shovels since forever. Tobacco was "scientifically safe" for as long as that could be bought, and safe in public opinion for as long as that could be bought afterwards. The only government that even bothered questioning it was Nazi fucking Germany because they were the only ones who gave a shit. Fuck this dystopia and fuck the ruling classes' mindless, goal-less crapshoots with our health and our children's health. Nobody even needs 5G, it's the same as other cellphone service, just a bit faster for video streaming.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:36:09 2019 No.10643002 >>10642555 lost me at vaccines kill yourself

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:43:52 2019 No.10643012 >>10642998 Saying that 5g is just for steaming is quite ignorant. Most self driving cars are being developed with 5g in mind as it has the bandwidth required to transmit a bunch of sensor data

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:45:46 2019 No.10643016 File: 52 KB, 800x668, m_10234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643002

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:46:55 2019 No.10643019 >>10643012 what happens when some chink hacker decides to hack into 5G transmitters and aim a collimated microwave signal at your baby's brain

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:47:56 2019 No.10643021 >>10642989 the funny thing is mast technicians drop like flies from brain diseases and are chronically understaffed

Anonymous Tue May 14 10:48:02 2019 No.10643022
File: 91 KB, 449x960, 1557617930287.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10643012
>replaces your job
>spies on you
>crashes into you
>shoots lasers in your eyes
>bombards you with microwaves
>requires special microwave towers to be built
Truly the gift that keeps on giving. Thank you based Elon.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:48:45 2019 No.10643023 >>10643021 let me guess you don't have a source?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:49:03 2019 No.10643025 >>10642832 Don't talk shit bout minoms. But I agree onions is safe

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:50:51 2019 No.10643027 for all the retards ITT that guy is wearing a mesh suit that protects him from EM like in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bKcJegKfBo It's NOT A PLASTIC HAZMAT SUIT like the shills want you to believe, it's made of a METAL MESH

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:52:23 2019 No.10643029 >>10643023 I work in the industry and I'm suck of the lies and deceit

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:53:19 2019 No.10643032 >>10643029 so no source then it's boils down to >just trust me bro I know trust me

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:54:07 2019 No.10643034 the only real danger is from all the power lines because we'll need to put 5G towers every fucking hundred feet because their signal drop-off and penetration are absolute garbage

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 10:55:02 2019 No.10643035 >>10643032 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1027699/14-die-cancer-seven-years-living-phone-mast-highest-radiation-levels-UK.html

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:01:12 2019 No.10643043 >>10643035 that's people living near a mast, you (or he) said "mast technicians drop like flies from brain diseases "

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:03:32 2019 No.10643047 >>10643043 >lol dude people exposed to 1/1000th that a tech is are dying, the tech is fine are you dumb

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:04:13 2019 No.10643048 >>10643047 so you don't have a source to back up the claim then?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:05:01 2019 No.10643050 >>10643043 Really? Wtf I love harmful radiation now

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:05:12 2019 No.10643051 File: 8 KB, 246x205, ju.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643048 >source source, Im gonna need a source for that buddy nice source >sky is blue? source >grass is green? source >white people developed the modern world? source

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:07:46 2019 No.10643054 >>10643051 the 5G tranny is going to tell you to go back to pol now just watch

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:09:35 2019 No.10643055 >>10643051 >you're an npc if you don't blindly believe everything people on 4chan who claim to have insider information tell you shocking

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:11:35 2019 No.10643057 File: 1.01 MB, 995x1403, 876.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643055 wi-cancer.info thousands of citations to non-industry funded studies, all peer reviewed you can be human too anon, educate yourself

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:14:00 2019 No.10643059 >>10643057 alright sweet thanks for the source, I'll give it a read

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:14:13 2019 No.10643060

>>10643019
What happens is is that the antennas used for broadcast are low gain so you can't reconfigure them unless they are SFA which just allow for a slight adjustment for frequency and beamwidth. You can't turn an omnidirectional antenna into a pencil beam antenna

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:15:13 2019 No.10643062 >>10643060 5G is all about collimated (focused) beam signals, pay attention

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:16:16 2019 No.10643066 >but anon.. i warned you

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:17:19 2019 No.10643070 File: 214 KB, 1200x1200, 551D78EC-7998-4A5C-B507-439D01822DF3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643066 Forgot pic

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:21:20 2019 No.10643074 >>10643057 On the second figure the peak signal amplitude is at -100dB. That is tiny, which is to be expected at wireless. The light from your lightbulbs is higher frequency and has more energy content

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:23:20 2019 No.10643078 >>10643074 try reading the text portion of the article the MODULATION is what is now very damaging. pulsed and distorted EM radiation is far more deadly to cells than old school continuous wave

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:27:26 2019 No.10643083 >>10642577 >onions and wine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SiiRx7GDzI

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:29:41 2019 No.10643085

>>10643062
I do pay attention. You're confusing beamforming with collimation. At most wireless distances the waves can be approximated as a plane wave, this collimated. Beamforming is used to increase the SNR and thus the BER and the transmission rate of a zone when high traffic is detected. This is still negligible in comparison to the energy emitted by the sun and lightbulbs. If the government wanted to zap you with radiation, 5G is a really shitty method to do it with. Terahertz and higher would be much more efficient

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:31:51 2019 No.10643090 >>10642555 >high fructose corn syrup now that the dust has settled, what's the final say?

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:32:43 2019 No.10643092

>>10643085
5G masts and potentially even phones will use dielectric lens tech which do in fact collimate the signal

we've had incidents of people holding their phones at specific angles and the collimated beams going to and from the phone have exploded the battery

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:33:45 2019 No.10643093 >>10643085 >Terahertz and higher would be much more efficient How so? ThZ can't go through anything at all.

