/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9976892]

well?

[Anonymous No.9976893]

>>9976892
what the fuck is a quart? is that some kind of eternal anglo unit?

[Anonymous No.9976896]

>>9976893
doesn't matter

[Anonymous No.9976899]

>>9976896
maybe a quart is to heavy and i cant lift the buckets to push the water around

[Anonymous No.9976907]

>>9976899
you are on the moon

[Anonymous No.9976915]

>>9976892
Let Kurisu answer that question for you!

[Anonymous No.9976918]

>>9976892
e + (p - e) = p is full

p - e = e is full

[Anonymous No.9976958]

>>9976918
?

[Anonymous No.9976961]

>>9976918
You forgot it's stored in the balls.

[Anonymous No.9977433]

>>9976893
quart = quarter gallon

[Anonymous No.9977464]

>>9976892
how do you do it

fill pi bucket, pour into e, remainder is pi - e
put in e bucket, fill pi bucket, pour into e, remainder is pi - (e - (pi - e)) = 2pi - 2e\
then what idk

[Anonymous No.9977473]

>>9977464
>fill pi bucket, pour into e
Now you have a full e bucket and pi-e water on the ground

[Anonymous No.9977477]

>>9977473
noo silly i stop pouring when it's full

[Anonymous No.9977622]

>>9976892
about tree fiddy

[Anonymous No.9978109]

>>9977433
how much is that in frog bladders?

[Anonymous No.9978202]

>>9976892
57e-49\pi is within 0.99 and 1.11, I don't know if thats the fewest possible number of transfers. I just rearranged the inequality and looked for an integer pair of solutions on the plot.

[namefaggerino No.9978277]

>>9976892
>How many transfers of water will it take you to get water in one container that is within 1% of a quart?
Depends if you mean the water is within 1% of a quart or the container is within 1% of a quart. The latter problem is impossible, so I'll take the prior.
The answer to the prior is: one, if I'm careful enough.
I'll show myself out

[Anonymous No.9979017]

>>9976961
Based, redpilled, and great job buddy you're doing great.

[Anonymous No.9979235]

>>9976892
this insists that [math]\pi[/math] and [math]e[/math] can "exist" in a physical sense through fluid, yet their irrationally makes this problematic. Flawed question, I refuse to answer.

[Anonymous No.9979244]

6 쇼퍼홀릭이

[Anonymous No.9979481]

>>9979235
its also not possible

[Anonymous No.9979501]

>>9978109
see : >>9977622

[Anonymous No.9981080]

>>9979235
>>9979481
it is possible, there is an algebraic solution

[Anonymous No.9982825]

>>9976892
210 transfers

[Anonymous No.9982884]

you can't do it unless you have a third bucket

[Anonymous No.9983398]

>>9976892
I'll just fill it up the pie one cause pie sounds cooler with about 1% of a quart, so 1 transfer.

[Anonymous No.9983676]

>>9976892
I got 1.00059012149511 quarts in 312 steps. Don't ask how.

[Anonymous No.9983732]

>>9983676
Scratch that, dynamic programming works
209 steps to 1.00402

Where:
>1 is fill bucket of size pi
>2 is fill bucket of size e
>3 is dump bucket of size pi
>4 is dump bucket of size e
>5 is dump bucket e into bucket pi
>6 is dump bucket pi into bucket e

Path is [2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 2, 5]
It takes a minimum of 209 steps to get to (3.141592653589793, 1.0040241962657075)

Source: https://pastebin.com/dyyswgaf

[Anonymous No.9984011]

>>9979481
>>9983732
>>9981080
I must have been really fucking sleep deprived when I tried this because its the same approach I did just by hand and I kept ending up at earlier states no matter what. I was writing things down like 2e-pi rather than decimals so I probably just confused my retarded ass into thinking it was the same as something before.

[Anonymous No.9984037]

so, there's no way to do this right?

[Anonymous No.9984331]

>>9983732
those are actually 210 steps (that's the length of your list)

so I was correct >>9982825
yay

I also used dynamic programming btw

[Anonymous No.9984490]

>start doing this
>get a diophatine equation
I'm out.