[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 2.20 MB, 3000x3000, as17-134-20382.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134206 No.10134206 [Reply] [Original]

we went to the fucking moon

>> No.10134208

Get fucked commies and chinks

>> No.10134210
File: 1.74 MB, 3045x3072, as16-113-18282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134210

>> No.10134214
File: 1.53 MB, 3072x3070, as16-120-19187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134214

>> No.10134218
File: 3.65 MB, 5173x8110, s69-39815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134218

>>10134208
based

>> No.10134223
File: 942 KB, 3947x1553, s71-17122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134223

>> No.10134228
File: 3.01 MB, 4685x3624, s69-17487.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134228

>> No.10134267

>>10134206
No, we didn't

>> No.10134270

>>10134267
yes, we did, fucklord. there are mirrors on the moon that we've bounced lasers off of

>> No.10134289

>>10134270
Those are just rocks my dude

>> No.10134292

>>10134289
no they aren't. you can't specularly reflect a laser off a rock. it needs to be a specially-prepared mirror that humans (or at least a very advanced probe) put there

>> No.10134305

>>10134270
The presence of lunar retroreflectors is IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to verify. You don't have a 2m telescope or terrawatt lasers.

Most importantly - they were able to bounce lasers off the moon before the Apollo program even existed. See "Optical Echoes on the Moon", 1962 Nature v194.

>> No.10134325

>>10134305
if anyone would have wanted to disprove the moon landings, it would have been the soviet scientists. but the soviet scientists confirmed the lunar ranging experiments using mirror arrays on the lunar surface.

even the harshest critics of the moon landing had to give in. you're just an >>>/x/ tier idiot who refuses to believe science because "muh conspiracy theories!!!"

>> No.10134332

>>10134325
You are a simpleminded faggot who cannot read. I didn't deny the moon landings. I pointed out that the "mirrors" are not proof because 1. no individual has the means to verify they are there AND 2. lasers were bounced off the moon in 1962 - long before any lunar mission.

See "Optical Echoes on the Moon" in Nature vol 194, 1962.

Learn to read, moron.

>> No.10134339

>>10134332
fine, whatever, i assumed you were a "moon landing is a hoax" idiot.

but now i'm not clear what you're arguing. surely the mirrors were important? even the hubble space telescope does not have sufficient resolution for accurate distance measurements, so the mirror arrays that apollo left on the moon must improve the accuracy of the measurements made that use them, right?

even if the answer is no, and even despite the fact that unmanned missions could have put mirror arrays there much more cheaply, i still think it was badass we did it

>> No.10134450
File: 225 KB, 1280x800, Divine WHYbermancy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134450

>mfw reading the apollo 1 report

>> No.10134599

>>10134332
The laser reflections were vastly weaker prior to placing the reflectors.

>> No.10134885

>>10134206

Can you name every CSM and LM? I can.
Can you name every person by-crew-position? I can.
Did you know that every Apollo mission commander, with the exception of Alan Shepard, was a Gemini veteran?

>> No.10134935
File: 129 KB, 1377x779, Apollo 11 Press Conference.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134935

>>10134206
Yea these guys landed on the moon. Look how happy and accomplished they look afterward.
>>10134339

>> No.10134969

>>10134935
Remember that feeling you get when your mom forces you to take out the trash once every 4 months and you have to stop playing videogames for a couple of minutes? thats called being tired

now imagine, training 30 years of your life non stop for a 3 day mission which involves basically little to no sleep for a couple of days in which you have to perform a trillion intellectual and physical tasks PERFECTLY or else youll die HORRIBLY....

theye were just tired you retard

>> No.10134988

>>10134969

Better yet, they were obviously delighted in the IMMEDIATE aftermath, when they're in the cool quarantine-bus and talking to the god-damn president and he's hitting them over the head with how absolutely and objectively god-damn incredible what they've just done really is, for all human beings everywhere. Humans will naturally come down from any high. Further, these guys were trained to be cool, and not pussies, back during peak American culture. The same runs through baseball culture: take your knock and don't whine or stand out, as opposed to homosexual and European nigger culture in the guise of soccer and basketball: flop ridiculously, try to "sell" the flop/foul/injury etc. The Apollo landings occurred at peak American baseball-ethic culture, at its zero-derivative point due to hippies and so on.