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:34:32 2019 No.10643095

>>10643090
it enters your metabolism at a slightly later entry point so it might result in different kinetics in your body. however, whatever metabolic effect you might get from it is vastly outweighed by the fact that it's an unnecessary calorie source present in basically every packaged food. if you replaced all the HFCS in packaged foods with table sugar we'd be getting just as fat.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:34:55 2019 No.10643096 File: 125 KB, 625x682, 1536991931274.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643085 >comparing the Sun's/lightbulb energy to microwaves INDUSTRY SHILL BEGONE

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:36:36 2019 No.10643102

>>10642428
>"The moms believe the recent increase in cancer cases could be caused by radiation from radio frequency, or RF, waves coming from a cell tower located on the elementary school campus."

well if mom says so...
Nonetheless, is there anyone looking into this? It could be a great opportunity to find out more about what causes cancer, especially since there are different cases meaning there could be relational causes

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:37:03 2019 No.10643103 File: 446 KB, 808x805, 53.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643092 >we've had incidents of people holding their phones at specific angles and the collimated beams going to and from the phone have exploded the battery Jesus Christ.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:37:51 2019 No.10643104 >>10643016 don't reproduce, nigger do you have any education in biology-related sciences? come on, drone, i'll wait

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:38:36 2019 No.10643107 >>10643104 I'm a neurosurgeon and I have two PhDs in biophysics

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:38:54 2019 No.10643109 >>10643104 also, youtube is not education you might need a reminder

>>	yid Tue May 14 11:39:38 2019 No.10643110 >>10643109 see >>10643107

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:39:55 2019 No.10643111 >>10643107 and i'm fucking your mother right now

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:40:43 2019 No.10643113 File: 1.27 MB, 3024x4032, 1499523701475.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >5G is perfectly safe goy- uh, consumers!

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:41:00 2019 No.10643114 >>10643107 why get 2 PhDs in same field u dum imma call you doctor doctor dum dum

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:43:45 2019 No.10643120

>>10643074
>the light from a lightbulb has more energy content
Wow cool anon. I guess I should throw out my microwave oven then, and just use a 200W light bulb to reheat my lasagna. It has all the same properties and does the same things, they're both non-ionizing after all

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:48:47 2019 No.10643129

>>10643102
my first question was whether there's any contaminated sites nearby potentially leaking into the groundwater. i'm not familiar with UK government agencies though and with ten minutes of googling i couldn't find any easy resources for finding lists or maps of contaminated land

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:49:36 2019 No.10643130 >>10643129 >N-NO IT'S NOT THE RADIATION IT'S SAFE IT'S FINE THOSE MOMS ARE ALL SCHIZOS lmfao

Anonymous Tue May 14 11:55:10 2019 No.10643147

>>10643130
that's not what i said at all. there's long histories of people in industrialized countries finding out their groundwater or the soil is SUPER contaminated only after a weird hotspot of cancer cases. look at, say, Love Canal. the information is public but not obvious. you have to go poking around for it to find out, say, that you've living for ten years on top of 20 thousand tons of chemical waste.

probably we're not looking at another Love Canal situation, but the precedent is there. and if we're considering a local cluster of cancer cases, what's the first thing you should ask? is it about whether there are proven hazards around you? or is it about the unproven hazard with unknown mechanism?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:55:11 2019 No.10643148 >>10643130 I think you missunderstood. Other anon is eliminating other possible causes to narrow it down, which is the logical thing to do rather than jump to conclusions

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:56:44 2019 No.10643152 >>10643147 >>10643148 just be calm guys no need to remove the uninsurable cell towers

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 11:58:33 2019 No.10643155 >>10643027 oh, that'd be because of the high voltages then? because it's not completely enclosed so it's not protecting him from EM

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:01:34 2019 No.10643159 >>10643155 >because it's not completely enclosed so it's not protecting him from EM wrong

>>	Totally not Pencil Tue May 14 12:07:25 2019 No.10643164 >>10642650 >Dangers of fibre optic cables Bitch it just shoots light

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:16:22 2019 No.10643178 >>10642610 >5G-skepticism into the same box as antivaccination or antiroundearth. As it should be

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:19:29 2019 No.10643186 >>10643057 >First chart is amplitude vs time >Second chart is a fourier transform Bonus points for the guy making a beginner tier mistake and using fftshift without knowing why or correcting the x axis Lmaoing @ ur life -t. EE

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:19:58 2019 No.10643187 >>10643178 >As it should be back up your assertion with logic and facts

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:20:36 2019 No.10643188 >>10643092 Just like Long Lines did seventy years ago?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:21:36 2019 No.10643189 >>10643187 You first.

Anonymous Tue May 14 12:26:25 2019 No.10643197
File: 89 KB, 452x428, d4481057.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I often wonder if we're damaging ourselves long term with the constant madmade radiation we're exposed to nowadays.
We have evolved to tolerate 8 hours of solar radiation and constant background radiation, and of course microwaves aren't ionizing, but the constant wi-fi must do something?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:29:56 2019 No.10643200 weed cures cancer

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:31:14 2019 No.10643205 >>10643186 if you were really smart you'd understand you can convert both graphs into either format you're 100 IQ tops champ

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:32:17 2019 No.10643209 >>10643205 No shit retard. My point is that the website is disingenuous word salad made to fool gullible morons.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:32:18 2019 No.10643210 >>10643189 People have every right to be concerned that radiation might cause cancer. It is on you to soundly and logically quell their fears. Let's go.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:33:49 2019 No.10643214 >>10643209 you can look at any of the citations and references for yourself big boy, it's all there for you to """debunk"""

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:34:48 2019 No.10643216 >>10643214 >Not even 100 posts in and already resorting to a gish gallop Sad!

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:36:30 2019 No.10643221 >>10643216 damn this has BTFO me now... i have just realized I was a crackpot schizo tin-foiler spouting woo off my meds... frickin EPIC debunk of me there based atheist

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:37:43 2019 No.10643222 >>10642428 This reminds me of the weeks of time and millions of dollars that were flushed down the drain because Concerned Mothers were certain that telephone lines caused leukemia

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:38:52 2019 No.10643227 >>10643221 If you wanted to be taken seriously you would use serious sources. If you post crazy bullshit outside of /x/, don't cry when people don't take it seriously.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:40:31 2019 No.10643229 >>10643222 telephone lines didnt shoot microwaves through the heads of toddlers >>10643227 tips fedora

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:42:18 2019 No.10643232 >>10643002 Really? Asbestos didn't raise a red flag? >burger bottomless stupidity

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:42:45 2019 No.10643233 >>10642320 yes

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:42:57 2019 No.10643234 >>10642828 5G is a key technological component to American economic growth.

Anonymous Tue May 14 12:44:56 2019 No.10643236

>>10643234
how? downloading a film a bit faster isnt going to help at all
>muh AI cars
is woo, AI was bullshit to begin with and always has been

the only effect 5G will have is massively increased rates of illness from the toxic electric smog blanketing the people from the masts

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:54:04 2019 No.10643257 >>10643012 That is a horrible fucking idea.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:56:23 2019 No.10643260 >>10642320 He's wearing the suit because standing right next it is dangerous.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:56:28 2019 No.10643261 >>10643236 It’s not about AI. It’s about raw data and moving it from you to a company/government agency. Interagency and intercorporate data volume is a big deal too. You think too small.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:56:43 2019 No.10643262 >>10643022 Elon doesn't give a fuck about 5G or LIDAR and actively ridicules people who do.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 12:59:05 2019 No.10643265 >>10643090 It's trash and should be avoided (so should sugar).

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:02:09 2019 No.10643270 >>10643095 >if you replaced all the HFCS in packaged foods with table sugar we'd be getting just as fat. True, except that sugar is more expensive and so such a replacement would result in a consumption decrease.

Anonymous Tue May 14 13:03:41 2019 No.10643274

the NTP has 3 studies out of 3 showing that exposure to a few watts of ye olde sub-1GHz GSM causes heart and brain cancers in rats, yet /sci/ still rejects the very idea that RF up to and including 5GHz can have deleterious effects on living cells. Why is /sci/ so anti-science?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:08:33 2019 No.10643279 >>10643274 it's not /sci/ it's the industry shills that are planted on /sci/ to astroturf and manufacture consensus on their death ray technology that kills your boomer parents first and sterilizes everyone

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:27:52 2019 No.10643312 File: 10 KB, 200x313, 0774CEF2-A775-441B-9011-B4E7D7203028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642320 > the 5g antennas are radiating during installation

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:30:30 2019 No.10643315 >>10642655 >growing up Probably not

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:32:43 2019 No.10643319 >>10643027 >dat CGI failing to track the motion of the heli guess they didn't wanna pay for a real camera.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:33:14 2019 No.10643320 >>10643319 it's real footage lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:35:11 2019 No.10643322 >>10643320 no, it isn't. on real footage the spots are always on the object. in this VFX footage the spots fail to stay on the objects, especially obvious if you look at the rotor blades.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:36:52 2019 No.10643324 >>10643322 so you've seen corona UV on rotor blades moving at speed before huh get a load of you big guy

Anonymous Tue May 14 13:50:25 2019 No.10643359
File: 68 KB, 1043x558, apparently UV goes through steel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10643324
bro, the corona of the rotor blades when seen from below literally shines through the helicopter (pic related). what's worse, at 2:14 the camera tilts up and the fucking dots move up with the camera rather than staying on the blades.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:52:35 2019 No.10643361 >>10643222 Yeah. It's totally normal for numerous children attending the same school to get cancer at the same time.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:57:13 2019 No.10643377 >>10642572 >>10642578 You really think that people will accept nonsense in place of actual arguments because of your shit-tier meming?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 13:59:11 2019 No.10643382 >>10642320 More importantly, is it necessary?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:02:01 2019 No.10643391 >>10643359 corona discharge is pretty weird i gotta agree

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:06:30 2019 No.10643403 it's clear from this thread that 5G is extremely dangerous, but the same must also go for 4G, 3G, 2G and so on, and all wireless routers I'm getting rid of mine now and going fully wired

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:13:34 2019 No.10643423 >>10643197 literally everything emits some type EM radiation.

Anonymous Tue May 14 14:21:00 2019 No.10643436

>>10642560
Have you seen the research articles done in the 80s about non ionizing radiation triggering the sodium ion channels to activate in neurons. Idk about you but i don't want my neurons misfiring
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551899/

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:22:01 2019 No.10643441 >>10643436 Whoops its actually calcium channels https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780531/

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:27:16 2019 No.10643454 >>10643210 >Zero replies I mean, if 5G is safe why can't you soundly and logically explain how it is safe?

Anonymous Tue May 14 14:33:42 2019 No.10643472

>>10643012
there is no need for 5g, there is also no need for self driving cars and having your vase in the living room connected to the internet, 4g with speeds reaching several hundred mbps is enough for pretty much anything except for uncompressed 8k streaming

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:35:11 2019 No.10643479 File: 236 KB, 914x527, Verizon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What did Verizon mean by this?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:38:02 2019 No.10643484 >>10643479 america: land of the jewish lawyers

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:39:38 2019 No.10643491 >>10642320 Are you stupid, or do you not see he's spraying something onto the tower? That's not a suit that would stop radiation. It stops whatever chemical that is from getting on him. This isn't /b/. Stupid humor is ... stupid.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:40:38 2019 No.10643495 File: 229 KB, 900x520, Vodafone.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643479 What did Vodafone mean by this?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:41:41 2019 No.10643498 File: 208 KB, 881x502, AT and T.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643495 What did AT&T mean by this >>10643491 It's a metal mesh suit you fucking retard shill

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:41:56 2019 No.10643500 >>10643479 It means NIMBY regressionists want to kill 5G

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:42:43 2019 No.10643502 File: 143 KB, 907x526, Microsoft.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643498 What did Microsoft mean by this?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:43:48 2019 No.10643507 File: 256 KB, 930x536, Nokia.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643502 What did Nokia mean by this?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:44:36 2019 No.10643509 File: 88 KB, 1080x1080, 58468412_2279828025605702_299371234044803305_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643498 >It's a metal mesh suit you fucking retard shill It isn't you trolling liar. And notice the misty cloud from the spray below.

Anonymous Tue May 14 14:44:38 2019 No.10643510

>>10643361
>there is probably something at the school causing cancer
Okay, I'm with you
>therefor it must be the very first thing I think of, without any evidence
and you lost me
the school probably has something way worse wrong with it than just a cell tower

Anonymous Tue May 14 14:47:40 2019 No.10643516
File: 232 KB, 892x522, American Tower Corp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10643507
What did American Tower Corporation mean by this?

>>10643509
It is literally a metal mesh suit, the "spray" is one of the fake leaves from the fake insult to nature.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:49:16 2019 No.10643520 >>10643510 >just a cell tower the areas around cell towers are colloquially termed "Cancer Alleys" in the industry kill yourself shill

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:49:19 2019 No.10643521 >>10643516 >the "spray" is one of the fake And there you have it. A conspiracy meme.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:50:19 2019 No.10643525 File: 52 KB, 671x473, 1506740039553.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643521 >And there you have it. A conspiracy meme. Why do underage redditors come to /sci/

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:53:53 2019 No.10643537 >>10643525 Not an argument.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 14:55:07 2019 No.10643541 File: 317 KB, 909x520, China Mobile.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What did China Mobile mean by this?