>> No.10134990
File: 197 KB, 1024x1024, a true depiction of historical events that actually happened.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10134990

>>10134988

pic related.

>> No.10135016
File: 106 KB, 1024x693, 1540093909768.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135016

>>10134990
Pic related

>> No.10135040

>>10134206
Yes, I recall.

>> No.10135055

>>10134332

go kys retard

orig

>> No.10135089

>>10134599
Source: your ass.
I provided the science journal, year and
volume #. What do you have besides feeble excuses?
>>10135055
>t. Low-IQ science fanboy faggot.

>> No.10135095

>>10134332
So you do not deny the moon landing?

>> No.10135103

>>10134206
Those are figurines.

>> No.10135154

Lunar laser ranging (LLR) experiments are insufficient proof that man-made mirrors are on the Moon.

99% of /sci/ fags believe LLR relies on the presense of man-made mirrors (actually corner cube arrays) being present on the Moon.
In actuallity such mirrors are not needed because laser light was successfully and repeatedly reflected off the lunar surface in 1962 ("Optical Echoes from the Moon" Nature 194, 1267, 1962) before there had been any Moon missions.
/sci/ fags response:
>conspiracy theorist!
>kys!
Why so defensive?

>> No.10135160
File: 274 KB, 2421x3307, Screenshot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135160

>>10135154

>> No.10135163

>>10134332
Yes.... Don't care about the different albedo of the moon surface and a mirror.... That's also part of the conspiracy.

>> No.10135183

>>10134935
>why is it so loud here
>tfw gravity
>I wish I was out collecting rocks
>my bones hurt

>> No.10135267

Apollo 17
7 December 1972
Saturn V
NASA
Manned orbiter/lander/rover
Successful
Last manned Moon landing

>> No.10135274

>>10134206
in that tin foil box? i dont think so tim.

>> No.10135276

>>10134206
This crazy conspiracy again

>> No.10135288

>>10134208
This I never understood. USA was beat to every point in space race before the moon landing, yet you appear to think you were the winners somehow.
I guess it's the typical USA! USA! mindset combined with blatant cherry picking and worth assigning of events that "prove" your superiority.

>> No.10135329

>>10134935
Why you always use shitty argument like these were it would be first thing for conspiracy to avoid when using actors and stuff for publicity.
But you see ridiciously complex conspiracy who act like saturday morning cartoon villains who leaves clues for children to pick up.

>> No.10135332

>>10135288
If it had actually happened America would have repeated it

>> No.10135333

>>10135288
cope harder, faggot
USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

>> No.10135339
File: 110 KB, 790x444, 559579d9c4618884548b45b8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135339

>>10135288
>his commie country doesnt even exist anymore
>we beat you in everything except for going to the moon, which we gave up on
>look at our space shuttle, it's so unique

>> No.10135352

>>10135339
Is there any reason why it was never repeated and why Elon musk instead says colonize mars instead of the moon?
Why is everyone ignoring the moon?

>> No.10135359

>>10135352
>Why is everyone ignoring the moon?
Because it's a fucking useless desert. Same with mars technically, Musk is a retard.

>> No.10135365

>>10135288
>This I never understood. USA was beat to every point in space race before the moon landing, yet you appear to think you were the winners somehow.

The USSR's space program was a gigantic money pit that relied on literally forcing their only good rocket designer to work at gunpoint and did not create any meaningful scientific advancement despite having 3-4x the funding that NASA has ever had.

>> No.10135368
File: 1.26 MB, 1540x670, cross.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135368

Someone please explain the purpose to these equally spaced crosshairs you see in space photography.

>> No.10135374

>>10134208
Russia literally owns the usa and has put it's puppet as president lmao get fucked

>> No.10135404

>>10135368
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9seau_plate

>> No.10135421

>>10135332

There were six Moon landing missions.

>> No.10135466

>>10135352
Musk recognizes a colony on another planet is currently unfeasible. SpaceX specializes in rockets and getting shit into space (not moon bases). If you paid any attention you would know Musk is planning on a moon visit before going to Mars. He already has a jap funding a moon trip.

>> No.10135469

>>10135466
Why do people believe this shit?

It costs literally hundreds of billions to do a simple manned mission to the moon.

What colonies, what bases, what the fuck are you people smoking?