Anonymous Tue May 14 15:03:31 2019 No.10643566

I'm old. Until about the 2000s, I had never heard of autism. Granted, it was a newly classified version of "retarded," but still - the growth in the number of diagnoses was absurd - almost like it became a 'fad' to have an autistic child. ADHD is very similar in history.
Is it truly a coincidence, or is the introduction of wireless (cell phones, home wifi, cordless phones, ...) somehow connected?
On my vanpool was a fellow who was obviously a genius. He researched this with the nascent Internet tools that were available at the time, and found enough documentation to bring it forward to authorities. He was promptly told to go away.
I wonder.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:10:35 2019 No.10643579 >>10643566 >new technology is introduced >old people start blaming every random bad thing that happens which they don't immediately know the cause of on this new technology fucking boomers thinking everything causes autism

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:13:33 2019 No.10643590 >>10643579 Don't forget >Con artists reinforce their delusions and profit off of their stupidity

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:14:39 2019 No.10643593 >>10643454 Anything that goes against the conspiracy circlejerk is immediately thrown out. If you don't want to be compared to flat earthers, don't act identical to them.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:14:42 2019 No.10643594 >>10643566 >I'm old. Until about the 2000s, I had never heard of autism. lmao look at this neet boomer

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:14:46 2019 No.10643595 >>10643579 >start blaming I questioned. You're blaming.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:15:55 2019 No.10643598 File: 310 KB, 1046x1200, CtZ-YSFWAAAWGVo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642828 >muh russia Didn't work in 2015 and won't work now.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:18:16 2019 No.10643600 >>10643595 >hiding behind semantics when posting anonymously pathetic

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:19:12 2019 No.10643603 >>10643600 Pot. Kettle. Black.

Anonymous Tue May 14 15:20:06 2019 No.10643604

>>10643566
>Is it truly a coincidence, or is the introduction of wireless (cell phones, home wifi, cordless phones, ...) somehow connected?
I doubt there's any relation. more likely autistic people simply fit in much better in a society built on explicit rules. now that everything is relative and every job requires "soft skills" people expect you to found all your behavior on subtle cues suddenly mild autism is a serious illness that renders you unfit for most types of work. autism in the past meant "he's a bit weird and can't talk to girls but he loves to read and he loves rules - send him to college to become a priest" or "he's a bit weird but he really likes machines - he can be an engineer / wagon builder / plumber / clock maker". these cases would work out okay. then you had the cases where the insular talents / interests were ignored and the kid was deemed lazy and made to take over dad's business. those cases probably didn't work out so well.
point being, for the functional autists the diagnosis might be more curse than blessing. having that label gives them and others an excuse to not try too hard when something gives them trouble. oh well, I guess you can never learn this because of your autism. but for the truly dysfunctional ones it's probably a blessing since they would suffer a lot in the past and now they get retardbux.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:22:11 2019 No.10643612 >>10643604 I can buy that. Thanks.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:22:45 2019 No.10643613 File: 124 KB, 498x594, TKZi4EJ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642568 I think you just saying "not an argument" is silly as you don't use any facts to back up anything you're saying.

Anonymous Tue May 14 15:24:59 2019 No.10643616

>>10643604
>now that everything is relative and every job requires "soft skills" *AND* people expect you to found all your behavior on subtle cues suddenly mild autism is a serious illness that renders you unfit for most types of work.
fixed. two separate points, although they might be related.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:24:59 2019 No.10643617 >>10643613 not an argument

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:28:52 2019 No.10643631 >>10643613 anybody who spams the term "not an argument" is just a troll who's coming onto sci to kill time or a paranoid schizophrenic who can't cope with anybody disagreeing with them. Don't bother to engage with them seriously

Anonymous Tue May 14 15:29:34 2019 No.10643633
File: 164 KB, 403x518, adf982cfd0fcfd42b3b60072ccdd8603a1a9867fd34d2798f32381392b8244eb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10642320
>who would have thought that you have to wear insulation when working close to high powered device.

Gee I don't know, the power company maybe?

>>10642428
>yet one more thing added to the list that gives Californians "cancer".

Right next to dihydrogen oxide.

>>10643377

Yes they do. That's why they continue to do it. These are not logical people you're dealing with.

>>10643423
>EM
>Emission
No

>>10643454
Tell me what "5G" is and how it works.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:29:46 2019 No.10643635 >>10643631 Not an argument

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:38:40 2019 No.10643663 File: 634 KB, 1230x543, 1538852219518.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >5G uses collimated microwave signals >Apple soi cultists think this won't be used by Trump's CIA to exterminate them

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 15:42:11 2019 No.10643667 >>10642635 Your household microwave only uses 2.5GHz, so u know, low frequencies with high wattage can be just as bad as high frequencies at low power.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 16:01:56 2019 No.10643709 >>10642568 >>10642572 >>10642575 >>10642577 >>10642578 >>10643537 >>10643613 >>10643617 >>10643631 >>10643635 >Argument not

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 16:06:35 2019 No.10643721 File: 135 KB, 1256x1464, 1556210812494.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643709

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 16:40:30 2019 No.10643810 >>10643216 >fallacy fallacy Sad! Read the fucking citations if you have any science-mindedness in you at all, retard!

Anonymous Tue May 14 19:20:27 2019 No.10644187

>>10643633
>>>10643454 (You)
>Tell me what "5G" is and how it works.

Are you really going to try this bullshit? That's what I'm asking YOU. You're the one advocating for it and insulting anybody wary of it and yet it seems YOU are the one who doesn't even know what it is.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 19:36:58 2019 No.10644228 what an incredibly shit thread. This is the lowest quality thread I've seen on /sci/ in years

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 19:47:36 2019 No.10644252 >>10643593 How am I acting identical to them? You are generalizing.

Anonymous Tue May 14 19:58:37 2019 No.10644288

>>10642320
You want the truth? We dont have a fucking clue. Probably yes, but no study exists about the long term effects of 5G, it's too young of a technology. It will definitely further lower the male reproductive qualities however, but so does every older system, since you have your phone 16 hours a day 10 cm from your balls communicating nonstop with the base stations.
t. Actual EE who develops 5G systems

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 20:19:37 2019 No.10644344 >>10644288 Is there a solution to this? Even if I stop using my cellphone, the unwashed masses will continue using them regardless of what's been proven.