>> No.10135474

>>10135469
>It costs literally hundreds of billions to do a simple manned mission to the moon.
Goyim you can't do it!! Too expensive!! You must let government do it. Increase taxes to fund israel, I mean your space program

>> No.10135477

everybody else vs. USA
everybody else BTFO ETERNALLY
HOW WILL THEY EVER EVER RECOVER
https://youtu.be/N_lCmBvYMRs

>> No.10135481

>>10135339
Nibba the energia buran was superior in every aspects to the space shuttle and it didn't kill 14 astronauts. It's such a shame that the collapse of the Soviet Union cut funding for this beauty...

>> No.10135482

>>10134206
I'm over it [math]desu[/math]

>> No.10135487

>>10135368
I would guess it's to track image distortion

>> No.10135490

>>10135481
>superior
Again that meme. It was cheap badly made clone based on stolen and intentionally leaked designs, that nearly fell apart after its first flight following RCS failures and tile damage and God knows what else. Realizing how bad it was it got abandoned until the superior in every aspect hangar fell down on it.

Soviet technology is amazing.

>> No.10135495

>>10135374
Enjoy your krokodile withdrawals aleksi

>> No.10135498

>>10134206 >>10134210
>>10134214 >>10134218
>>10134223 >>10134228
Back when men were men.

>>10134267
These days, sadly...

>> No.10135503

>>10135490
>that nearly fell apart after its first flight following RCS failures and tile damage
Sauce on this?

>> No.10135507

>>10134935
>accomplished
So you are launched on top of 111 metres of metal loaded with high explosive fuel, riding a pillar of fire at many times the speed of sound
So you cross about 400,000 km through space to land on the Moon, beyond the hope of rescue of anything were to go wrong with the 1960's generation tech.
So you detach a landing craft the size of a cookie box and about as flimsy and land it among boulders where one mistake leaves you no hope of return
So you complete the mission, ride the top part of the lander cookie box into lunar space and dock with the command module and do an insane docking and transfer that has your training has never come close to in realism
So you return 400,000 km and enter the atmosphere at a velocity that makes the heat shield ablate and ionizes the air so you lose all radio communication.
So you splash don at sea, hoping to be rescued before the craft is flooded (happened once), and is heli lifted to a carrier.

And then you are placed in front of the press.
Of course you are bored!

>> No.10135520

>>10135503
There is a large, 40+ pages, thread dedicated to it on nsf containing variety of interesting information and links. Buried somewhere there is where I read of the issues afflicting it as well as possible explanations.

>> No.10135525
File: 340 KB, 1280x544, reeeeeeeeeee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135525

We went to the fucking LV-426.

>> No.10135727

>>10135498
Why wasn't it repeated

>> No.10135735

>>10135727
>>10135421

>> No.10135746

>>10135267
>Apollo 17 7 December 1972 Saturn V NASA Manned orbiter/lander/rover Successful Last manned Moon landing

why have they not been back?

>> No.10135753

>>10135746
Because it's a conspiracy. That's what you want to hear, right?

>> No.10135783

>>10135753
Buzz admits they didn't go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JO_ARVtspI

>> No.10135824

>>10135421
Not in the last decade.

>> No.10135826
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, Kane,_Dallas_and_Lambert_discover_Pliot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135826

I mean come on, it would've been less tedious to actually go to LV-426 than to build this in a studio or something.

>> No.10135843
File: 628 KB, 1280x720, Fishy.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135843

>> No.10135855

If it was actually possible Russia would have done it already. They have better rockets and even nasa buys their engines.

Funny how they didn't all these years...

>> No.10135865

>>10135855
Yeah, why didn't they go???? So weird lolol
Just asking questions btw xDDDDDDD

>> No.10135868

>>10135865
because it's tremendously expensive and russia isn't loaded

>> No.10135871

>>10134935
>dude why aren't they more lively after traveling 500000 miles to the moon and back in a tin can lol

>> No.10135876

>>10134218
Moonbased

>> No.10135879

>>10135871
Neil's been dropping hints for years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEXsB9oi7J0

>> No.10135907

>>10135783
>>10135879
back to >>>/x/

>> No.10135914
File: 67 KB, 542x459, image029[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135914

>>10135907
NO.