Anonymous Tue May 14 20:47:39 2019 No.10644407

>>10644344
Be a trend setter, not a trend follower. Keep your phone away from your body and if anybody asks why just calmly explain to them that until the technology has been more thoroughly researched for safety you are not comfortable keeping it any where near your person. For added effect and benefit to yourself, put the phone on speaker as often as possible to keep it away from your most precious of organs: your brain.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 20:48:31 2019 No.10644408 >>10642320 >work in industry dev >get to test 7G

Anonymous Tue May 14 20:53:50 2019 No.10644419

>>10642320
The reason everybody is talking about 5G
>Qualcomm has the CDMA patents that make 3G and 4G work
>everybody in the Telco industries HATES Qualcomm
>China tries to push 5G tech that doesnt need Qualcomm, goes in with Huawei and ZTE
>US tries the same with Intel
>Also the Koreans go with Samsung and the swedish with Ericsonn
>this is a big part in the Trade War that has been going on in the last years between USA, China and the EU, including the arrest of the daughter of Huawei CEO in Canada for (maybe) fake charges
>turns out Intel shits the project, and retires from the race, leaving the US naked
And this is why everybody tries to push the 5G tech, despite the latency issues and the power consumption issues that make necessary to rethink everything in how antennas work.

And it is very possible that 5G causes cancer in mice, https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/high-exposure-radiofrequency-radiation-linked-tumor-activity-male-rats

Although there are probably a thousand more things that you use daily that are a hundred times more likely to give you cancer.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 21:11:11 2019 No.10644442 >>10644344 Wear a farady cage around your junk

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 21:36:07 2019 No.10644483 >>10642428 EM at those wavelengths don't interact with tissue. posting what some idiots guessed causes cancer means nothing

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 21:46:30 2019 No.10644501 File: 23 KB, 480x480, 1469417923696.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10642568 Reddit: The Rebuttal

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 22:34:08 2019 No.10644571 >>10643070 a god damn hero

Anonymous Tue May 14 22:39:23 2019 No.10644575
File: 1.11 MB, 720x540, 1549388215190.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10644187
>You're the one advocating for it
No, lol.
>yet it seems YOU are the one who doesn't even know what it is.
Even if that were the case, that does not take away from the fact that people who claim it's dangerous don't even know how radio works. We've used it for literally over a hundred years now and nothing bad has happened save for idiots making retarded posts on the internet. If you're going to claim it's dangerous at least know how it fucking works.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 22:57:31 2019 No.10644600 >>10643479 >>10643495 >>10643498 >>10643502 >>10643507 >>10643516 >>10643541 >May face litigation >Actual or perceived health risks >Alleged adverse health effects >If those risks are substantiated >... You really suck at reading.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 23:06:18 2019 No.10644612 >>10642320 >Is 5G really dangerous? No, as long as everyone adopts it we will have herd immunity. science and stuff

Anonymous Tue May 14 23:16:00 2019 No.10644624

>>10643090
Last I check fructose was a natural sugar humans bodies use, historically around 5~15% mostly from diverse fruits that also had other things you needed that were eaten over the course of a day.
So switching to a 80%+ pure fructose intake derived only from corn that is significant part of a single sitting meal intake >is just a more advanced way to get more what your body needs faster, thanks to advancements in science.
>More energy is ALWAYS better, be it high fructose corn syrup or 5G. I mean a little bit is good so how can we go wrong with more, more, more?!

>>	Anonymous Tue May 14 23:16:01 2019 No.10644625 >>10644288 >We don’t have a fucking clue >Probably yes Mentally ill schizo retard

Anonymous Tue May 14 23:51:32 2019 No.10644684

>>10644419
Taken from that article:
“The levels and duration of exposure to RFR were much greater than what people experience with even the highest level of cell phone use, and exposed the rodents’ whole bodies. So, these findings should not be directly extrapolated to human cell phone usage,” said John Bucher, Ph.D., NTP senior scientist.

So nothing to do with 5G

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 00:07:27 2019 No.10644709 >>10642568 I like how we dont even need flags to know who's american

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 00:31:23 2019 No.10644753 >>10644684 Citing an authority while rejecting the conclusions of that authority is a common trend among conspiracy theorists.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 05:00:19 2019 No.10645098 >>10644419 >Straps rat up to 240V mains >Rat dies >Batteries also make electricity >Batteries must be dangerous to people and should be banned

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 06:13:25 2019 No.10645165 >>10643262 holy shit based Elon, got a source for that?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 06:22:38 2019 No.10645178 >>10644600 all those companies are uninsurable on this issue, mongoloid

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 06:23:40 2019 No.10645182 >>10644483 >EM at those wavelengths don't interact with tissue. ladies and gentlemen, an actual 60 IQ on /sci/

Anonymous Wed May 15 06:27:01 2019 No.10645189

>>10643057
>none of the 5G tranny industry shills have looked at this image or website and """debunked""" it epic fedora style

hmm wonder why, is it because the overwhelming majority of published science that's not paid for by the industry is telling us that non-ionising radiation is actually extremely dangerous?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 07:49:30 2019 No.10645282 All wireless internet should be abolished so we can return to the golden age of before the iphone

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 12:58:15 2019 No.10645858 >>10643057 Jesus that website is worrying

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 13:38:05 2019 No.10645942 >>10642320 why is he installing it on a palm tree?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 13:39:53 2019 No.10645948 >>10642320 Why isn't the tree wilted

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 13:40:46 2019 No.10645952 >>10645942 >>10645948 it's not a real tree stupid

Anonymous Wed May 15 13:56:54 2019 No.10645981

>>10643057
While this is of little concern seeing as it is still non ionizing, you can however see some disturbing phenomena around areas where wavelengths make a clashing interface against one another. In these areas of high energy "pressure" the air can actually ionize enough to damage tissue. Also, a study hasn't been done on the effects of non-ionizing energy on already ionized particles. Beyond that, you are pulling at straws.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 14:01:27 2019 No.10645989 >>10645981 >still believing the "non-ionizing is completely harmless" propaganda you're hopeless

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 14:10:32 2019 No.10646002 >>10642555 Benefits? How could mass-producing 5g antennas benefit us common pleb? 4k porn? This belongs to a nuclear centre, an observatory or the LHC. I dont want to cook my internal organs just for some shit ass Wi-Fi juicer or high quality hentai

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 17:43:42 2019 No.10646397 >>10643113 kek

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 18:58:35 2019 No.10646572 >>10643120 You could definitely cook lasagna with a lightbulb with the same wattage as a microwave.

Anonymous Wed May 15 19:28:56 2019 No.10646645

>>10644483
That fag posted an article which is not related to 5g... but it is interesting to note that 5g does interact with tissue, specifically it penetrates about ~400 microns and heats it up.