>> No.10135955

>>10134208
Based and epicpilled

>> No.10135956

>>10135103
Moonfags BTFO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=691hvpk_Vwc

>> No.10135968

>>10135783
>specifically cut without context, adding even this anoying slowmo repeat

>> No.10135977

The moon wasn’t real before but we made it real so that we could land on it.

>> No.10135983
File: 65 KB, 640x494, complot-lune-640x494[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10135983

>>10135968
This is what mooncucks actually believe.

>> No.10135984

>>10135879
He said oposite what your imply, you guys are genuinely mentally retarder if you can't undertand what other people saying.

>> No.10135991

>>10135753
>Because it's a conspiracy. That's what you want to hear, right?

no? and how dare you?

is there a cycle I am unware of , that you and those like you function solely on presumption as much as tabloids do? seemingly forever?

>> No.10135995

>>10135991
You seem mad. Stop writing like a retard and people will take you seriously.

>> No.10135996

>>10135753

what if I asked if you'd like to be shot in the face every time u ask a simple question?

>> No.10135999

moon conspiracy theories are the most pathetic cope for butthurt losers.

>> No.10136004

>>10135995

excuse me? I asked why they haven't been back.

it was insinuated that i must want to hear about them never going.

that - and your words - are retarded.

>> No.10136005

>>10135984
Sure kid. Watch from 10:05, he's dropping more hints: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3h1V3nzn0A

>> No.10136009

>>10136005
>t. incredibly retarded

>> No.10136010

>>10135995

people like you, utterly gutless in the real world, pathetic and bullish online

it's as if u think this toxic parade u spew is a new routine?

how long have u been neanderthalic?

>> No.10136011

>>10136010
welcome to 4chan newfag

>> No.10136012

by the way that video with the kid means nothing.

i took it ot mean they didnt go back after that because of money

apparently its expensive

>> No.10136015

>>10136011

yes 4chan, arrests for cyberbullying up on the list on Wikipedia

would u like to be fucking next? 'retard'?

>> No.10136016

>>10136009
>t. Deluded moon-autist

>> No.10136019

>>10136010
Anon, your keyboard seems to be missing the shift key, please get that fixed. Also, it's 'you', not 'u'. And maybe do something about your blood pressure.

>> No.10136020

>>10135746
The last mission was the first and only mission with a scientist on board\, a geologist (selenologist). The project was terminated by Nixon, he had a need to divert money and attention somewhere new, like not Watergate.

>> No.10136021

we cant communicate very well unless we're baiting people and calling them names

wow much impressive?

>> No.10136022

>>10136012
Buzz slipped up in his old age and told the truth, then tried to bring it back with some nonsensical rambling.

>> No.10136023

>>10136019

oh darling what a lovely erection of strut you perform for me

I cant wait for you to pay my bills today and be my boss forever

beat your chest one more time babe

>> No.10136024

>>10135824

...and?

>> No.10136027

>>10136020
>The project was terminated by Nixon, he had a need to divert money and attention somewhere new

thank you, this is interesting

>> No.10136028

>>10136023
Nice brainlet rage. You're actually more annoying than the conspiracytards. Congratulations.

>> No.10136029

>>10136028

oh grand poo bah preach to me from the heights

what a magical wonder you beseech to me this night

>> No.10136041

>>10135855
>They have better rockets
Like the N1?

>> No.10136044

recap?
>ask why they didn't go back
>get told I want to hear about some spooky
>get told i'm retarded
>get told i'm the brainlet raging while these twist are foaming at the mouth with every response
>projectionists who cant stand existence unless they're pushing someone else down

pathetic and i'm not surprised u get arrested for cyber bullying

expect more of it.

>> No.10136050

>>10136044
Stop shitposting. Nobody cares.

>> No.10136060

>>10136050

arrests for cyberbullying. I wasn't shitposting either I asked a question. people like you are the reason school shooters exist and are generally successful at it. you grind away at people until they break then cry with your dick out for all the victims too stupid to see you were part of the reason.

oh quick. alert the FBI for pointing out a fact.

>> No.10136064

>>10134206
I love watching /sci/ fight itself on the internet

>> No.10136066

>>10135288
You win races by crossing the finish line first. It doesn’t matter if you aren’t in the lead until the last few seconds.