In fact the military weaponized that part of the spectrum in the 80's, apparently it feels like being lit on fire.

but obviously they were using intensities well outside the output maximum of these towers.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 19:30:44 2019 No.10646648 >>10646572 My sister had an easy bake oven and after waiting an hour for a shitty partially cooked cake it was never used again

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 20:30:29 2019 No.10646758 >>10643120 Even the shittiest microwave is 600-700 watts.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 21:26:27 2019 No.10646893 >>10643096 em spectrum all the same

Anonymous Wed May 15 21:34:51 2019 No.10646913

>>10646645
>but obviously they were using intensities well outside the output maximum of these towers.

What makes this obvious?

It's obvious by the fact they burnt 100s of millions of years of Earths oil in 5 decades that they want to turn this planet into an oven and send all the souls to baal for yet another burnt offering.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 15 21:44:26 2019 No.10646940 >>10646913 You can literally just do the physics calculation of how much power is delivered at a distance from the cell towers. It can only heat you by the barest tiny amount unless you're right next to one.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 01:21:46 2019 No.10647458 >>10642830 his parents always use them for radiation, what's your problem?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 01:22:49 2019 No.10647465 >>10643164 It's unnatural light

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 01:26:55 2019 No.10647475 >>10643205 Yeah, but by transforming you loose the relation of amplitude(t), which is essential to the point of 5g being more dangerous because the wave (change in amplitude) is more complex

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 02:05:14 2019 No.10647522 >>10642577 glasses at that age? wtf

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 02:10:40 2019 No.10647525 >>10642320 can the non trolly fags, answer me well, I thought cell towers and cellphones in general were linked to increases in cancer, testicular in men, as well as brain effects, as well as nodes around the ears

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 02:12:19 2019 No.10647526 >>10647522 u jelly brainlet

Anonymous Thu May 16 10:33:37 2019 No.10648257

>>10647525
At high powers then yes, radio burn is a thing. But the /x/ tier retards of this thread fail to realise that in a receiver system you design for extremely low power because that's what we get. At high power broadcast towers there is a fence around them to keep people out of the dangerous areas. In a residential cell tower the power at the base of the cell tower will do nothing to you.

Anonymous Thu May 16 12:00:24 2019 No.10648452

>>10642320
Brainlets stop.

Would you use a glove if you had to touch a lit lights bulb? Yes. Do you need a glove to protect you from the light bulb when you're more than some centimeters away? No.

This is the fucking same. Radiation when you're that close to an antenna is orders of magnitude stronger that when you're meters away from the antenna.

Go back to your brainlet containment boards.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 15:08:55 2019 No.10648838 File: 88 KB, 768x752, 51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10646893 >em spectrum all the same

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 15:10:19 2019 No.10648842 >>10648257 all tests the regulations are based on are covering the thermal effects of 6 minutes of exposure retard

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 17:55:44 2019 No.10649259 I never knew HAZMAT SUITS PROTECT YOU FROM RADIATION FUCKING DUMBASS

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:12:31 2019 No.10649299 >>10649259 it's a metal mesh suit, read the thread

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 01:20:59 2019 No.10650473 >>10643107 Get a refund on them degrees m8 you got robbed.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 01:28:53 2019 No.10650494 >>10649299 It's plastic overalls to keep him from getting wet. He's very clearly cleaning them with a pressure washer

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 01:44:27 2019 No.10650520 >>10649299 Lying with dubs. That's a 4Chan sin!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 08:21:01 2019 No.10651114 >>10650494 >>10650520 it's a metal mesh suit lmao, stay mad industry shills

Anonymous Fri May 17 09:58:08 2019 No.10651288

>>10642428
>>10646645
There's actually quite a few articles detailing the highly increased chance of cancers linked to EMR from basic radio and cell towers.
You also need to take in the discrepancy between other towers and 5G. Mainly the ability to penetrate any material. 5G has a much harder time penetrating structures and as a result will need a larger amount of power to make that work for the civilian population to use on their cellphones while taking a shit.
Another interesting thing is if you check many of the dates on those studies and go back about six months and check news articles you'll find large amounts of news sources talking about how there isn't any harmful links found between radio and cell towers.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 10:11:33 2019 No.10651307 >>10644709 I'm greek

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 13:21:28 2019 No.10651747 >>10651114 That tinfoil resonator on your head finally cooked your brain

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 15:19:27 2019 No.10652032 >>10645989 >he doesn't microwave himself to keep warm

Anonymous Fri May 17 16:11:56 2019 No.10652176

>>10643057
That website is some Alex Jones conspiracy shit.
>Source [1]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [2]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [3]
Suggests preliminary, inconclusive evidence which is blown out of proportions.
>Source [4]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [5]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [6]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [7]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [8]
Irrelevant for the topic
>Source [9]
Definitely worth a read although some of the referenced articles are using outdated data.
>Source [10]
Also fine.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 16:36:27 2019 No.10652251 >>10642320 >itt: schizos off their meds babble about how 5g is killing us and is part of a wider conspiracy to control us

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 18:52:38 2019 No.10652639 >>10643232 Asbestos is gud?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 18:54:20 2019 No.10652648 >>10643107 Plase explain vaccines to an idiot like me dr

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 18:56:42 2019 No.10652653 >>10647465 Doesn't pollution cause worldwide unnatural light?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 18:58:57 2019 No.10652658 >>10651288 Can you link one or two for reading purposes

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:06:40 2019 No.10652670 >>10642320 If 5G was at all dangerous then how would the elite safeguard themselves from it?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:07:40 2019 No.10652676 >>10642423 checked based and /thread

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:47:11 2019 No.10652746 >>10642843 >being this much of a brainlet You're not even worth the retarded wojak.