>> No.10136078
File: 435 KB, 250x250, Moon.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136078

>>10134208
fpbp, luna is USA territory

>> No.10136080

Does /sci/ have no mods? There's been way more schizoposting the past few days and it's getting obnoxious.

>> No.10136082

>>10136080

yeah where are they? the cyberbullying is out of control.

>> No.10136086

>>10135753
>Because it's a conspiracy. That's what you want to hear, right?

sane answer to simple question: Nixon pulled the plug to spend money elsewhere - possible reason

>> No.10136089

>>10136086
Ok, I apologize for thinking that you were a retarded schizo. You're just a retard. Happy now?

>> No.10136095

now tell me who's schizo when objective discussion is not even on the table for some of you who can only bait and personally ad hominem people to feel like u can actually stand up.

and to think youtube is full of people who make conspiracy videos based on zero logic while cyberbullies crap themselves in the face of bigger men.

>> No.10136098

>>10136095
If you're going to plug your ears and cry about cyberbullies then fuck off back to social media where that kind of behavior is expected.

>> No.10136099

>>10136089

in real life my big brother would punch u in the face for being too obnoxious to deserve your intake of oxygen. bet u wont be there for that showdown. is that why u only do it online?

>> No.10136103

>>10136098
>that kind of behavior

yours is neanderthalic but u still manage to stand on two feet and con people into thinking ur one level up from that.

>> No.10136105

>>10136099
Lol, hiding behind your big brother. What a bitch.
But to stay on topic, here's a video for the schizos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

>> No.10136109

>>10136103
ok retard

>> No.10136115

>>10136105
>What a bitch.

u missed the bitch who jabbed at me first, retard. pity ur such cowards u cant even apologise.

go drag ur knuckles in someone else's face if u cant function without beating your chest like a rabid dog all the time.

by the way, would u like to be arrested for cyberbullying?

>> No.10136118

>>10135843
sped up footage looks weird

ergo conspiracy

>> No.10136119

>>10136115

oh wait. u HIDE behind ur computer, little bitch. are u scared of my big brother?

>> No.10136126

>>10136086
>sane answer to simple question: Nixon pulled the plug to spend money elsewhere - possible reason

sane answer from sane person, not the psychos who cant converse without jerking off.

>> No.10136135
File: 603 KB, 1700x1360, space1540697939200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136135

shit dang bois, can you believe we went to the MOON in this PIECE OF SHIT MADE OF CURTAIN POLES, PAPER AND TIN FOIL??????????????

>> No.10136148
File: 69 KB, 1248x701, ohreally.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136148

>>10136105
No high speed cameras in 1969? LIAR WHORE LIAR WHORE AND YOU KNOW IT!

>In 1950 Morton Sultanoff, an engineer for the U.S. Army at Aberdeen Proving ground, invented a super high-speed camera that took frames at one-millionth of a second, and was fast enough to record the shock wave of a small explosion.[20] High Speed digital cameras have been used to study how mines dropped from the air will deploy in near-shore regions,[21] including development of various weapon systems. In 2005 high speed digital cameras with 4 megapixel resolution, recording at 1500 fps, were replacing the 35mm and 70mm high speed film cameras used on tracking mounts on test ranges that capture ballistic intercepts.

>> No.10136152

>>10136135
Looks ridiculous.

>> No.10136160

>>10136135

can u believe sarcasm isn't an argument?

>> No.10136165

>>10136148
Not a film camera, faglord

>> No.10136176
File: 173 KB, 1700x650, spaceLunar-Module.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136176

>>10136152
we don't believe in optimization round these parts

>> No.10136183
File: 593 KB, 2080x1482, spaceA18_engines1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136183

if it doesn't fit what i've learned to expect by watching hollywood movies, it's fake

if it fits that mental image too much, it's fake

>> No.10136192
File: 230 KB, 1024x768, space26037740255_fd27fa4023_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136192

an unmanned lander put retroreflectors there. humans couldn't go to the moon, because i don't understand radiation.

>> No.10136198

>>10136165
This is what they used mooncuck: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ydgDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA158&dq=1954+Popular+Mechanics+January&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WSfYT4GmKcOA2wW3ycWOCw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true

Notice how they use a projector to display the video - the Apollo 11 video was projected onto a wall and then filmed by the TV cameras and broadcast that way.