Anonymous Fri May 17 20:50:57 2019 No.10652896 [DELETED]

>>10651114
>>10649299
>>10648838
>>10647465
>>10646913
>>10645989
>>10645189
>>10645178
>>10644419
>>10644407
>>10644252
>>10644187
>>10643810
>>10643709
>>10643663
>>10643617
>>10643598
>>10643595
>>10643454
>>10643566
>>10643541
>>10643525
>>10643520
>>10643516
>>10643507
>>10643502
>>10643498
>>10643495
>>10643479
>>10643436
>>10643441
>>10643361
>>10643279
>>10643274
>>10643233
>>10643229
>>10643221
>>10643214
>>10643210
>>10643205
>>10643187
>>10643152
>>10643130
>>10643113
>>10643107
>>10643096
>>10643078
>>10643057
>>10643054
>>10643051
>>10643047
>>10643035
>>10643029
>>10643027
>>10643021
>>10643019
>>10643016
>>10642998
>>10642650
>>10642568
>>10642555
>>10642428
Unironically take your meds and don't have sex.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 21:03:12 2019 No.10652932 File: 410 KB, 900x676, 1557954404745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Please explain to me how 5G could be dangerous. You're delusional.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 21:30:28 2019 No.10652981 >>10642320 grounding suit? like the guys hanging off helicopters working on power lines? that's dif. not a haz-mat suit.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 22:12:45 2019 No.10653057 File: 97 KB, 1280x720, MARK STEELE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >massive uptick in butthurt 5G discord tranny shills after /ourlad/ MARK STEELE won in court today SEETHING

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 22:32:07 2019 No.10653095 >>10652176 this post is a telecoms industry shill FUD damage control

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 22:34:49 2019 No.10653101 File: 128 KB, 960x960, 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10651747 >Heh, just epicly debunked yet another schizo 5Gphobe. >He was probably a racist nazi too. >Fuck I love science! Tip tip tip m'sir

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 23:22:07 2019 No.10653166 >>10652896 not >>10653057 an >>10653101 argument

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:05:56 2019 No.10653468 >>10642568 >how to get guaranteed (You)s: the post

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 06:34:47 2019 No.10653817 >>10642320 If we fake news this enough cali will not have any 5g and also probably europe since they'll ban anything.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 07:03:44 2019 No.10653849 >>10653817 microwaves are harmful

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 18:08:04 2019 No.10655056 File: 117 KB, 611x598, 1558126265525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643002 >he fell for the vaccine jew

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 18:26:57 2019 No.10655089 >>10643090 no worse than sugar, although sugar is bad.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 18:29:22 2019 No.10655094 Did they say 4g was harmful 3g harmful color tv was harmful tv was harmful radio was harmful. like fuck u gotta have some harm to live nigga.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 18:39:20 2019 No.10655119 File: 31 KB, 485x443, 1545355916777.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10655094 >bro its fine to shoot yourself in the face with a .50 caliber desert eagle because i squirted your nose with this water gun

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 19:33:00 2019 No.10655225 >>10642423 >10642423 >23

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 22:41:23 2019 No.10655542 >>10642320 Yes, 5G will allow to control mind by using HF waves of light.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 00:12:01 2019 No.10655731 >>10646572 no you couldnt

Anonymous Sun May 19 01:44:12 2019 No.10655923

>>10652981
Whatever he is spraying out doesn't look very high pressure, which suggests to me that the cloud is steam and they're using boiling water to clean it.
Steam is very hot. So is boiling water. If I am right about what he is spraying then the suit is simply to keep it from contacting his skin and getting burns.

The people crying wolf about 5G haven't a fucking clue about radiation and why a hazmat suit would do nothing to reduce the dangers they claim 5G imposes.

Anonymous Sun May 19 07:02:43 2019 No.10656346

>>10655923
he's not spraying anything industry shill, that's a fake leaf that looks like something being sprayed at an angle

he is wearing a metal mesh suit to protect himself from the dangerous microwaves that will cook him at that distance from the antennas

everyone in range of that mast is being cooked in exactly the same way, just over a long period of time

interestingly, microwave power regulations and research do not take into account 24/7 longitudinal exposure to pule-modulated microwave frequencies, which is exactly where the damage comes from

Anonymous Sun May 19 07:28:03 2019 No.10656372
File: 94 KB, 965x636, 1556308910327.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10652932
>Humans, animals and other living forms in an ecosystem live normally with waves patterns that don't change for hundreds of millions of years
>We progressively introduct stronger and stronger waves emitters everywhere in our environment

1) Why would they be safe in the first place ?
2) Shouldn't we establish well the fact that they are safe BEFORE exposing a large part of humanity (+ ecosystems) to them ?
3) What are the benefits of 5G anyway ? 4G is well enough for 98% of use cases. You can simply install 5G in the 2% of use cases like big companies and that's it.

If you are not sure if it s dangerous but you are sure it will be almost not beneficial to people what's the point forcing it ?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 07:35:49 2019 No.10656383 Friendly reminder, /sci/ is full of russian paid trollposters overflowing from /pol/ This thread is prime example

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 07:41:37 2019 No.10656397 File: 162 KB, 1160x629, hahaha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10656383 hilarious

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 09:52:24 2019 No.10656524 File: 3.11 MB, 2420x1430, 1558267156031.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10656372 So you have no answer. Despicable. Really. To spread disinformation at a time like this...

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 09:55:18 2019 No.10656529 >>10643051 Looks like someone lost the debate & can't back up their claims... (because they are made up?)

Anonymous Sun May 19 09:57:34 2019 No.10656534

>>10656529
do you really think an industry that "war-games" the data and regulations on whether microwaves cause cancer are going to make public statements about their mast technicians having massively higher rates of brain tumors?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoI5sJaVGi4

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 10:12:16 2019 No.10656557 >>10656534 >RT oh great, more 2016 Russki bullshit

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 10:13:13 2019 No.10656560 >>10656557 >muh russian hackers wasnt Mueller and, by proxy, the entire American left just massively humiliated and proven fraudulent on this exact topic

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 10:16:17 2019 No.10656565 How is this thread still up? Just stop responding to the schizo.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 10:16:49 2019 No.10656566 >>10656565 >gets btfo by a schizo sad!

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 10:44:14 2019 No.10656622 >>10643107 Source?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 11:38:42 2019 No.10656713 >>10656560 Not really, no.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 11:39:48 2019 No.10656714 File: 781 KB, 722x848, 5235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10656713 cope

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 13:42:52 2019 No.10656888 >>10643002 vaccines work, the people giving them out are bad. whats so fucking hard to understand?