>> No.10136203

>>10136198
lol

>> No.10136206
File: 2.51 MB, 3512x3545, spaceApollo_Guidance_Computer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136206

why weren't they scared of moving? movies taught me that getting a small tear in your spacesuit causes people to EXPLODE. are they stupid? fake.

>> No.10136207

>>10136206
>movies taught me

>> No.10136219
File: 2.32 MB, 2369x3000, spacepic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136219

did you know that NASA (which is hebrew for "deceive") spent so much on writing 140,000 lines of FAKE verifiably working guidance software that they ran out of money to shoot a convincing HOAX landing? they had to make the lander out of cardboard tubes because of it!

https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/

>> No.10136229

>>10135914
>I don't know how shadows work.
Good for you.

>> No.10136234

I know, I know. It's all faked, yadda yadda.
Gods, you guys are boring.
But here's a site where you can see photos of the Apollo sites from orbit, taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. I know... faked too. This is for when you grow out of your faglord diapers.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html

>> No.10136238

>>10136229
Enlighten us how shadows should work on the moon brainlet.

>> No.10136243
File: 233 KB, 400x266, ParallelLines.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136243

>>10136238
How about if you just go off and educate yourself before being a brainturd on a science forum?

>> No.10136247

>>10136238
Just like they do on earth. Maybe leave your basement once in a while

>> No.10136251

>>10136234
bam, hoaxfags BTFO

>> No.10136252

>>10136234
They've gotten better imagery from subsequent orbits:
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

>> No.10136254

>>10136234
Nice CGI, bro. Also, LRO doesn't even exist.

>> No.10136255

>>10136243
Thanks brainlet - can you show where the shadows are converging here? >>10135914

>> No.10136257

>>10136254
It can't, in your made-up universe.
Cognitive dissonance.
And I get that you're just trolling.

>> No.10136258

>>10136252
Utterly pathetic.

>> No.10136259

>>10136255
the vanishing point to the left of the image

the spastication of this crowd is astonishing

>> No.10136261

>>10136255
Dame principle, brainturd. Except the vanishing point is the Sun, to the left. And we know you know - you're just trolling cause you think you're cute. Juvenile humor. How droll.

>> No.10136265
File: 35 KB, 554x415, Hurr durr flat earth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136265

>>10136238

>> No.10136266

>>10136261
*Same principle.

>> No.10136278

>>10136259
>>10136261
Incredibly embarrassing that you think perspective would cause such an effect from such a close range.

>> No.10136282

>>10136278
faggot

>> No.10136285

>>10136265
That's a local sun brainlet. If those light rays were actually parallel then perspective would not cause them to converge as sharply as that.

>> No.10136291

>>10136285
you don't understand optics

also parallel lines never converge

>> No.10136292

>>10136282
Have another wet dream about the moon landings you lunar autist.

>> No.10136295

>>10136291
>also parallel lines never converge
So you disagree with this autist's picture? >>10136243

>> No.10136331

>>10136285
>That's a local sun brainlet.
Sure it is.

>> No.10136336 [DELETED] 

These are the same type of insults and abused science faggotry that we see in flat Earth threads. How is it possible that so many bright posters are actually responding to this jer>>10136285
>brainlet.
>>10136292
>lunar autist

>> No.10136337

These are the same type of insults and abused science faggotry that we see in flat Earth threads. How is it possible that so many bright posters are actually responding to this jerk?

>>10136285
>brainlet.
>>10136292
>lunar autist

>> No.10136345

>>10136331
It's obvious brainlet. Only a schizo would think it's 93 million miles away.

>> No.10136348

>>10136345
You're totally right and everyone here believes and supports you.

>> No.10136357

>>10136348
Finally, some sincerity.

>> No.10136362

>>10136357
Yes now look across the water and Ill tell you about the farm and the rabbits.

>> No.10136364

>>10136337
>t. Lunar autist high on moon dust and CGI

>> No.10136368

>>10136337
And they'll keep responding, because scientists are autistic and can't help but react to stupid.

>> No.10136373

>>10136362
There's no water to look across in my basement.

>> No.10136380

>>10136373
Shhhh just open up a picture on your computer of a tranquil lake or something and we can talk about the rabbits.