>>	Sage Sun May 19 13:44:44 2019 No.10656891 >>10656346 >Imagine being this retarded So where are the burns on his face?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 13:45:15 2019 No.10656895 >>10642650 >>10643667 Actually, low frequency at higher power is way worse. as the frequency goes up, the penetration depth decreases, which means less power can affect, in our concern, biological tissue.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 13:53:09 2019 No.10656915 >>10652932 it could be dangerous because we know there are em waves that hurt us, why couldnt these other ones do the same?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 14:13:36 2019 No.10656952 >>10642320 Very dangerous. It's used for illuminati mind controlling beams.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 14:15:07 2019 No.10656956 File: 120 KB, 960x1003, FB_IMG_1558289655276.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] It's fine as long as it's not at 440hz

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 22:55:46 2019 No.10658086 >>10642320 >took five generations of rats exposed to EMV To make the population infertile >testosterone levels in males dropping every year I'm sure there is no problem here.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 19 22:58:10 2019 No.10658090 >>10658086 EMW*

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 03:09:15 2019 No.10658439 >>10647465 Bait

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 05:46:08 2019 No.10658604 >>10644419 Finally some true facts that are true

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 12:51:48 2019 No.10659178 >>10658604 shill

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 12:55:02 2019 No.10659186 >>10642428 nigger if something managed to spread cancer that fast it wouldn't have passed regulation at all AND we'd have people going around with cancer guns

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 12:55:58 2019 No.10659188 >>10659186 >we'd have people going around with cancer guns Kek

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 13:06:07 2019 No.10659221 >>10659186 >nigger if something managed to spread cancer that fast it wouldn't have passed regulation at all LOL the industry fired and blackmails any scientist that shows microwaves cause cancer

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 16:44:17 2019 No.10659749 >>10656956 Wait, that’s the frequency I use to tune my instrument oh god oh fuck

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 16:48:10 2019 No.10659765 >>10642555 There's nothing wrong with circumcision and you literally can't prove me wrong.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 16:53:06 2019 No.10659780 >>10659749 in fact music causes cancer

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 17:00:43 2019 No.10659801 File: 1 KB, 23x585, 1530578018183.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10659765

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 17:48:20 2019 No.10659897 >>10643035 >dailymail Yep, that’s gonna be a yikes from me dog.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 17:57:10 2019 No.10659918 >>10642423 Retarded bullshit but I hoose to believe it.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 17:58:13 2019 No.10659925 >>10642555 >that smug look I'll take whatever that little fuck is having.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 18:12:47 2019 No.10659959 >>10643120 heat is heat. we use microwaves to cook shit because, unlike visible or infrared light, it can be reflected by a metal mesh. so you can keep all the energy focused on the ramen and not have to insulate you oven with 10cm of asbestos

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 18:19:54 2019 No.10659984 >>10643361 one school is not a pattern

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 18:37:26 2019 No.10660014 >>10642320 You dumb fuck, he is wearing a hazmat suit because he is cleaning the tower.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 18:52:42 2019 No.10660052 >>10660014 it's a metal mesh suit that protects from the massive levels of EMR what you think is a stream of liquid is a leaf angled in a way that catches the light

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 19:50:38 2019 No.10660164 >>10660052 >it's a metal mesh suit that protects from the massive levels of EMR No it isn't.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 19:51:35 2019 No.10660166 >>10660164 yes it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bKcJegKfBo why are you assuming the person in OP taking the picture would know that that is a hazmat suit?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 20 20:50:40 2019 No.10660279 >>10660166 All you science illiterate idiots don't realize that if 5g is bad for you than you would be feeling negative health effects from the 4g LTE in place right now. t. EE who's taken signal processing and electromagnetism

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 05:54:18 2019 No.10661049 >>10660279 Who says we are not?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 06:47:40 2019 No.10661106 File: 117 KB, 320x263, 1497183453178.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10660279 >All these science illiterate birds nesting on the floor because of the microwave antennas know nothing https://vimeo.com/337084922

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 06:48:41 2019 No.10661107 >>10642320 Yes

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 10:38:30 2019 No.10661367 Why would a corporation purposefully harm its consumers

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 11:00:11 2019 No.10661402 File: 182 KB, 986x555, 705_pio_ferry_gull_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10661106 Sealgulls are nesting on the ground.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 11:06:18 2019 No.10661409 >>10642555 >sneaking vaccinations in there ebin

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 11:22:16 2019 No.10661428 >>10642568 based and americanpilled

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 13:15:05 2019 No.10661579 >>10661428 >>10653468 >>10644709 >>10644501 >>10643709 >>10642572 >>10642577 >>10642578 >>10643635 >>10653166 Based and (you) pilled

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 13:19:32 2019 No.10661586 >>10642655 You'd be surprised, weak men create hard times. Hard times create strong men...

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 13:35:45 2019 No.10661610 >>10643019 t. Does not understand what "collimated" means.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 13:37:26 2019 No.10661613 File: 155 KB, 570x489, trash fixed copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10643035 >dailymail

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 13:40:46 2019 No.10661623 >>10643197 >but the constant wi-fi must do something? Must? Why?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 16:07:46 2019 No.10661953 >>10642320 No. Stop shitting up /sci/ with obvious yes/no answer threads.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 16:10:42 2019 No.10661961 >>10642428 >A bunch of retards screech loud enough that a company had to acquiesce to their demands, even though the company did nothing wrong. Why am I supposed to be impressed by this?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 16:55:04 2019 No.10662064 >>10655731 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmUmc7BgBIc That's 200W it hits 460F in like a minute multiply that by 5

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 17:38:17 2019 No.10662149 File: 26 KB, 474x571, 1558391558404-b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] You are all brainlets

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 22:34:28 2019 No.10662660 >>10661610 t. provides no argument and is wrong to boot

>>	Anonymous Tue May 21 22:35:46 2019 No.10662664 >>10661402 zoom out and see a giant antenna on the roof of some church

>>	Anonymous Wed May 22 00:54:11 2019 No.10662854 >>10643319 they would have just not done a very good job of overlaying the footage from the special camera onto the actual footage. its probably not CGI. sound effects were retarded and ruined it tho.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 22 12:35:45 2019 No.10663758 >>10642555 >trips Confirmed.

Anonymous Wed May 22 13:19:05 2019 No.10663852

>>10656895
>as the frequency goes up, the penetration depth decreases

Wait, hold on. The graph I uploaded shows the penetration depth for photons of given energies for water, which I'll assume for now is a semi-decent model for a generic piece of biological tissue (I could be wrong, I don't do medical physics at all). Here, you can see that as photon energy increases (And thus the frequency increases), the penetration depth generally also increases. So really, as the frequency goes up, the penetration depth is actually also increasing. That disagrees with you saying that as frequency increases, penetration depth decreases. Where are you getting that information?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 22 13:20:22 2019 No.10663857 File: 36 KB, 800x650, 800px-Attenuation.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10663852 Fuck, I forgot to upload the picture.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math