>> No.10136395
File: 1.50 MB, 1800x700, moon.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136395

>>10136380
Watch this and relax. It's real, we landed on this.

>> No.10136404

Glad those conspiratards are smarter than all of the USSR engineers and found out the truth

>> No.10136409 [DELETED] 

>moon landing thread
>flat earthers and /x/ faggots comes out of their caves
Like clockwork.

>> No.10136412

>moon landing thread
>flat earthers and /x/ faggots come out of their caves
Like clockwork.

>> No.10136437

>>10135332
>If it had actually happened America would have repeated it
>>10135824
Six landings is repeating it, retard.

>> No.10136440

>>10135914
This retard has never been outside.

>> No.10136444

>>10136004
There were SIX landings, retard.

>> No.10136445
File: 531 KB, 369x576, Sergei Krikalev.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136445

>>10136078

>> No.10136450

>>10135339

Braun was better in every way.

Also i wouldn't dick wave the Russians since we need their rockets to get into space now.

>> No.10136462

https://savageplane.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/the-occult-roots-of-nasa-and-the-ongoing-fraud/

>> No.10136489

>>10136462
rofl
back to >>>/x/

>> No.10136491
File: 363 KB, 1200x1011, T_Murphy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136491

>>10135163
Retard. Look at the information in >>10135160
1962 - no Moon missions and they were already able to detect reflected laser light from the Moon.

I dare you to do the math - calculate the photon flux at the laser and the fraction that is reflected back and detected at the receiver. Compare to any later experiment that assumes the presence of the corner cube prism arrays on the Moon. The only improvements they've made are due to using shorter pulses of light from higher powered lasers. Again - calculate the photon flux in each pulse, compare detection rate to 1962.

You won't like the answer at all, but the numbers don't lie.

>> No.10136513

>>10136489
NASA is >>>/x/

>> No.10136524
File: 255 KB, 1164x1068, huge_improvement.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136524

>>10136491
i found a paper that did the math. 10,000x increase in photon rate, pic related

>> No.10136538

>>10136524
Lasers got better.

>> No.10136549

>>10136538
sorry bro you lose
https://youtu.be/VmVxSFnjYCA
they checked it against just the lunar surface vs. the retroreflector. no signal from lunar surface but strong signal from retroreflector.

i'm not saying it's impossible to do lunar ranging off the surface (instead of a reflector) but! clearly there are retroreflectors left by apollo and the russian probes.

>> No.10136563

>>10136234
>gods
faggot autist detected

>> No.10136569
File: 41 KB, 641x530, 568346949.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136569

>black people
>invent a variety of different sticks and rocks over the last 100,000 years

>white people
>in the span of 60 years we go from the first powered flight (3 feet above the ground), to landing a fucking spacecraft on the surface of another celestial body

>> No.10136574

>>10136569
>>>/pol/

>> No.10136576

>>10134206
I was once high as shit in a party, started gazing at the moon and cried because of the realization humans actually went to the fucking moon.

>> No.10136578

>>10136576
i get patriotic as fuck for america when i think of the moon landing, and i am not even american.

must have been so insane to watch that shit live on TV in the 60s.

>> No.10136582

>>10134969
It was an 8-day mission. I don't imagine anyone got much sleep.

>> No.10136589

>>10136012
>apparently its expensive
The cost of space travel is astronomical.

>> No.10136610

>>10136589
I think space travel is much more expensive than astronomy.

>> No.10136638

>>10135843
It's almost like moving in a bulky suit on a world with substantially lower gravity than the world you've spent your entire life on is a little difficult. Notice how easily he hops to his feet straight from his knees near the end? Try that on our planet.
Unless this is just meant to be a fun little video of an astronaut eating shit on the moon. In which case: holy hell I wish that was me.

>> No.10136642

>>10135365
>The USSR's space program was a gigantic money pit
>forcing their only good rocket designer to work at gunpoint and did not create any meaningful scientific advancement
>Korolev
>working at gunpoint
OK tard, source this.

>despite having 3-4x the funding that NASA has ever had.
also source of this.
AFAIU, the US govt spent a shitload of money in the program, even more than in social programs:
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/feb/01/nasa-budgets-us-spending-space-travel
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/welfare_spending
I doubt the russians even spent a half of that. from http://www.historyshotsinfoart.com/space/backstory.cfm :
>The US space effort had more funding than the Soviet space program. NASA spent about $23 billion dollars on manned programs from 1961 through the first lunar landing in July 1969 (Mercury: $.4 billion; Gemini: $1.3 billion; and Apollo: $21.3 billion). Estimates for the Soviet manned programs range from $4.8 billion to $10.1 billion or less than 50% of NASA's budget.

stop spreading bullshit, faggot. the soviets managed to do a lot more than the US did at the time, they just lost a single race, and won many others. hell, the russians today are still have some tech that is more advanced than the US counterparts.

>> No.10136754

>>10136005
OMG you probably listen to anything astronaunt say and hear claims and confirmation about "fake space".
You really need psychiatrical help.

>> No.10136819

I will now name all major manned Apollo craft and astronauts by crew position, from memory. All rows will be of the form:

Mission Number: CSM-LM-CDR-CMP-LMP

1: (Apollo 1, unflown)-(none)-Gus Grissom-Ed White-Roger Chaffee
7: Apollo 7-(none)-Wally Schirra-Donn Eisele-Walter Cunningham
8: Apollo 8-(none)-Frank Borman-Jim Lovell-Bill Anders
9: Gumdrop-Spider-Jim McDivitt-David Scott-Rusty Schweickart
10: Charlie Brown-Snoopy-Tom Stafford-John Young-Gene Cernan
11: Columbia-Eagle-Neil Armstrong-Mike Collins-Buzz Aldrin
12: Yankee Clipper-Intrepid-Pete Conrad-Dick Gordon-Alan Bean
13: Odyssey-Aquarius-Jim Lovell-Jack Swigert-Fred Haise
14: Kitty Hawk-Antares-Alan Shepard-Stu Roosa-Edgar Mitchell
15: Endeavor-Falcon-David Scott-Alfred Worden-Jim Irwin
16: Casper-Orion-John Young-Ken Mattingly-Charlie Duke
17: America-Challenger-Gene Cernan-Ron Evans-Harrison Schmitt

Hm, how did I do?

>> No.10136958

>>10135016
HBO fund this

>> No.10137027
File: 72 KB, 630x472, orig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10137027

>>10136135
Sure, actually building vehicles to keep humans alive once they into space isn't particularly difficult, submarines are far harder due to the stupendous pressure differentials they have to deal with. A spaceship only has to be sturdy enough to deal with a 1ATM pressure difference between it's inside and it's outside, and only well shielded enough to protect it's occupants from short periods of Van Allen exposure for the Earth-Moon run so long as solar flares are kept track of. These things aren't fucking safe though by any means, a good micrometeor impact or large solar flare could have killed off any of the crews who flew in them and those people knew it. The disbelief you express however is on the same level as looking at a model T car and saying "OH WOW HAHA HOLY SHIT YOU WANT ME TO BELIEVE PEOPLE ACTUALLY DRIVE MILES AND MILES IN THIS PIECE OF SHIT? HAHA!"

Well yes, yes they did and your incredulity does exactly nothing to effect reality.

>> No.10137087 [DELETED] 

>>10137027
picture is TOTALLY CGI. model t's don't exist. all cgi

>> No.10137123

>>10137027
This baby was a straight up PANTIE DROPPER from day one.
A model T guaranteed your dick would get sucked SAME DAY.

>> No.10137218

>>10135507
Spoken like a true worthless piece of shit who has never experienced being pushed to the limits of mental and physical endurance.

>> No.10137423

>>10135183
kek

>> No.10137459

>>10136819
>snoopy never landed on the moon
>enterprise never flew in space
why does nasa insist on naming their missions after the scientific payload or gayreek names?

>> No.10137551

>>10136135
That looks pretty sturdy actually

>> No.10137555

>>10134206
>we
Don't include yourself, you virgin basement dweller, pony fucker

>> No.10137558

>>10137555
So, when did you go to the moon?

>> No.10137569

>>10134206
Incredibly wasteful project from a begone era.
It's ugly to see how much effort was wasted on that at a time of great social turmoil and rampant inequality and racism as well as the monstrous war in Vietnam.

>> No.10137586

>>10136066
>loses race
>draws new finish line

>> No.10137603

>>10137569
Nice bait retard

>> No.10137668

>>10137569
desu i fap to peoples suffering